Search form

New Puerto Rico Labor Department Religious Accommodation Regulations Effective May 25

By Maralyssa Álvarez-Sánchez and Sara E. Colón-Acevedo
  • May 23, 2017

The Employment Law Reform enacted earlier this year in Puerto Rico introduced a local requirement to accommodate an employee’s observance of religious practices or beliefs. (See our article, Top 20 Things You Should Know About the Proposed Puerto Rico Employment Law Reform.) The law directed the Secretary of the Puerto Rico Department of Labor to draft regulations for compliance with these provisions. These final regulations were recently published and are effective on May 25, 2017.

“Excessive Difficulty” Exception

Puerto Rico law now requires an employer to reasonably accommodate an employee’s religious practice or belief, unless it presents an “excessive difficulty” for the employer. This standard is not necessarily the same as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act’s “undue burden” exception for accommodation of religious beliefs or practices.

Under the local regulations, “excessive difficulty” requires the employer to prove that a given accommodation would involve major costs, create dangerous conditions, or impede the employee from being able to execute functions for which the employee was hired. It is the employer’s burden to establish that a denied accommodation is unreasonable, and the assumption that other employees with the same religious beliefs may need the same accommodation is not “excessive difficulty.”

Procedure for Requesting Accommodation

A request for religious accommodation must be in writing and contain a description of the religious activity, the accommodation requested, and the frequency of the accommodation. The request also must be delivered with reasonable anticipation. An employer must respond to any such request in writing within seven business days, unless the religious practice will occur before that time. Failure to respond within this time creates a presumption that the request was granted by the employer. Any denial must be in writing and explain the reasoning and the excessive difficulty justifying such denial. An employer may deny a request if the employee insists on the most onerous accommodation.


In additional to existing remedies for religious discrimination, under the new regulations, an aggrieved employee can file a complaint against an employer for violations of these provisions before the PR-DOL Labor Standards Bureau, which shall investigate and request an employer’s response within 10 calendar days. An employer’s failure to respond or a finding of violation will result in a referral to the PR-DOL Office of Mediation and Adjudication for adjudicative proceedings.

A finding of a violation will result in a fine of a minimum of $1,000 and a maximum of $5,000 in addition to an order to accommodate the religious practice.


Employers should ensure that their procedures for requesting religious accommodation comply with the tight deadline imposed by the regulation. Jackson Lewis attorneys are available to answer inquiries regarding this and other workplace developments.

©2017 Jackson Lewis P.C. This Update is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice nor does it create an attorney/client relationship between Jackson Lewis and any readers or recipients. Readers should consult counsel of their own choosing to discuss how these matters relate to their individual circumstances. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without the express written consent of Jackson Lewis.

This Update may be considered attorney advertising in some states. Furthermore, prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Jackson Lewis P.C. represents management exclusively in workplace law and related litigation. Our attorneys are available to assist employers in their compliance efforts and to represent employers in matters before state and federal courts and administrative agencies. For more information, please contact the attorney(s) listed or the Jackson Lewis attorney with whom you regularly work.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

November 10, 2017

The Speak Out Evolution from Ms. Magazine to #MeToo: The Time Is Now for Employers to Re-Examine Their Practices

November 10, 2017

In a November 5, 2017 article, The New York Times harkened back to the 1977 Ms. magazine cover depicting sexual harassment on its cover. The point was to illustrate the fact that the 1977 Ms. cover is just as relevant today as it was then. In 1986, more than 20 years after the enactment of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the U.S. ... Read More

October 30, 2017

Chicago Adopts ‘Hands Off Pants On’ Law to Protect Hotel Workers from Sexual Harassment, Assault

October 30, 2017

To provide hospitality workers greater protections against sexual harassment and assault, the Chicago City Council passed the “Hands Off Pants On” Ordinance on October 11, 2017. The Ordinance requires all hotels in the City to adopt a panic button system and an anti-sexual harassment policy. The Ordinance was passed after months of... Read More

October 24, 2017

California Adds ‘Transgender,’ ‘Gender Nonconforming Individuals’ to Sexual Harassment Prevention Training for Supervisors

October 24, 2017

Employers subject to California’s mandatory sexual harassment training requirement for supervisors will need to ensure their programs include prevention of harassment based on gender identity, gender expression, and sexual orientation following an amendment (SB 396) to California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). On October 15... Read More

Related Practices