Search form

11th Circuit Upholds Mining Agency’s Coal Dust Rule, Phase-In Continues

  • February 16, 2016

The Mine Safety and Health Administration may continue phasing-in its new coal dust rules, a three-judge panel of the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has decided, relying on what it called a “holistic interpretation” of the Mine Act to uphold MSHA’s new rules. National Mining Association, et al. v. Sec’y of Labor, et al., No. 14-11942 (Jan. 25, 2016). The rule expands sampling requirements, changes sampling methods and tools, lowers permissible exposure limits, and requires immediate corrective actions by mine operators.

The National Mining Association (NMA), Murray Energy Corp., and associated coal interests, challenged MSHA’s extensive new rules as not supported by the evidence in record, not feasible, and contrary to the Mine Act. The industry challenged, among other provisions:

  1. the use of single dust samples to determine compliance and MSHA’s declaration that single sample results are “accurate”;
  2. the adoption of a reduced dust limit;
  3. the collection of an increased number of mandated samples, taken under higher production rates than current sampling;
  4. the use a new, instantaneous read-out, sampling device; and
  5. the agency’s refusal to accept personal protective equipment as a compliance method.

The industry stressed that the rules must be feasible but were not, and that the Mine Act specifically required the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), through the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), to set the exposure limit and issue a joint finding with MSHA on single-sample accuracy, rather authorize MSHA to act alone.

MSHA and HHS/NIOSH acted jointly in making previous, single-shift sampling accuracy findings, including a rulemaking invalidated by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in 1998. In that case, the court accepted NMA’s argument that an economic feasibility analysis was required under the Mine Act (Section 101, the Act’s general rulemaking provision), but not conducted.

In the current case, the three-judge panel invoked this earlier decision to support its ruling. According to the judges, Section 101(a) unambiguously accords MSHA alone with authority to promulgate new regulations. “It is clearly the law of this circuit that the transition to a single-shift sampling regime is a matter to be promulgated by MSHA alone,” they wrote. “In holding squarely that this matter is governed by section 101 … National Mining [the earlier case] forecloses any other result,” the Court said.

The industry parties have not gone away quietly. Describing the 1998 single-sample case as “far more limited than the Panel portrays,” and calling the new decision “an unfortunate error of law,” Jackson Lewis attorney Henry Chajet said, “The Panel decision uses this misread precedent to support the deletion of the Mine Act’s clear Congressional delegation of coal dust and single sample rulemaking to HHS/NIOSH, while justifying the result by saying NIOSH was consulted and that sufficed.” Chajet, who represented NMA on behalf of the firm, added, “Yet, there is no language in the [Mine] Act, the APA [Administrative Procedure Act], or any other statute that permits an agency to bypass a direct Congressional delegation of authority to another agency.”

A spokesman for Murray Energy (one of the petitioners in the case) vowed to continue the challenge. The petitioners could seek en banc review by the full court of the Eleventh Circuit, based on their belief that the three-judge panel misread the statute or misapplied U.S. Supreme Court precedent regarding controlling, express words of a statute. The petitioners also could seek review by the Supreme Court.

The decision allows MSHA to continue its rollout of the rule, which the agency is doing in phases. Phase 1, effective in August 2014, required sampling during high production periods and ushered in single sampling. Phase 2 began February 1, 2016, and requires much more sampling as well as use of a newly developed monitoring device that measures dust levels instantaneously. This monitoring device has been the subject of concerns over its accuracy. Finally, a lower permissible exposure limit goes into effect this coming August 1.

Contact a member of our Workplace Safety and Health practice if you have any questions about this decision or the next level of sampling required by MSHA.

©2016 Jackson Lewis P.C. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Jackson Lewis and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Reproduction of this material in whole or in part is prohibited without the express prior written consent of Jackson Lewis P.C., a law firm that built its reputation on providing workplace law representation to management. Founded in 1958, the firm has grown to more than 900 attorneys in major cities nationwide serving clients across a wide range of practices and industries including government relations, healthcare and sports law. More information about Jackson Lewis can be found at www.jacksonlewis.com.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

June 25, 2019

The Aging Construction Industry: Keeping Skilled Employees Longer

June 25, 2019

Workers in the construction industry tend to be older than those in other industries, according to the National Association of Home Builders. The median age of construction workers is 42 years old, a year older than the median in the national labor force. Further, the median age of workers in the industry is 44-45 years old in several U.... Read More

January 23, 2019

U.S. House Committee to Focus on Workforce Protections

January 23, 2019

Signaling a renewed emphasis on workforce protections at the opening of the 116th Congress, the U.S. House of Representatives has changed the name of its committee with jurisdiction over labor matters back to the Committee on Education and Labor. It was called the Committee on Education and the Workforce when Republicans held the... Read More

January 7, 2019

2019: The Year Ahead for Employers

January 7, 2019

Over the past year, state and local governments responded in a variety of ways to national policy, and the midterm elections painted a picture of what’s in store for employers in 2019 and beyond. Jackson Lewis’ annual report outlines upcoming issues, trends, legislation and regulations employers need to be aware of in the coming year... Read More

Related Practices