Search form

OSHA Seeks to Establish New Whistleblower Committee

By David R. Jimenez
  • May 31, 2012

The U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has announced a plan to establish a Whistleblower Protection Advisory Committee. The Committee will be charged with advising, consulting with, and making recommendations to the Secretary of Labor, Hilda L. Solis, and the Assistant Secretary of Labor for OSHA, Dr. David Michaels, on ways to improve OSHA’s administration of 21 different whistleblower statutes, including those in the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH Act), the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA), and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010.  The recommendations will focus on ways to improve the efficiency, effectiveness and transparency of OSHA’s administration of whistleblower protections associated with the various statutes.

This announcement is part of a major overhaul prompted by a Government Accountability Office audit and appears to be funded in the DOL’s proposed budget for the 2013 fiscal year.  A federal register notice of the announcement may be viewed here.

The Committee will advise on the development and implementation of improved customer service to both workers who raise complaints and employers who are the subject of investigations, improvements in the investigative and enforcement process, and improvements in the fairness, efficiency and transparency of investigations. The composition and start date of the Committee is not yet known. Once established, the Committee will be bound by the Federal Advisory Committee Act, which requires public meetings. As the number of whistleblower statutes and claims continues to increase, it is important employers and their counsel strive to be represented in these meetings and have their voices heard.

For employers, this development signals a continuing regulatory focus on employees as a means to deter, detect, and enforce federal regulations.  This, along with other efforts dedicated to enhancing OSHA’s whistleblower programs, is proof that OSHA is committed fully to leveraging information from employees as a vital resource and enforcement asset.  Employers are well-advised to review their compliance programs with specific attention to two key areas:

(1) their internal reporting mechanisms, commonly known as “hotlines;” and
(2) their institutional framework for guarding against and enforcing the organization’s anti-retaliation policies. 

The more effective these internal controls, the better equipped the organization will be to defend against whistleblower claims.
The Jackson Lewis Corporate Governance and Internal Investigation Practice advises employers on the development and continuous improvement of compliance programs and internal controls, and defends employers against whistleblower claims filed before OSHA, as well as whistleblower claims filed in federal court.

©2012 Jackson Lewis P.C. This Update is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice nor does it create an attorney/client relationship between Jackson Lewis and any readers or recipients. Readers should consult counsel of their own choosing to discuss how these matters relate to their individual circumstances. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without the express written consent of Jackson Lewis.

This Update may be considered attorney advertising in some states. Furthermore, prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Jackson Lewis P.C. represents management exclusively in workplace law and related litigation. Our attorneys are available to assist employers in their compliance efforts and to represent employers in matters before state and federal courts and administrative agencies. For more information, please contact the attorney(s) listed or the Jackson Lewis attorney with whom you regularly work.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

June 17, 2016

Supreme Court Unanimously Backs ‘Implied Certification’ Liability under False Claims Act

June 17, 2016

Federal contractors may be subject to liability under the federal False Claims Act for violating regulatory requirements not expressly stated in their contracts, according to U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Universal Health Services v. Escobar, No. 15-7 (June 16, 2016). The Court unanimously adopted the “implied... Read More

February 10, 2016

Former Employee’s SOX Whistleblower Claim Fails, Federal Appeals Court Rules

February 10, 2016

Finding a former employee failed to “put up” sufficient facts to support the nexus between his termination and whistleblower activity protected by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), the federal appeals court in Philadelphia, in effect, has told him to “shut up,” affirming summary judgment unanimously in favor of the... Read More

September 16, 2015

Split Appeals Court Decision May Set Stage for Supreme Court Review of Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Provision

September 16, 2015

A federal appeals court ruling on the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“DFA”) may prompt U.S. Supreme Court review as to when an employee whistleblower is entitled to the benefits of the anti-retaliation provisions of the DFA. In a two-to-one decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second... Read More