Search form

Mine Safety Agency Enhances Enforcement of ‘Rules to Live By’ to Prevent Mining Fatalities

By Nickole C. Winnett
  • July 18, 2017

The Mine Safety and Health Administration said it has begun “enhanced” enforcement of its “Rules to Live By” initiative, regulating standards commonly linked to mine deaths, as well as nine underground coal mine exam standards, targeting the greatest risks to miners in underground coal mines.

The agency announced in 2016 that these heightened measures would begin July 1, 2017.

Started in 2010, “Rules to Live By” includes 29 coal mine standards and 20 metal and nonmetal mine standards the agency identified as critical to reducing fatalities in the mining industry. The nine underground coal mine exam standards, published in 2012, address ventilation, methane, roof control, combustible materials, rock dust, equipment guarding and other safeguards. MSHA said these are “consistent with the standards emphasized in MSHA’s ‘Rules to Live By’ initiative and the types of violations cited in MSHA’s accident investigation report on the [2010] Upper Big Branch Mine explosion as contributing to the cause of that deadly accident.” The explosion in Raleigh County, West Virginia, killed 29 miners.

“While we’ve seen progress in reducing mining deaths associated with both Rules to Live By and the exam rule,” Joseph A. Main, Assistant Secretary of Labor for Mine Safety and Health, said, “mine operators need to conduct better site inspections and take appropriate action to improve compliance with these standards. That is why we are increasing attention on these critical standards. We urge the mining industry to do the same.”

Beginning July 1, 2017, MSHA said it will increasingly use its web-based “ Rules to Live By Calculator” to identify the number of citations and orders issued during the most recent completed inspection periods for which data are available. Inspectors will give mine operators a copy of the results, “encouraging them to use the tools to monitor their own compliance and take action to eliminate violations.” MSHA said, “The results will be added to criteria for consideration of impact inspections, particularly targeting mines with elevated noncompliance of these standards.”

The agency’s analysis of hundreds of U.S. mining fatalities over a 10-year period revealed that fatalities associated with “Rules to Live By” standards have decreased an average of 23 percent. Further, “significant and substantial” citations and orders issued for violations of these standards have declined an average of 37 percent.

Fatalities associated with the exam rule have decreased an average of 22 percent, according to MSHA, and “significant and substantial,” or S&S, citations and orders issued for violations of this standard have declined an average of 45 percent.
 
The “Rules to Live By” program includes the following:

  • Rules to Live By I: Fatality Prevention – Launched in February 2010, focuses on 24 frequently cited standards (11 in coal mining and 13 in metal and nonmetal mining) that cause or contribute to fatal accidents in the mining industry in nine accident categories.
  • Rules to Live By II: Preventing Catastrophic Accidents – Begun in November 2010, focuses on standards MSHA cited during major disasters that contributed to five or more fatalities over the last 10 years.
  • Rules to Live By III: Preventing Common Mining Deaths – Started in January 2012, focuses on 14 safety standards (eight in coal mining and six in metal and nonmetal mining) cited in at least five mining accidents and resulting in at least five deaths during the 10-year period from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2010.
  • Rules to Live By IV: Preventing Common Mining Deaths – Announced in May 2016, focuses on two safety standards (one in coal mining and one in metal and nonmetal mining) cited as a result of at least five mining accidents and resulting in at least five fatalities during the 10-year period from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2015.

Jackson Lewis attorneys are available to help clients navigate federal regulations for safety and health compliance.

©2017 Jackson Lewis P.C. This Update is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice nor does it create an attorney/client relationship between Jackson Lewis and any readers or recipients. Readers should consult counsel of their own choosing to discuss how these matters relate to their individual circumstances. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without the express written consent of Jackson Lewis.

This Update may be considered attorney advertising in some states. Furthermore, prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Jackson Lewis P.C. represents management exclusively in workplace law and related litigation. Our attorneys are available to assist employers in their compliance efforts and to represent employers in matters before state and federal courts and administrative agencies. For more information, please contact the attorney(s) listed or the Jackson Lewis attorney with whom you regularly work.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

August 16, 2017

Mine Safety Agency Issues Alert on Wire and Hoisting Ropes

August 16, 2017

Saying new testing on wire and hoisting ropes showed they “no longer met MSHA’s in-service standards,” despite previously passing tests and inspections, the Mine Safety and Health Administration has issued a new safety alert on wire and hoisting ropes. MSHA said that, although it had previously conducted wire rope nondestructive... Read More

August 16, 2017

Need OSHA Action on Ammonium Nitrate and Healthcare Workplace Violence, Government Monitor Urges

August 16, 2017

Focus is needed on two safety and health priorities: healthcare workplace violence and high-risk facilities that handle hazardous substances such as ammonium nitrate, chief of the Government Accountability Office Gene L. Dodaro has urged Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta in a letter. In the letter, dated June 27, 2017, Dodaro, the... Read More

August 11, 2017

Federal Law Does Not Preempt Connecticut Medical Marijuana Law Employment Discrimination Prohibition

August 11, 2017

Federal law does not preempt the Connecticut medical marijuana statute’s prohibition on employers’ firing or refusing to hire qualified medical marijuana patients, even if they test positive on an employment-related drug test, the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut has held. Noffsinger v. SSC Niantic Operating Co., LLC,... Read More

Related Practices