Search form

Two Newly Proposed Agency Rules Threaten to Hamper Employer Communications before Union Elections

By Philip B. Rosen and Thomas V. Walsh
  • June 21, 2011

The National Labor Relations Board has formally issued proposed rule changes that, if adopted, will drastically expedite the union election process.  The employer community has anticipated the NLRB’s move to seek to expedite the representation election process.  At recent Congressional hearings, Chairman Wilma Liebman hinted that such action was under active consideration.

Among other things, the Board proposes the following changes to the current process:

  • Accelerate the initial hearing date following the filing of a representation petition;
  • Mandate expansive pre-hearing discovery of issues;
  • Significantly curtail the ability to litigate issues before an election;
  • Eliminate the right to file post-hearing briefs;
  • Bar pre-election requests to review regional decisions;
  • Require lists of eligible voters be filed within only two days; and
  • Provide the union with voters’ phone numbers, e-mail addresses, and more.

Approximately 95 percent of all representation elections are held in 56 days.  The new procedures, if adopted, could shave approximately 30 days.  Under these changes, it appears elections could be held in slightly over three weeks (or possibly less) from the filing of a petition.

This is a profound change.  It has been long recognized that the more opportunity employees have to learn about unions and collective bargaining, the less likely they are to vote for union representation.  The proposed changes would cut that time by 50 percent. The need for employers to promote preventive labor relations in advance of union organizing is more important than ever. 

Employers’ ability to communicate with their employees also may become more challenging.  It is no coincidence that the Department of Labor has proposed a new rule that would make more activity of attorneys, consultants, and employers publicly reportable.  The Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA) requires reporting of arrangements, receipts, and expenditures derived from providing services called “persuader activity.”  Historically, attorney legal advice regarding lawful employer communications has been exempt from this LMRDA reporting requirement.  The DOL’s proposed rules would severely curtail this advice exception, rendering much of the advice provided by attorneys “reportable” under the law.  It is irrelevant that the employer’s communication is lawful.

For more than 50 years Jackson Lewis has counseled and advised employers with respect to their protected right to free speech and communication with their employees concerning the exercise of their rights to organize and bargain collectively.  Most companies and their law firms have fit within the legal advice exclusion over the years. This is likely to change if these new rules are adopted.

The impact of the proposed DOL rule will be to inhibit employers from effectively and lawfully communicating facts and opinions to employees prior to elections.  That, combined with the NLRB’s accelerated election procedure, will diminish greatly employees’ opportunities to obtain the information they need to make an informed choice in an NLRB election.

There is a 60-day public comment period for both proposals, followed by agency analysis and consideration, before final rules are promulgated.  The final rules are subject to court review.

Jackson Lewis attorneys will be working with the employer community to prepare comments to both rules and in any subsequent litigation. 

©2011 Jackson Lewis P.C. This Update is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice nor does it create an attorney/client relationship between Jackson Lewis and any readers or recipients. Readers should consult counsel of their own choosing to discuss how these matters relate to their individual circumstances. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without the express written consent of Jackson Lewis.

This Update may be considered attorney advertising in some states. Furthermore, prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Jackson Lewis P.C. represents management exclusively in workplace law and related litigation. Our attorneys are available to assist employers in their compliance efforts and to represent employers in matters before state and federal courts and administrative agencies. For more information, please contact the attorney(s) listed or the Jackson Lewis attorney with whom you regularly work.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

April 28, 2017

union kNOw – April 2017

April 28, 2017

Second ‘Day Without Immigrants’ Protests and Strikes to Take Place on May 1 Building off of what organizers see a successful February 16 ‘Day Without Immigrants,’ a second series of protests and strikes has been scheduled for May 1. For more information on similar recent activities and strategies on how to respond lawfully to the... Read More

April 27, 2017

45 Ways in 100 Days: The Projected Impact of the Trump Administration on Today’s Workplace

April 27, 2017

April 29, 2017, marks the 100th day of Donald Trump as the 45th President of the United States. He has proven he is not a traditional conservative Republican, and many in the business community are still wondering about the Trump Administration’s labor and employment policy positions. Even as significant changes in federal policies are... Read More

April 27, 2017

Federal Court: NLRB Correct That Successor Employer Must Bargain with Existing Union under Labor Law

April 27, 2017

In the first test of the National Labor Relations Board’s 2011 “successor bar” rule, the federal appeals court in Boston has upheld the NLRB’s decision that the union is protected from decertification after a change of ownership at the unionized company for at least six months. National Labor Relations Board v. Lily Transp. Corp., No. 15... Read More

Related Practices