Search form

Mine Safety Agency Issues Blasting Equipment Alert

By Bradford T. Hammock
  • April 17, 2017

The Mine Safety and Health Administration has issued a safety alert advising employers to take precautions when storing, handling, transporting, and using explosives and detonators in underground coal mines near energized equipment or electrical systems. These include communications and tracking system infrastructure, electronic components worn or carried by miners, and the like.

Employers should remember that it is important to maintain appropriate separation distances between electric blasting circuits and all potential sources of electrical current including equipment that emits radio frequency (RF) energy, MSHA said. It advised following manufacturer recommendations on storage, handling, transportation, and usage.

MSHA also recommended certain best practices, including:

  • Protect electric blasting circuits from all sources of stray electric current.
  • Maintain a minimum 50-foot distance from RF energy, unless other means are provided and approved. Other means may include placing detonators in a container compliant with 30 C.F.R. 75.1311 and housed in a fully enclosed metallic structure to provide shielding from RF energy.
  • Consider and manage all sources of stray electric current, including portable and RF emitting devices to which electric detonators may be exposed when stored, transported, handled, and used.
  • Maintain detonators in their original containers, coiled, shunted, and folded as received from the manufacturer until ready for use.
  • Review and update, as necessary, the Emergency Response Plan (ERP) to ensure that proper procedures are in place to prevent exposure to RF energy during storage, handling, and transportation and use of explosives and detonators.

Jackson Lewis attorneys are available to assist employers in complying with MSHA guidance regarding workplace safety and health.

©2017 Jackson Lewis P.C. This Update is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice nor does it create an attorney/client relationship between Jackson Lewis and any readers or recipients. Readers should consult counsel of their own choosing to discuss how these matters relate to their individual circumstances. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without the express written consent of Jackson Lewis.

This Update may be considered attorney advertising in some states. Furthermore, prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Jackson Lewis P.C. represents management exclusively in workplace law and related litigation. Our attorneys are available to assist employers in their compliance efforts and to represent employers in matters before state and federal courts and administrative agencies. For more information, please contact the attorney(s) listed or the Jackson Lewis attorney with whom you regularly work.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

May 25, 2017

Employer’s Refusal to Hire Medical Marijuana User Violates State Law, Rhode Island State Court Holds

May 25, 2017

Employers cannot refuse to hire a medical marijuana cardholder, even if the individual admittedly would not pass the employer’s pre-employment drug test required of all applicants, a Rhode Island state court has held under the state medical marijuana law. Callaghan v. Darlington Fabrics Corp., et al., No. PC-2014-5680 (R.I. Super. Ct.,... Read More

May 24, 2017

Trump Nominates Sullivan for Last Vacant Seat on Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

May 24, 2017

President Donald Trump has nominated attorney James Sullivan to the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC) to fill the remaining vacancy on the three-member commission. OSHRC is an independent agency that adjudicates contested citations between employers and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration... Read More

May 17, 2017

Challenge to Mine Safety POV Rule Stayed for Settlement Talks

May 17, 2017

An Ohio court case on the validity of the Mine Safety and Health Administration’s 2013 rule on “pattern of violation,” or “POV,” may be near an end. At the joint request of the plaintiffs and MSHA, a judge for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio issued a 120-day stay in the lawsuit in which mine operators and... Read More

Related Practices