Search form

New Department of Homeland Security Memos Set Immigration Enforcement Priorities

By Michael H. Neifach and Amy L. Peck
  • February 23, 2017

Two memorandums from the Department of Homeland Security implementing President Donald Trump’s Executive Orders on “Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States” and “Implementing the President’s Border Security and Immigration Enforcement Improvements Policies” establish broad enforcement priorities for the removal of individuals from the U.S. Issued by DHS Secretary John Kelly on February 20, 2017, the memos expressly overrule Obama Administration memos and guidelines prioritizing the removal of criminal aliens.

In addition, the Kelly memos state that the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program remains in effect, and that the program for certain parents of U.S. citizens or permanent residents (DAPA), which has never been implemented, will be “addressed in future guidance.”

According to the new guidelines, DHS will prioritize removal of aliens who are convicted of any criminal offense, have been charged for an unresolved criminal offense, or have committed acts constituting a chargeable offense. Significantly, because commission of any chargeable offense is now within DHS’s enforcement priorities, otherwise undocumented individuals who provided a false Social Security number or false identity information to an employer as part of the I-9 employment eligibility verification process may expect to be targeted for removal.

To deal with the enforcement expansion, DHS intends to hire 10,000 new Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers and agents, and 5,000 additional Customs and Border Protection agents. DHS also intends to acquire additional detention space for aliens awaiting removal. Further, DHS will look to enter into agreements (under Section 287(g) of the Immigration and Naturalization Act) authorizing state or local enforcement personnel to aid in enforcing immigration laws.

Other highlights of the new enforcement priorities include:

  • Expanding use of expedited removal. Expedited removal does not allow for a hearing before an immigration judge and has been used for aliens apprehended at or near the border and individuals apprehend within 14 days and 100 miles of the border;
  • Prosecuting parents who directly or indirectly facilitate smuggling of unaccompanied minor children to the U.S.;
  • Ending “Catch and Release,” which allowed inadmissible aliens to enter the U.S. while awaiting adjudication; and
  • Requiring that most aliens be detained while awaiting adjudication of their cases.

Implementation of these priority changes may not be immediate. The hiring of an additional 10,000 ICE officers and 5,000 CBP officers will require significant budget allocations. Expanding expedited removal will require notice and comment rulemaking. Moreover, these new priorities do not account for the ongoing problem of a severely overburdened immigration court system. In 2004, there were 168,000 cases pending. Currently, there are more than 500,000 cases pending, with non-detained docket cases not heard for two-to-five years.

Jackson Lewis is monitoring implementation of the enhanced enforcement priorities memos and the effect these have on employers and their workforce. Please contact us if you have any questions.

©2017 Jackson Lewis P.C. This Update is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice nor does it create an attorney/client relationship between Jackson Lewis and any readers or recipients. Readers should consult counsel of their own choosing to discuss how these matters relate to their individual circumstances. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without the express written consent of Jackson Lewis.

This Update may be considered attorney advertising in some states. Furthermore, prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Jackson Lewis P.C. represents management exclusively in workplace law and related litigation. Our attorneys are available to assist employers in their compliance efforts and to represent employers in matters before state and federal courts and administrative agencies. For more information, please contact the attorney(s) listed or the Jackson Lewis attorney with whom you regularly work.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

June 13, 2017

Supreme Court: Gender-Based Distinctions in Immigration Law Violate Equal Protection

June 13, 2017

A federal citizenship statute setting different residency requirements for U.S. citizen fathers and mothers seeking to transmit birthright citizenship to their non-marital children born outside the U.S. violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled. Sessions v. Morales-Santana, No. 15-1191 (... Read More

May 11, 2017

How to Prepare for Heightened Immigration Enforcement and Compliance in the Trump Era

May 11, 2017

When Donald Trump announced he would be running for President of the United States in June 2015, immigration became a hotter topic. Throughout his campaign, Trump made many statements about immigration. He focused primarily on undocumented aliens who enter the country illegally and on investigating abuses of visa programs that he... Read More

April 27, 2017

45 Ways in 100 Days: The Projected Impact of the Trump Administration on Today’s Workplace

April 27, 2017

April 29, 2017, marks the 100th day of Donald Trump as the 45th President of the United States. He has proven he is not a traditional conservative Republican, and many in the business community are still wondering about the Trump Administration’s labor and employment policy positions. Even as significant changes in federal policies are... Read More

Related Practices