Search form

Supreme Court Returns Affordable Care Act Contraceptive-Coverage Cases to Lower Courts

By Lisa M. deFilippis
  • June 1, 2016

The U.S. Supreme Court has unanimously remanded a consolidated appeal of seven cases addressing the contraceptive-coverage “accommodation” for religious organizations under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) to the Courts of Appeals. Zubik v. Burwell, No. 14-1418 (May 16, 2016).

In the unsigned per curiam decision, the Court directed the lower courts to consider on remand the new information presented in the parties’ post-oral argument briefs it ordered on March 29. The petitioners in each of these cases are religiously-affiliated nonprofit organizations.

The contraceptive-coverage accommodation allows religious organizations to opt out of ACA’s mandate for contraceptive coverage by applying for an exemption, which the petitioners argued violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. The religious organizations argued that the accommodation process “substantially burdens” religious belief by forcing them to notify their insurance companies, plan administrators, or the government of their intent to seek the exemption.

The Court stated that the parties had agreed in their briefs to a regulatory compromise originally suggested by the Court in its March 29 order. The high court’s workaround would permit an objecting religious nonprofit employer to contract with its insurance provider for a health insurance plan that excludes contraceptives. The insurer, in turn, would provide the contraceptive coverage directly to the nonprofit organization’s employees, with no further action or notice required from the organization.

The Court further provided that until the lower courts rule on the cases, the government could consider the petitioners as having provided adequate notice of their religious objection and, in accordance with the ACA and its regulations, offer contraceptive coverage at no cost to the nonprofits’ employees through the nonprofits’ insurance providers. The Court’s ruling also stayed the imposition of any fines the petitioners might face for failing to comply with the notice requirements.

Additionally, pending the lower court rulings, the government can continue to act on notices of religious objection provided by other religious nonprofits by providing no-cost contraceptive coverage through the nonprofits’ insurance providers in accordance with the ACA regulations.

Religious nonprofits that object to providing contraceptive coverage to their employees, but are not among the petitioners in Zubik or the petitioners in 13 similar cases that the high court has not yet agreed to hear, should consider providing appropriate notice of religious objection to the government in accordance with current ACA regulations. The risk of incurring penalties as a result of noncompliance, however, may be limited at this time, as the high court appears to be championing a compromise solution.

Please contact Jackson Lewis with any questions about the ACA and its requirements.

©2016 Jackson Lewis P.C. This Update is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice nor does it create an attorney/client relationship between Jackson Lewis and any readers or recipients. Readers should consult counsel of their own choosing to discuss how these matters relate to their individual circumstances. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without the express written consent of Jackson Lewis.

This Update may be considered attorney advertising in some states. Furthermore, prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Jackson Lewis P.C. represents management exclusively in workplace law and related litigation. Our attorneys are available to assist employers in their compliance efforts and to represent employers in matters before state and federal courts and administrative agencies. For more information, please contact the attorney(s) listed or the Jackson Lewis attorney with whom you regularly work.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

November 16, 2017

Puerto Rico Labor Department Updates Regulations on Payment of Annual (Christmas) Bonus

November 16, 2017

Employers in Puerto Rico must comply with updated regulations on the payment of the generally required annual bonus to eligible employees. The Puerto Rico Department of Labor (DOL) updated the regulations, effective October 18, 2017, following legislation adopted early in the year. Under Puerto Rico Act No. 148 of 1969, employers in... Read More

October 26, 2017

Puerto Rico Agencies Issue Employee-Related Guidance, Tax Relief in Wake of Hurricane

October 26, 2017

The passage of Hurricane María through Puerto Rico in September 2017 left catastrophic damages. In an effort to encourage employer assistance and provide temporary economic relief to employees in Puerto Rico, local government agencies have issued the following measures and guidance related to employers concerning their employees.... Read More

September 7, 2017

Employee Benefits Newsletter – Summer/Fall 2017

September 7, 2017

In this issue: Proving Loss Causation in Breach of Fiduciary Claims – The Split Widens. Analysis of recent litigation trends involving loss causation, an important burden-of-proof issue in ERISA fiduciary claims. Executive Compensation and Employee Benefits in Mergers and Acquisitions. A summary of the most significant compensation... Read More

Related Practices