Search form

New York Employers Must Issue First Annual Wage Theft Prevention Act Notice in January 2012

By Felice B. Ekelman, Jeffrey W. Brecher, Richard I. Greenberg, Jonathan M. Kozak, Noel P. Tripp and Craig S. Roberts
  • December 8, 2011

New York’s landmark Wage Theft Prevention Act requires employers to issue to all New York employees an annual notice complying with the requirements of New York Labor Law § 195 (as amended by the Act).  The statute became effective in April 2011 and the first annual notice must be provided prior to February 1, 2012.  The notice obligations are discussed in our article, New York Wage Theft Prevention Act Update: State DOL Issues Model Forms and Guidance.  Notice can be provided electronically as long as certain requirements are met.

While the law does not dictate the form of notice, the New York State Department of Labor has provided sample forms.  In addition to English, the NYSDOL has provided sample forms in other languages, consistent with the requirement that the notice be provided in English and in the employee’s “primary language.”  Failure to provide the annual notice constitutes a violation the Wage Theft Act (Section 198(1-b)) and can carry a penalty of “fifty dollars for each work week that the violations occurred or continue to occur,” among other potential remedies.

Large employers, and employers with a large virtual or remote segment in their workforce, have been wrestling with creating a compliant notice program under the Act.  The absence of clear guidance regarding certain provisions and requirements makes this task more difficult.

And for employers who also have operations in California, the state has adopted a law nearly identical to New York’s.  The California Wage Theft Prevention Act, effective January 1, 2012, increases the penalties available under existing provisions of the California Labor Code, and adds a detailed notice requirement to employees, echoing the requirements imposed on New York employers by N.Y. Labor Law § 195.  For more information on the California Wage Theft Prevention Act, see California Enacts Eerily Familiar "Wage Theft Prevention Act".

Jackson Lewis attorneys are available to assist employers with their compliance efforts.

©2011 Jackson Lewis P.C. This Update is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice nor does it create an attorney/client relationship between Jackson Lewis and any readers or recipients. Readers should consult counsel of their own choosing to discuss how these matters relate to their individual circumstances. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without the express written consent of Jackson Lewis.

This Update may be considered attorney advertising in some states. Furthermore, prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Jackson Lewis P.C. represents management exclusively in workplace law and related litigation. Our attorneys are available to assist employers in their compliance efforts and to represent employers in matters before state and federal courts and administrative agencies. For more information, please contact the attorney(s) listed or the Jackson Lewis attorney with whom you regularly work.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

October 13, 2017

NYC Issues Additional Guidance on Upcoming Salary Inquiry Prohibitions

October 13, 2017

Effective October 31, 2017, New York City employers generally may not inquire about or rely upon a job applicant’s salary history in making employment decisions. The New York City Commission on Human Rights (NYCCHR) previously released an Employer Fact Sheet and a Job Applicant Fact Sheet to assist employers and employees with... Read More

October 4, 2017

Retail Industry Workplace Law Update – Fall 2017

October 4, 2017

Oregon Enacts Scheduling Legislation Oregon has become the first U.S. state to regulate employer scheduling practices in the retail, food service, and hospitality industries. Read full article… States Strengthen Protections for Pregnant Workers Employers should plan to comply with changes to Connecticut, Massachusetts, and... Read More

October 3, 2017

New York Court: Minimum Wage Due for All On-Premises Hours Required of Non-Resident Home Care Attendants

October 3, 2017

In a significant blow to the home health care industry in New York, non-resident home health care attendants must be paid minimum wage for all hours they are required to remain at the client’s home, including hours when they may be sleeping, eating, or performing other personal tasks, the Brooklyn-based Appellate Division, Second... Read More

Related Practices