![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Search:
|
Are You a Covered Government Contractor? Part II: Coverage Through Intra-Corporate Relationships
Posted: February 15, 2005
Page Tools:
Related Practice Areas:
The high cost of doing business with the federal government can increase dramatically if your company finds out too late that it is a federal contractor with affirmative action obligations. In Part I, published in the Year End 2004 issue of Preventive Strategies, we discussed how to determine whether an organization has affirmative action obligations resulting from a contractual relationship directly or indirectly to supply good or services to an agency of the federal government. In Part II, we discuss how intra-company relationships among parent, subsidiary, division or affiliate can spread coverage from one entity to another in a corporate family organizations. The standards for determining whether holding a government contract extends coverage to related entities, such as "parent" companies, subsidiaries, affiliates or divisions, were set forth in two administrative agency rulings. The U.S. Department of Labor v. Interco Inc. set forth "separate and distinct" as the standard for determining whether an unincorporated division and its "parent" are sufficiently interrelated to create universal coverage. A separate decision of the Comptroller General in Armstrong Cork established the five factors for ascertaining whether a federal contract held by a subsidiary will cause other divisions or subsidiaries, or a parent, to be federal contractors. Both tests focus upon the degree of control which the parent has over a subsidiary or a division. The five factors set forth in the Armstrong Cork decision are illustrated through a series of questions and answers. 1. Common OwnershipDo the parent and the subsidiary have common ownership? What percentage of the subsidiary's stock does the parent own? _______ % 2. Common Board Members, Directors or OfficersDo the parent and the subsidiary have any common directors on their boards of directors? Do the parent and the subsidiary have any common officers or employees? Did the parent hire the CEO of the subsidiary, and does the CEO report to anyone at the parent? Do any employees of the subsidiary report directly to the employees of the parent? 3. Interdependency of OperationsDo the parent and the subsidiary have separate legal staffs? Do the parent and the subsidiary have separate marketing and sales staffs? Would either the parent or the subsidiary be unable to function if the other ceased to exist? Is there a dependency of operations between the parent and the subsidiary in order to provide a product or service? Does the parent provide any servicing to the subsidiary in regard to the handling of accounts receivable, payroll, cash accounting, and sales shipments? Do the parent and the subsidiary maintain separate administration and payroll functions? Do the parent and the subsidiary maintain joint purchase or supply agreements? Does the parent provide any marketing services for the subsidiary or vice versa? In advertising, is either the parent or the subsidiary referred to as part of the other? Is the product or service of either entity essential to the conduct or operations of the other? 4. Uniform Labor Relations Policies Emanating from a Common SourceDoes the parent have de facto control over the personnel practices of the subsidiary?
Do the subsidiary employees have corporate credit cards and, if so, in what company name are the cards issued? Does the parent review and/or control labor practices in the subsidiary?
5. Exercised ControlHow frequently does the parent receive operating statements from the subsidiary? When the subsidiary submits operating statements, does the parent note problems in operations and require the subsidiary to take corrective action? Does the parent maintain dollar limitations on capital expenditures made by the subsidiary? Are purchases of real estate by the subsidiary subject to approval by the parent? Has there ever been an infusion of capital from the parent to the subsidiary or vice versa? What percentage of the parent's business is with the subsidiary and vice versa? _______ % If you would like to discuss coverage or would like more information about our Affirmative Action Practice group, please contact our practice group leader, Matt Halpern.
|