Search form

Colorado Companions for Elderly Entitled to Overtime Pay

  • October 1, 2015

The minimum wage and overtime pay rules in Colorado’s Minimum Wage Order (MWO) apply to companions for the elderly or infirm who work for third-party employers, a federal judge in Colorado has ruled. Kennett v. Bayada Home Health Care, Inc., 14-cv-2005-CMA-MJW (D. Colo. Sept. 24, 2015).

Only companions who are employed directly by the households or families of the elderly or infirm are exempt from the rules, the court said. This is the first court decision in Colorado on this issue.

The home health care company in this class action case employed “home health aides” (HHAs) to provide companion services to company clients in the clients’ households. The services included bathing, toileting, making beds, preparing meals, assisting with feeding, preventing falls, and monitoring vital signs.

Colorado’s MWO sets minimum wage and overtime pay rules, but exempts from those rules “companions, casual babysitters, and domestic employees employed by households or family members to perform duties in private residences.” 7 CCR 1103-1:5.

The company did not pay overtime compensation to its HHAs, but argued the HHAs were exempt from the rules under the companion exemption.

The district court agreed the HHAs were companions, but ruled they were not exempt because they were employed by a third-party – the company – and not by the household or families of clients. The court held that the “household qualifier” in the exemption applied not only to domestic employees, but to companions also.

Federal rules under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) have long exempted from FLSA minimum wage and overtime pay rules companions employed by third parties, but those rules were changed to disallow the exemption. 29 C.F.R. § 552.109(a) (2015). The new rule disallowing the exemption to such companions was recently upheld in Home Care Association of America v. Weil, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 14730 (D.C. Cir. Aug. 21, 2015), and will presumably go into effect soon.

Thus, home health care companies in Colorado run a significant financial risk under Colorado law — and soon federal law — if they do not pay the minimum wage or overtime compensation to companions they employ.

Employers should consult with employment counsel to determine whether and how their particular specific organizational needs may be affected by this decision.

©2015 Jackson Lewis P.C. This Update is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice nor does it create an attorney/client relationship between Jackson Lewis and any readers or recipients. Readers should consult counsel of their own choosing to discuss how these matters relate to their individual circumstances. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without the express written consent of Jackson Lewis.

This Update may be considered attorney advertising in some states. Furthermore, prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Jackson Lewis P.C. represents management exclusively in workplace law and related litigation. Our attorneys are available to assist employers in their compliance efforts and to represent employers in matters before state and federal courts and administrative agencies. For more information, please contact the attorney(s) listed or the Jackson Lewis attorney with whom you regularly work.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

November 15, 2017

2018 Minimum Wage Rate Increases: Are You Ready?

November 15, 2017

The federal minimum wage has remained stagnant at $7.25 an hour since 2009. In the absence of an increase to the federal minimum wage, an increasing number of states, cities, and other municipalities have enacted statutes providing for minimum wage rates in excess of (and, in some cases, more than twice as high as) the federal rate.... Read More

November 14, 2017

New York Department of Labor Proposes Scheduling Regulations

November 14, 2017

Big changes may be in store for employers in New York who require employees to be “on call” or who are accustomed to making quick changes to employee schedules, including canceling shifts when customer or client demand changes. On November 10, 2017, the New York State Department of Labor (NYDOL) released the text of anticipated... Read More

November 8, 2017

New York City Issues Proposed Rules for Fast Food, Retail Workers Scheduling Law

November 8, 2017

The New York City Department of Consumer Affairs (DCA) has issued proposed rules for the implementation of the Fair Workweek Law in an attempt to clarify and assist employers with compliance. The Law is intended to reform scheduling practices for fast food and retail workers in the City and will go into effect on November 26, 2017.... Read More

Related Practices