Search form

Massachusetts Strengthens Protections for Pregnant Workers

By Samia M. Kirmani and Brian E. Lewis
  • July 31, 2017

An amendment to the Massachusetts Fair Employment Practices Act, G.L. c. 151B, expressly includes pregnancy as a protected characteristic and expands accommodation requirements for pregnant employees. The amended law goes into effect April 1, 2018.

Requirements

The amended law expressly establishes pregnancy “or any condition related to the employee’s pregnancy, including, but not limited to, lactation or the need to express breast milk for a nursing child,” as a protected characteristic and requires that employers not discriminate against employees on the basis of pregnancy or conditions related to pregnancy (such as expressing breast milk). It further prohibits employers from retaliating against pregnant employees who request reasonable accommodation. Like other discrimination statutes, the new law makes it unlawful for employers to take adverse actions or deny employment because of an employee’s pregnancy or because she may require a reasonable accommodation. Employers also may not require pregnant employees to accept accommodations that are not necessary for them to perform their job or require them to take a leave of absence if alternative accommodations may suffice to meet their needs.

Reasonable Accommodations

The amended law affirmatively requires that employers provide reasonable accommodations to pregnant employees. The law provides several examples of reasonable accommodations, such as:

  • more frequent or longer breaks;
  • time off;
  • acquisition or modification of equipment or seating;
  • temporary transfers;
  • job restructuring;
  • light duty;
  • private non-bathroom space for expressing breast milk;
  • assistance with manual labor; or
  • a modified work schedule.

The law makes clear that employers are not required to discharge or transfer an employee with more seniority or promote an employee who is not able to perform the job with or without a reasonable accommodation.

The reasonable accommodation requirements under the amended law go further than those currently provided under current federal and state law. Under the Americans with Disabilities Act, for example, expectant mothers typically receive reasonable accommodations if they suffer from temporary medical conditions exacerbated by pregnancy, such as gestational diabetes. Under the amended Massachusetts law, pregnant employees may seek reasonable accommodations on the basis of pregnancy or childbirth, with or without the existence of related medical complications.

Under the new law, employers must engage in the interactive process to determine what reasonable accommodation may be required. Employers may seek and require documentation for certain, but not all, accommodations requested by the employee. The law specifically provides that employers may not seek or require documentation for the requested accommodation if the accommodation sought is more frequent breaks, seating changes, limitations on lifting more than 20 pounds, or a private space for expressing breast milk.

The new law also makes clear that employers are not required to provide an accommodation if doing so would result in an undue hardship on the employer. While the burden lies with the employer to prove undue hardship, the law enumerates the following four factors that should be considered in determining whether an undue hardship exists:

  1. the nature and cost of the accommodation;
  2. the financial resources of the employer;
  3. the size of the employer; and
  4. the effect and impact of the accommodation on the employer’s business.

Notice

The new law also provides explicit, written notice requirements. Specifically, employers must provide written notice — in an employee handbook or elsewhere — of employee rights under the new law. Such notice also must be provided:

  1. to new employees on or prior to their first day; and
  2. to an employee who notifies the employer of a pregnancy or of a condition related to pregnancy (e.g., lactation or need to express breast milk) within 10 days after such notification.

In addition, the law calls for the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination to provide “courses of instruction” and “conduct public education” on the law, provided that the legislature appropriates money for it to do so.

Next Steps

Employers should review their policies, practices, and communications as they relate to hiring, discrimination, accommodation, leave, and lactation so that appropriate notices are provided at hire and upon learning of an employee’s pregnancy or need for accommodation. As is the case with other compliance and employee-relations matters, employers should consider training Human Resource professionals and managers on their responsibilities under the new law.

If you have questions or concerns about the new Massachusetts law, do not hesitate to contact your Jackson Lewis attorney.

(We thank Summer Associate Matthew Chambers for assisting with this legal update.)

©2017 Jackson Lewis P.C. This Update is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice nor does it create an attorney/client relationship between Jackson Lewis and any readers or recipients. Readers should consult counsel of their own choosing to discuss how these matters relate to their individual circumstances. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without the express written consent of Jackson Lewis.

This Update may be considered attorney advertising in some states. Furthermore, prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Jackson Lewis P.C. represents management exclusively in workplace law and related litigation. Our attorneys are available to assist employers in their compliance efforts and to represent employers in matters before state and federal courts and administrative agencies. For more information, please contact the attorney(s) listed or the Jackson Lewis attorney with whom you regularly work.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

August 15, 2017

Why the Chicago and Cook County Paid-Sick-Leave Ordinances May Apply to Your Organization

August 15, 2017

Paid-sick-leave ordinances (PSLOs) became effective in the City of Chicago and Cook County on July 1, 2017. The PSLOs require employers to grant paid sick leave to employees on terms more generous than what most employers have historically offered. (For example, see our article, Cook County, Illinois, Issues Final Paid Sick Leave... Read More

August 7, 2017

New Florida Law Aims to Put Brakes on ADA Barrier-to-Access Lawsuits

August 7, 2017

Responding to the alarming proliferation of lawsuits in Florida alleging that places of public accommodations create barriers to access to disabled patrons, Florida has adopted what appears to be the first law in the country attempting to provide some defense to beleaguered businesses. The law authorizes qualified experts to inspect... Read More

July 27, 2017

Proposed New York City Council Legislation Would Add Private Right of Action to Earned Sick Time Act and Prohibit Non-Competes for Low-Wage Employees

July 27, 2017

New legislation introduced in the New York City Council would add a private right of action to the Earned Sick Time Act (Introduction 1667) and prohibit employers from entering into a covenant not to compete with any low-wage employee of that employer (Introduction 1663). Introduction 1667 was sponsored by the Council’s Deputy Leader... Read More