Search form

Carolina Employer Workplace News - October 2015

By Nicola Ai Ling Prall, Andreas N. Satterfield and William Robert Gignilliat, IV
  • October 19, 2015

Lessons for Terminating an Employee

A case involving a claim for breach of an oral promise provides lessons for employers on what “not to do” when discharging an employee. A South Carolina jury returned an $868,000 verdict for the wrongful termination claim. Lessons include watching what you say. Read more...

North Carolina At-Will Unchanged by Federal Public Policy

All employment in North Carolina is considered “at will,” and employers (or employees) may end the employment relationship for any reason. While the state high court recognized an exception to this rule when an employer’s reason for ending the employment relationship is unlawful or contrary to public policy, it has not recognized an exception for a wrong discharge claim under state law based on federal public policy. A federal district court found that the “consensus” among North Carolina’s intermediate courts is that such an exception does not exist. Read more...


We welcomed Associate Wm. Robert Gignilliat to our Greenville Office this past June. Mr. Gignilliat is admitted to practice law in both South Carolina and Georgia. Prior to joining the firm, he clerked for U.S. District Court judges in Anderson, SC and Augusta, GA. He is a graduate of the University of Georgia School of Law.


Jackson Lewis is proud to be honored with top rankings from Chambers USA, U.S. News and Best Lawyers, BTI, and The Legal 500, among others.


Presented by Jackson Lewis attorneys, our webinars cover topics important to employers. Visit our Webinars page to view past and upcoming programs.


If you have questions about these or other workplace developments, please contact a Jackson Lewis attorney in the Greenville or Raleigh office.

©2015 Jackson Lewis P.C. This Update is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice nor does it create an attorney/client relationship between Jackson Lewis and any readers or recipients. Readers should consult counsel of their own choosing to discuss how these matters relate to their individual circumstances. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without the express written consent of Jackson Lewis.

This Update may be considered attorney advertising in some states. Furthermore, prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Jackson Lewis P.C. represents management exclusively in workplace law and related litigation. Our attorneys are available to assist employers in their compliance efforts and to represent employers in matters before state and federal courts and administrative agencies. For more information, please contact the attorney(s) listed or the Jackson Lewis attorney with whom you regularly work.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

October 30, 2017

Chicago Adopts ‘Hands Off Pants On’ Law to Protect Hotel Workers from Sexual Harassment, Assault

October 30, 2017

To provide hospitality workers greater protections against sexual harassment and assault, the Chicago City Council passed the “Hands Off Pants On” Ordinance on October 11, 2017. The Ordinance requires all hotels in the City to adopt a panic button system and an anti-sexual harassment policy. The Ordinance was passed after months of... Read More

October 24, 2017

California Adds ‘Transgender,’ ‘Gender Nonconforming Individuals’ to Sexual Harassment Prevention Training for Supervisors

October 24, 2017

Employers subject to California’s mandatory sexual harassment training requirement for supervisors will need to ensure their programs include prevention of harassment based on gender identity, gender expression, and sexual orientation following an amendment (SB 396) to California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). On October 15... Read More

October 5, 2017

Department of Justice Releases Memorandum Restricting Transgender Worker Protection under Title VII

October 5, 2017

On October 4, 2017, Attorney General Jeff Sessions reversed the Department of Justice’s position that gender identity is protected as part of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act’s prohibition against sex discrimination — taking a position that is contrary to current guidance from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. In a... Read More

Related Practices