Skip to main content
Press Release

Jackson Lewis Ranked Employment Litigation "Powerhouse" in BTI Litigation Outlook 2016

WHITE PLAINS, NY (September 25, 2015) Jackson Lewis P.C., one of the country’s preeminent workplace law firms, is pleased to announce that for the fifth consecutive year the firm has been designated a Powerhouse in both Complex and Routine Litigation in the BTI Litigation Outlook 2016: Changes, Trends and Opportunities for Law Firms.  The results of this in-depth analysis of today’s litigation market are based on extensive one-on-one interviews with over 300 corporate counsel from Fortune 1000 companies.

Jackson Lewis Chairman Vincent A. Cino said the survey results were a testament to the firm’s commitment to client service. “The fact that our clients hold us in such high esteem is everything. We are in a service profession and must make sure we take care of their needs.”

“We are honored to be recognized by BTI,” said Joan Ackerstein, Jackson Lewis’ National Director of Litigation. “I congratulate our ever-growing team of hard-working, passionate litigators who have ensured Jackson Lewis has become known as a go-to firm for employment litigation.”

BTI President Michael B. Rynowecer said the Powerhouse firms are “noteworthy not only for their investments over the years but also for being willing to be flexible and utilize firm-wide resources to pursue and service clients” and are “making huge investments in understanding clients and the kinds of litigation they’re facing — in some cases designing specific systems and specific protocols to meet the larger needs of larger clients.”

“BTI’s recent survey makes clear that employers now, more than ever, are in need of legal review and guidance of their long-standing policies and procedures in light of an increased focus on background check policies, LGBT worker rights, recent National Labor Relations Board decisions and on-going wage-and-hour issues,” said William J. Anthony, Leader of Jackson Lewis’ Class Actions and Complex Litigation Practice Group.  “Given this dynamic landscape, we could not be more pleased that our litigation success has been recognized by our core constituency.”

More information about the BTI Litigation Outlook 2016 can be found here.

 

About BTI Consulting Group, Inc.

The BTI Consulting Group (BTI) is the leading provider of strategic market research to law firms and professional services firms, conducting independent research on how clients acquire, manage and evaluate their professional service providers. The group’s unique methods and approach have propelled over 20 years of fact-based research on buyers and sellers of professional services. BTI has interviewed more than 13,000 buyers and has benchmarked how Fortune 1000 companies buy, how professional services firms sell and how to manage service provider performance.

 

About Jackson Lewis

Founded in 1958, Jackson Lewis is dedicated to representing management exclusively in workplace law. With 800 attorneys practicing in major locations throughout the U.S. and Puerto Rico, Jackson Lewis is included in the AmLaw 100 and Global 100 rankings of law firms. The firm’s wide range of specialized areas of practice provides the resources to address every aspect of the employer/employee relationship. Jackson Lewis is a leader in educating employers about the laws of equal opportunity and, as a firm, understands the importance of having a workforce that reflects the various communities it serves.

Jackson Lewis is a founding member of L&E Global Employers’ Counsel Worldwide, an alliance of premier employment law firms and practices in Europe, North America and the Asia Pacific Region.

Additional information about the firm can be found at www.jacksonlewis.com.

 

    

For more information about Jackson Lewis, please contact:

Lara Hamm, Jackson Lewis

T: (267) 319-7803

E: HammL@jacksonlewis.com

 

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING

Jackson Lewis P.C. offices that are responsible for the content of this advertisement include New York, NY; Hartford, CT; New Orleans, LA; and Orlando, FL. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.