Search form

Birmingham, Alabama, City Council Attempts to Implement Immediate Minimum Wage Increase for All Employers

By David T. Wiley and Thomas A. Davis
  • February 24, 2016

The Birmingham City Council has voted to implement a new ordinance increasing the minimum wage to $10.10 beginning February 24, 2016, for all employers within the city limits.

Administrative requirements, however, may delay implementation of the new ordinance. The ordinance must be signed by the mayor, published in the newspaper, and must meet other administrative requirements, actions that may not be completed before the Alabama legislature’s bill barring city and local government wage laws is signed by the Governor. Alabama has no state minimum wage law.

The Birmingham ordinance originally sought to increase the minimum wage to $8.50 in July 2016, then to $10.10 in July 2017. However, in an apparent effort to circumvent anticipated contrary state law, the Council voted on February 23rd to implement the increase immediately.

The Alabama state legislature is considering a bill that would prohibit city or other local governments from enacting such patchwork wage laws. The state bill already has passed the House of Representatives and is before the Senate. The bill is expected to be passed by the Senate and signed by the Governor before the end of February.

Jackson Lewis encourages all employers with operations in the City of Birmingham to prepare a contingency plan should the City or private litigants attempt to immediately enforce this ordinance. We will continue to keep you apprised of developments. Please contact the attorneys in our Birmingham office or the attorney with whom you regularly work if you have any questions about this or other workplace law development.

©2016 Jackson Lewis P.C. This Update is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice nor does it create an attorney/client relationship between Jackson Lewis and any readers or recipients. Readers should consult counsel of their own choosing to discuss how these matters relate to their individual circumstances. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without the express written consent of Jackson Lewis.

This Update may be considered attorney advertising in some states. Furthermore, prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Jackson Lewis P.C. represents management exclusively in workplace law and related litigation. Our attorneys are available to assist employers in their compliance efforts and to represent employers in matters before state and federal courts and administrative agencies. For more information, please contact the attorney(s) listed or the Jackson Lewis attorney with whom you regularly work.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

June 12, 2018

Nevada Supreme Court Rejects an Interpretation of ‘Health Insurance’ that Would Nullify State Wage System

June 12, 2018

In the last of a series of decisions reached by the Nevada Supreme Court interpreting the Minimum Wage Amendment (“MWA”) to the Nevada Constitution, the Court concluded that an employer may pay the lower of the state’s two-tier minimum wage “if the employer offers health insurance at a cost to the employer of the equivalent of at least... Read More

June 7, 2018

Number of Contingent Workers Inches Higher, DOL Survey Finds

June 7, 2018

The Department of Labor (DOL) has confirmed the gig economy is alive and well, but the number of workers has increased only slightly in the past decade. The DOL released its much-anticipated “Contingent and Alternative Employment Arrangements Survey” report on June 7, 2018. The number of U.S. workers classified as “contingent” (... Read More

May 7, 2018

California Supreme Court Broadens Definition of Employee in Independent Contractor Analysis

May 7, 2018

Diverging from decades-old precedent, the California Supreme Court has broadened the definition of “employee” in the context of the State’s Industrial Work Commission (IWC) wage orders when undertaking the employee-versus-independent contractor analysis. Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 2018 Cal.... Read More

Related Practices