Search form

Mine Safety Inspection Rule Delayed to October

By Bradford T. Hammock
  • May 30, 2017

The effective date of a Mine Safety and Health Administration rule requiring safety inspections of hardrock mines before workers begin their shifts will be delayed to October 2, 2017.

Previously, mine operators were allowed to conduct inspections during shifts, when MSHA officials said workers faced unsafe conditions.

The mine safety rule, first proposed on June 8, 2016, and published on January 23, 2017, was set to take effect on May 23, 2017.

On May 22, 2017, MSHA said that delaying the rule’s effective date would allow it additional time to provide compliance assistance to those affected by the regulation, including small mining companies. The agency said it needs additional time to conduct more outreach, develop compliance assistance, and train operators on the rule. Mining industry officials also said they need additional time to make new training, document revisions, and recordkeeping system changes. Under the rule, operators must inform miners of any safety or health hazards, immediately correct problems, and maintain records of their inspections.

MSHA Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor Patricia W. Silvey said the agency is “committed to assuring that mine operators and miners affected by the examinations final rule have the training and compliance assistance they need prior to the rule’s effective date.”

The agency said, “As part of the outreach and compliance assistance process, MSHA would consider issues raised by stakeholders and consider further extending the effective date in order to determine if these issues can be reasonably addressed through compliance assistance and training.” MSHA said it also seeks comments regarding the appropriate length of the proposed extension.

In a March 27, 2017, notice, MSHA had proposed extending the deadline by two months to July 24, 2017.

MSHA said that almost 90 percent of metal and nonmetal mines are small operations with fewer than 20 employees, many in remote areas. Small mines “may have limited access or no access to the Internet at the mine site and may rely on stakeholder meetings and other MSHA in-person services to acquire the knowledge to comply with the rule.”

When it first proposed the rule, MSHA said it “believes that making and maintaining a record of adverse conditions found and corrective actions taken would help mine operators and miners and their representatives become more aware of potential dangers and more proactive in their approach to correcting these issues before they cause or contribute to an accident, injury, or fatality.”

In developing the proposed rule, MSHA said it reviewed accident investigation reports and the agency’s enforcement data from January 2010 through mid-December 2015. During this period, 122 miners were killed in 110 accidents at metal and nonmetal (M/NM) mines. The agency said it conducted investigations into each of these 110 fatal accidents and issued 252 citations and orders for violations of 95 different mandatory safety and health standards.

Accident investigations revealed that, in more than 60 percent of the fatal accidents (67 out of 110), MSHA had issued at least one citation or order for a violation of a mandatory safety or health standard identified in its Rules to Live By (RTLB) initiative, launched in February 2010. Violations of the 19 M/NM RTLB standards represent the conditions or practices that have been most frequently cited as causing or contributing to fatal accidents.

Jackson Lewis attorneys are available to navigate new policy initiatives impacting federal health and safety regulations.

©2017 Jackson Lewis P.C. This Update is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice nor does it create an attorney/client relationship between Jackson Lewis and any readers or recipients. Readers should consult counsel of their own choosing to discuss how these matters relate to their individual circumstances. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without the express written consent of Jackson Lewis.

This Update may be considered attorney advertising in some states. Furthermore, prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Jackson Lewis P.C. represents management exclusively in workplace law and related litigation. Our attorneys are available to assist employers in their compliance efforts and to represent employers in matters before state and federal courts and administrative agencies. For more information, please contact the attorney(s) listed or the Jackson Lewis attorney with whom you regularly work.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

August 11, 2017

Federal Law Does Not Preempt Connecticut Medical Marijuana Law Employment Discrimination Prohibition

August 11, 2017

Federal law does not preempt the Connecticut medical marijuana statute’s prohibition on employers’ firing or refusing to hire qualified medical marijuana patients, even if they test positive on an employment-related drug test, the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut has held. Noffsinger v. SSC Niantic Operating Co., LLC,... Read More

August 7, 2017

For Third Straight Year, No Mines Eligible for a Pattern of Violations Notice

August 7, 2017

The Mine Safety and Health Administration has announced that, for the third consecutive year, none of the nation’s more than 13,000 mining operations met the criteria for a Pattern of Violations (POV) notice, which would trigger a temporary ceasing of operations. MSHA said its screening period ran from July 1, 2016, until June 30,... Read More

August 7, 2017

OSHA Releases New Online Whistleblower Complaint Form for Workers

August 7, 2017

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration has released a  revised online whistleblower complaint form. In an announcement, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health Loren Sweatt said, “Workers who report unsafe conditions and wrongdoing have a range of legal protections from retaliation. The... Read More

Related Practices