Search form

Maryland Employers to Provide Pregnant Workers with Accommodation under New Law

By Richard J. Hafets
  • September 24, 2013

Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley has signed into law the Reasonable Accommodations for Disabilities Due to Pregnancy Law. The law, which becomes effective on October 1, 2013, amends the Maryland Fair Employment Practices Act and creates new burdens for employers beyond those required under federal law. Maryland joins a growing number of states that mandate employers provide some form of accommodation to pregnant workers. (E.g., see California Issues Amended Pregnancy Regulations, Extends Coverage to Perceived Pregnancy.) Significantly, as illustrated by the new Maryland law, these state laws impose different and arguably greater obligations than such federal laws as the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (“PDA”) and the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), even after passage of the ADA Amendments Act (“ADAAA”). 

Federal Law 

The PDA prohibits discrimination based on pregnancy as it relates to any aspect of employment, including hiring, firing, pay, job assignments, promotions, layoff, training, benefits (such as leave and health insurance) and any other term or condition of employment. Under the PDA, most courts have held that if a woman is temporarily unable to perform her job due to a medical condition related to pregnancy or childbirth, the employer must treat her in the same way as it treats any other similarly situated temporarily disabled employee. Most courts have not read the PDA to impose an affirmative obligation to provide accommodations to pregnant workers where no such accommodations are afforded to employees with other temporarily disabling conditions.

Further, the ADA generally does not require employers to offer individuals reasonable accommodations if they are temporarily disabled due to a “normal” pregnancy. This is because a “normal” pregnancy is not an “impairment” under the ADA and, therefore, cannot be a disability that would trigger ADA reasonable accommodation obligations. However, especially after the passage of the ADAAA, medical impairments resulting from pregnancy (e.g., gestational diabetes) could be sufficient to trigger ADA reasonable accommodation obligations for some pregnancy-related conditions. Even then, however, the ADA reasonable accommodation obligations may be more limited than those under state pregnancy accommodation laws, including Maryland’s new law. 

Maryland’s New Law 

Generally, the new Maryland law requires employers with at least 15 employees to provide accommodations to an employee with a disability caused by or contributed to by pregnancy, unless the accommodation would impose an undue hardship on the employer’s business. If a pregnant employee requests a reasonable accommodation, the employer must explore with the employee all possible means of providing the accommodation, including: 

  • Changing the employee’s job duties or work hours; 
  • Relocating the employee’s work area; 
  • Providing mechanical or electrical aids; 
  • Transferring the employee to a less strenuous or less hazardous position; or 
  • Providing leave. 

The new law establishes special “rules” for transfer requests. If an employee with a pregnancy-related disability requests a transfer to a less strenuous or less hazardous position, the employer must transfer the employee for a period up to the duration of the employee’s pregnancy if the employer has a policy, practice or collective bargaining agreement requiring or authorizing the transfer of a temporarily disabled employee to a less strenuous or less hazardous position for the duration of the disability. For example, an employer that has a practice of offering light duty in certain circumstances (such as for work-related injuries) could be required to extend light duty to an employee with a disability caused by or contributed to by pregnancy.

Further, where an employer does not have such policy, practice or collective bargaining agreement requiring or authorizing the transfer, but the employee’s health care provider advises the transfer, the employer must transfer the employee, unless doing so would: 

(a) create additional employment that the employer would not otherwise have created; 

(b) cause an employee to be discharged; 

(c) cause the transfer of an employee with greater seniority than the employee requesting the accommodation; or 

(d) promote any employee who is not qualified to perform the job.

Medical Certification

Under the new law, employers may require an employee to provide a certification from the employee’s health care provider concerning the medical advisability of a reasonable accommodation to the same extent a certification is required for other temporary disabilities. According to the law, a certification must include: 

(1) the date the reasonable accommodation became medically advisable; 

(2) the probable duration of the reasonable accommodation; and 

(3) an explanatory statement as to the medical advisability of the reasonable accommodation. 

Posting and Notice Requirements

Under the new law, an employer must post in a conspicuous location, and include in any employee handbook that the employer maintains, information concerning a pregnant employee’s rights to reasonable accommodation, including leave. 

The Maryland Commission on Civil Rights (“MCCR”) will not issue a poster by October 1, 2013. The MCCR’s Guidance on the handbook and notice requirements (available at states that the MCCR is not directed to create a poster; however, the MCCR indicates that it is reviewing all anti-discrimination posters and that it will eventually create a poster to address employee’s rights under the new law. In the interim, the MCCR suggests that employers consult legal counsel regarding the handbook and posting requirements. 

What Should Maryland Employers Do?

Maryland employers should consider taking the following actions: 

  • Reviewing with counsel their policies on reasonable accommodation; 
  • Reviewing their policies, practices or contractual agreements with respect to alternative work arrangements or restricted/light duty programs; 
  • Reconsidering their policies and practices regarding obtaining medical certification; 
  • Reviewing and revising any employee handbooks to ensure compliance with the new law’s handbook notice requirement;
  • Working with counsel to develop a poster that complies with the Law; and
  • Training managers and supervisors regarding procedures for responding to accommodation requests from pregnant employees.

Jackson Lewis attorneys are available to assist you on this and other workplace law developments. If you have questions about the new Maryland Law’s requirements or need assistance in complying with the Law, please contact the Jackson Lewis attorney with whom you regularly work. Jackson Lewis’ Disability, Leave and Health Management practice will continue to monitor this and other similar state laws impacting employer obligations when managing pregnancy-related disabilities.

©2013 Jackson Lewis P.C. This Update is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice nor does it create an attorney/client relationship between Jackson Lewis and any readers or recipients. Readers should consult counsel of their own choosing to discuss how these matters relate to their individual circumstances. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without the express written consent of Jackson Lewis.

This Update may be considered attorney advertising in some states. Furthermore, prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Jackson Lewis P.C. represents management exclusively in workplace law and related litigation. Our attorneys are available to assist employers in their compliance efforts and to represent employers in matters before state and federal courts and administrative agencies. For more information, please contact the attorney(s) listed or the Jackson Lewis attorney with whom you regularly work.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

November 7, 2017

Mayor Signs Law Adding Safe Time to NYC Earned Sick Time

November 7, 2017

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio signed Intro 1313-A into law, requiring employers to provide paid time off for hours taken in connection with family offense matters, sexual offenses, stalking, and human trafficking, grouped collectively as “Safe Time.” On November 6, 2017, NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio signed into law Intro 1313-A, an... Read More

October 18, 2017

New York City Council Expands Earned Sick Time Law to Include Safe Time

October 18, 2017

New York City’s Earned Sick Time Act (also known as the Paid Sick Leave Law) will require employers to allow employees to use paid time off for “Safe Time” under an amendment (Int. 1313-A) passed by the New York City Council on October 17, 2017. Under the revised law (the “Earned Safe and Sick Time Act”), employers will be required to... Read More

October 6, 2017

Rhode Island Enacts Paid Sick Leave Law

October 6, 2017

Rhode Island has joined the growing list of states and municipalities that have enacted paid sick leave laws. Under the Healthy and Safe Families and Workplaces Act, signed by Governor Gina Raimondo, employers with at least 18 employees must provide their employees with paid sick leave. The new law goes into effect July 1, 2018.... Read More