Search form

Claims and Recoveries Up at EEOC in 2015, Retaliation Tops Charges

By Paul Patten and Jeremy S. Schneider
  • February 29, 2016

The number of charges filed with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission rose in the Commission’s last fiscal year, and the amount of money the agency recovered through administrative enforcement and litigation rose sharply in 2015 over 2014. (The fiscal year runs from October 1 to September 30.)

The EEOC released data breaking down the approximately 90,000 charges it received during the government’s fiscal year on February 11, 2016. Charges were up from the 2014 total, which represented a near-decade low. In particular, retaliation claims accounted for 44.5% of all charges, while those alleging race and disability discrimination (up nearly 6% in 2015) amounted to 34.7% and 30.2% of charges, respectively. As for the complete breakdown of claims (some charges alleged multiple bases):

  • Retaliation: 39,757 (44.5% of all charges filed)
  • Race: 31,027 (34.7%)
  • Disability: 26,968 (30.2%)
  • Sex: 26,396 (29.5%)
  • Age: 20,144 (22.5%)
  • National Origin: 9,438 (10.6%)
  • Religion: 3,502 (3.9%)
  • Color: 2,833 (3.2%)
  • Equal Pay Act: 973 (1.1%)
  • Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act: 257 (0.3%)

In the release, the EEOC also touted its recoveries. In FY 2015, the EEOC recovered more than $525 million in private, state and local government, and federal workplace actions. This includes $356.6 million in recovery in private sector and state and local government workplaces through mediation, conciliation, and settlements; $65.3 million for charging parties through litigation; and $105.7 million for federal employees and applicants. The total figure is approximately $60 million more than the EEOC brought in the year before.

Litigation recoveries also jumped nearly 300%. In FY 2015, the EEOC filed 142 merits lawsuits, up from 133 in 2014. The majority of the lawsuits filed alleged violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, followed by suits under the Americans with Disabilities Act. This included 100 individual lawsuits and 42 lawsuits involving multiple victims of discriminatory policies, of which 16 were systemic.

What does this mean for employers?

While employers should strive to reduce the frequency of charges overall, the data shows retaliation was by far the most frequently alleged basis for disputes brought to the EEOC, making up 45% of all private sector charges. Indeed, retaliation has been at the top since 2010.

Moreover, the agency itself states that “[p]reserving access to the legal system, which includes retaliatory actions, is a national priority for [the] EEOC.” To that end, the agency also is seeking public input on a proposed update of its enforcement guidance addressing retaliation and related issues.

If the EEOC characterizes retaliation as a “national priority,” so should employers. In 2016, given the prevalence of — and focus on — retaliation claims, employers should be training management and human resources personnel on how to receive and address internal discrimination complaints. Likewise, company policies and procedures regarding complaints should be drafted clearly and followed uniformly. These measures, if timely and effectively implemented, can mitigate the frequency of retaliation charges.

Jackson Lewis attorneys are available to answer your questions about this, the EEOC, or any other workplace developments that affects your business.

©2016 Jackson Lewis P.C. This Update is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice nor does it create an attorney/client relationship between Jackson Lewis and any readers or recipients. Readers should consult counsel of their own choosing to discuss how these matters relate to their individual circumstances. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without the express written consent of Jackson Lewis.

This Update may be considered attorney advertising in some states. Furthermore, prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Jackson Lewis P.C. represents management exclusively in workplace law and related litigation. Our attorneys are available to assist employers in their compliance efforts and to represent employers in matters before state and federal courts and administrative agencies. For more information, please contact the attorney(s) listed or the Jackson Lewis attorney with whom you regularly work.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

October 30, 2017

Chicago Adopts ‘Hands Off Pants On’ Law to Protect Hotel Workers from Sexual Harassment, Assault

October 30, 2017

To provide hospitality workers greater protections against sexual harassment and assault, the Chicago City Council passed the “Hands Off Pants On” Ordinance on October 11, 2017. The Ordinance requires all hotels in the City to adopt a panic button system and an anti-sexual harassment policy. The Ordinance was passed after months of... Read More

October 24, 2017

California Adds ‘Transgender,’ ‘Gender Nonconforming Individuals’ to Sexual Harassment Prevention Training for Supervisors

October 24, 2017

Employers subject to California’s mandatory sexual harassment training requirement for supervisors will need to ensure their programs include prevention of harassment based on gender identity, gender expression, and sexual orientation following an amendment (SB 396) to California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). On October 15... Read More

October 5, 2017

Department of Justice Releases Memorandum Restricting Transgender Worker Protection under Title VII

October 5, 2017

On October 4, 2017, Attorney General Jeff Sessions reversed the Department of Justice’s position that gender identity is protected as part of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act’s prohibition against sex discrimination — taking a position that is contrary to current guidance from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. In a... Read More

Related Practices