Search form

Travel Update under Trump’s Executive Order

By Michael H. Neifach, Amy L. Peck and William J. Manning
  • February 2, 2017

While daily governmental guidance for affected individuals, in the United States and abroad, has followed the signing of Executive Order “Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States” on January 27, 2017, reports of inconsistent treatment of individuals abound. The following illustrates some of the confusion regarding individuals “from” Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen.

New Temporary Restraining Order

In the evening on January 31, the U.S. District Court in Los Angeles issued a temporary restraining order enjoining certain parts of the EO. Judge Andre Birotte, Jr.’s order requires the government to allow people to enter the United States who have valid immigrant visas — i.e., individuals who have been approved for legal permanent residence and are entering the U.S. for the first time in their new status on immigrant visas. The TRO appears to apply nationally. The Department of Homeland Security’s interpretation of the ruling is expected.

Green Card Holders

On February 1, the White House Counsel issued “authoritative guidance” stating that Green Card holders will no longer be subject to the Executive Order. They will no longer need the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security’s “categorical waiver,” according to that announcement. This guidance likely was issued because of continued reports of intense scrutiny at secondary inspection and even reports of individuals being asked to surrender their Green Cards. We await clarification on whether this is meant to apply to individuals covered in Judge Birotte’s order as well.

Visa Interview Waiver Program

Based upon statutory exceptions in the EO, the Visa Office clarified that certain visa interview waivers would remain available to applicants under the age of 14 or over the age of 79 and to persons whose visas expired within the past 12 months applying in the same category. Nevertheless, anyone applying for a visa should check with the relevant Consulate regarding the applicability of any visa interview waiver program.

Dual Nationals

DHS has stated that dual nationals “from” the seven countries were subject to the EO’s travel ban, but that Customs and Border Patrol would process people “based on how they present themselves at primary inspection.” Persons presenting their “non-restricted country” passport will be treated as citizens of the non-restricted country. U.S. citizens who are dual nationals should not be subject to the restrictions. Reports of dual nationals subjected to inconsistent treatment by CBP continue.

Benefit Processing

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services may continue to process visa applications and even to conduct interviews for individuals “from” the seven countries, but final decisions will be deferred, according to reports. There may be an exception for citizenship applications. However, the Department of State announced the National Visa Center has cancelled all scheduled immigrant visa interviews for February, whether family- or employment-based, including fiancé visa interviews.

The situation is in flux and is subject to further changes. Individuals from the seven countries who are in the United States and are planning to travel outside the country should consult an attorney before leaving.

Jackson Lewis attorneys will provide further updates. Please contact your Jackson Lewis attorney with any questions.

©2017 Jackson Lewis P.C. This Update is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice nor does it create an attorney/client relationship between Jackson Lewis and any readers or recipients. Readers should consult counsel of their own choosing to discuss how these matters relate to their individual circumstances. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without the express written consent of Jackson Lewis.

This Update may be considered attorney advertising in some states. Furthermore, prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Jackson Lewis P.C. represents management exclusively in workplace law and related litigation. Our attorneys are available to assist employers in their compliance efforts and to represent employers in matters before state and federal courts and administrative agencies. For more information, please contact the attorney(s) listed or the Jackson Lewis attorney with whom you regularly work.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

March 22, 2017

Senate HELP Committee Holds Confirmation Hearing for Nominee Acosta to Head Labor Department

March 22, 2017

The Senate Health, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee on March 22, 2017, held confirmation hearings on the nomination of R. Alexander Acosta, President Donald Trump’s pick for Secretary of Labor. Acosta was introduced by Senators Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz, both of whom have known Acosta for years. Rubio described Acosta as... Read More

March 13, 2017

Supreme Court Sends Transgender Student Case Back to Lower Court; Other Case Worth Watching

March 13, 2017

Following revocation of Obama Administration transgender guidance, the U.S. Supreme Court has vacated the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit’s determination that a transgender student had shown a likelihood of success on the merits and the school district probably was violating Title IX by reserving boys’ restrooms... Read More

March 7, 2017

Senate Votes to Disapprove Obama-Era Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces Executive Order

March 7, 2017

The U.S. Senate has passed, by a single-vote margin, a joint resolution previously passed by the U.S. House that “disapproves” President Barack Obama’s 2014 Executive Order 13673: Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces, often called the “blacklisting” executive order. (For more on Executive Order 13673, see our... Read More

Related Practices