Search form

Mine Safety Agency Issues Blasting Equipment Alert

By Bradford T. Hammock
  • April 17, 2017

The Mine Safety and Health Administration has issued a safety alert advising employers to take precautions when storing, handling, transporting, and using explosives and detonators in underground coal mines near energized equipment or electrical systems. These include communications and tracking system infrastructure, electronic components worn or carried by miners, and the like.

Employers should remember that it is important to maintain appropriate separation distances between electric blasting circuits and all potential sources of electrical current including equipment that emits radio frequency (RF) energy, MSHA said. It advised following manufacturer recommendations on storage, handling, transportation, and usage.

MSHA also recommended certain best practices, including:

  • Protect electric blasting circuits from all sources of stray electric current.
  • Maintain a minimum 50-foot distance from RF energy, unless other means are provided and approved. Other means may include placing detonators in a container compliant with 30 C.F.R. 75.1311 and housed in a fully enclosed metallic structure to provide shielding from RF energy.
  • Consider and manage all sources of stray electric current, including portable and RF emitting devices to which electric detonators may be exposed when stored, transported, handled, and used.
  • Maintain detonators in their original containers, coiled, shunted, and folded as received from the manufacturer until ready for use.
  • Review and update, as necessary, the Emergency Response Plan (ERP) to ensure that proper procedures are in place to prevent exposure to RF energy during storage, handling, and transportation and use of explosives and detonators.

Jackson Lewis attorneys are available to assist employers in complying with MSHA guidance regarding workplace safety and health.

©2017 Jackson Lewis P.C. This Update is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice nor does it create an attorney/client relationship between Jackson Lewis and any readers or recipients. Readers should consult counsel of their own choosing to discuss how these matters relate to their individual circumstances. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without the express written consent of Jackson Lewis.

This Update may be considered attorney advertising in some states. Furthermore, prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Jackson Lewis P.C. represents management exclusively in workplace law and related litigation. Our attorneys are available to assist employers in their compliance efforts and to represent employers in matters before state and federal courts and administrative agencies. For more information, please contact the attorney(s) listed or the Jackson Lewis attorney with whom you regularly work.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

July 19, 2017

Claim of Massachusetts Employee Fired for Medical Marijuana Use May Proceed, State High Court Rules

July 19, 2017

An employee fired after she tested positive for marijuana on a test administered in the hiring process should be able to proceed with her “handicap discrimination” claim under Massachusetts’ anti-discrimination statute, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has ruled. Barbuto v. Advantage Sales & Marketing, LLC, SJC -12226 (July... Read More

July 18, 2017

Mine Safety Agency Enhances Enforcement of ‘Rules to Live By’ to Prevent Mining Fatalities

July 18, 2017

The Mine Safety and Health Administration said it has begun “enhanced” enforcement of its “Rules to Live By” initiative, regulating standards commonly linked to mine deaths, as well as nine underground coal mine exam standards, targeting the greatest risks to miners in underground coal mines. The agency announced in 2016 that these... Read More

July 18, 2017

OSHA Exempts Monorail Hoists from Cranes and Derricks Regulations

July 18, 2017

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration has issued a new enforcement policy that excludes monorail hoists from regulations on cranes and derricks in constructions. Stakeholders had argued that monorail hoists are not the same as cranes and derricks in construction, pointing out that these hoists are attached to fixed... Read More

Related Practices