Search form

EEOC Publishes Final Pay Data Changes to EEO-1 Report

By K. Joy Chin and Stephanie E. Lewis
  • September 29, 2016

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has issued revisions requiring employers with at least 100 employees to submit annual EEO-1 reports that include W-2 pay and hours worked data for their entire workforces, nationwide.

Armed with the data, and intent upon identifying pay disparities causing the “wage gap” for women and minorities, the EEOC and the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs will monitor and test employer data and investigate in detail the pay practices of those employers whose data suggests indefensible pay disparities.

When Will New EEO-1 Report be Required?

The first modified reports will not be filed until the first quarter of 2018. Rather than file EEO-1 reports as usual in the fall of 2017, the revised EEO-1 pay data report will be filed by March 31, 2018.

In subsequent years, March 31 will be the annual filing deadline. Thus, employers will need to pull W-2 pay data only once a year for both tax and EEO-1 reporting purposes.

EEO-1 reports for 2016 will be filed as usual without pay data.

Significant Impact on Employers

For months, Jackson Lewis has been preparing clients and friends for these significant changes. For the first time, the EEOC and OFCCP would have comprehensive employee pay data, allowing the agencies to effectively target employers for systemic pay discrimination investigations.

Employers’ data collection and reporting burdens will increase exponentially and beyond the EEOC’s stated estimates. Further, while the EEOC sought to address confidentiality concerns surrounding submission of sensitive compensation data, the final revisions leave some of those concerns intact, raising new concerns over the Commission’s proposal to publish employers’ aggregated pay data.

What Must Employers Do Now?

  • Conduct Proactive EEO Pay Analyses to Assess Risk: Employers cannot afford to turn over pay data to EEOC and OFCCP without knowing first what it says and whether and where risks may lie. Employers are well-advised to begin preparations now, starting with pay analyses to identify and address pay issues that could emerge from the EEO-1 pay data and arise in systemic investigations by EEOC or OFCCP.
  • Protect Analyses under the Attorney-Client Privilege: Statistical analyses and legal advice based on the analyses must be protected by the attorney-client privilege because the agencies may request the analyses in an investigation. The analyses must not be done informally by the employer’s compensation department or external consultants without the direct involvement of counsel for the purpose of providing legal advice.
  • Speak with IT Function and Outside HRIS and Payroll System Vendors: Gathering and reconciling the data to be reported will be no simple task. Assess the company’s current situation and data systems and determine what will be necessary in terms of staffing and budget.
  • Organization Required to Report? Larger employers are well-aware of EEO-1 reporting obligations. Employers who have not previously filed, but have reached the 100-employee threshold, are required to file EEO-1 reports. EEOC has sued employers solely for failure to file EEO-1 reports in the past. It may use the failure to file an EEO-1 report to support a substantive discrimination claim.

Please contact the Jackson Lewis Pay Equity Resource Group for additional insight and guidance.

©2016 Jackson Lewis P.C. This Update is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice nor does it create an attorney/client relationship between Jackson Lewis and any readers or recipients. Readers should consult counsel of their own choosing to discuss how these matters relate to their individual circumstances. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without the express written consent of Jackson Lewis.

This Update may be considered attorney advertising in some states. Furthermore, prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Jackson Lewis P.C. represents management exclusively in workplace law and related litigation. Our attorneys are available to assist employers in their compliance efforts and to represent employers in matters before state and federal courts and administrative agencies. For more information, please contact the attorney(s) listed or the Jackson Lewis attorney with whom you regularly work.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

September 29, 2017

NYC Issues Guidance on Upcoming Salary Inquiry Prohibitions

September 29, 2017

Effective October 31, 2017, New York City employers generally may not inquire about or rely upon a job applicant’s salary history in making employment decisions. The New York City Commission on Human Rights has released an Employer Fact Sheet and a Job Applicant Fact Sheet to assist employers and employees with understanding the law... Read More

September 15, 2017

California on Brink of Further Expansion of Fair Pay Protections

September 15, 2017

California’s legislature is close to passing three bills to expand the state’s fair pay laws. The bills, introduced in early 2017, were designed to expand upon, or clarify, the amended California Fair Pay Act (CFPA). The bills include: Assembly Bill (AB) 1209: To require employers with at least 500 employees in California to... Read More

August 30, 2017

EEOC Pay Reporting Obligations Suspended

August 30, 2017

In a much-anticipated move, the Office of Management and Budget’s Office of Information Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) has directed the Acting Chair of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to suspend implementation of the EEOC’s revised EEO-1 report, which included detailed pay reporting obligations. Prior to this directive issued... Read More