Search form

California Amends Representative PAGA Law, Allows Curing of Certain Wage Statement Violations

By Jonathan A. Siegel
  • October 6, 2015

An amendment to California’s Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (“PAGA”) affords an employer the right to cure certain wage statement violations before an employee may bring a civil suit against the employer.

This is a win for employers. The amendment, AB 1506, provides employers the right to cure a violation of failing to provide its employees with a wage statement containing the inclusive dates of the pay period and the name and address of the legal entity that is the employer, as required under California Labor Code section 226(a). The amendment, signed by Governor Jerry Brown on October 2, 2015, is effective immediately.

California Labor Code section 226(a) requires an employer to provide its employees with specific information regarding their wages either semimonthly or at the time of each wage payment.

Prior to the amendment, the law did not allow employers to cure a violation of Labor Code section 226(a) before an employee could bring a civil action. Thus, employees were allowed to bring civil actions under the PAGA for such violations and the employer would immediately have to defend itself against the action. The newly signed amendment drastically changes the procedures for bringing civil actions under the PAGA for Labor Code section 226(a) violations, including giving the employer notice of and time to cure the violation.

A PAGA claim is a type of government enforcement action where the representative employee acts as the state’s proxy. An employee may bring an action for civil penalties on behalf of the state against his or her employer for Labor Code violations, including violations of California Labor Code section 226(a), committed against the employee and fellow employees, with 75 percent of the proceeds of that litigation going to the state and 25 percent of the proceeds going to the employee who brought the action.

The amendment states that an alleged violation of Labor Code section 226(a) will be considered cured upon a showing that the employer has provided a fully compliant, itemized wage statement to each aggrieved employee as required. The employer must be given notice of and time to cure the alleged violation. The employer may utilize this provision only once for the same violation of the statute during each 12-month period.

The amendment is a further positive development in light of the recent Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling holding that the Federal Arbitration Act does not preempt California’s Iskanian rule, which prohibits waiver of representative claims under the PAGA. For more information regarding the Ninth Circuit’s ruling, please see our article, California Ban on Waiver of Representative PAGA Claims Not Barred by Federal Arbitration Act, Federal Court Holds.

Jackson Lewis attorneys are available to answer inquiries regarding this development and assist employers.

©2015 Jackson Lewis P.C. This Update is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice nor does it create an attorney/client relationship between Jackson Lewis and any readers or recipients. Readers should consult counsel of their own choosing to discuss how these matters relate to their individual circumstances. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without the express written consent of Jackson Lewis.

This Update may be considered attorney advertising in some states. Furthermore, prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Jackson Lewis P.C. represents management exclusively in workplace law and related litigation. Our attorneys are available to assist employers in their compliance efforts and to represent employers in matters before state and federal courts and administrative agencies. For more information, please contact the attorney(s) listed or the Jackson Lewis attorney with whom you regularly work.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

November 12, 2018

New York City Releases Guidance on Mandatory Sexual Harassment Training, Notice Requirements

November 12, 2018

The New York City Commission on Human Rights has released Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) as guidance on the “Stop Sexual Harassment in NYC Act.” New York City employers with at least 15 employees are required to conduct annual anti-sexual harassment training for all employees starting April 1, 2019. Posting and notice requirements... Read More

November 6, 2018

Supreme Court: Age Discrimination in Employment Act Applies to All State, Local Government Employers

November 6, 2018

The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) applies to state and local government employers, regardless of their size, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in a unanimous (8-0) seven-page decision. Mount Lemmon Fire District v. Guido, No. 17-587 (Nov. 6, 2018). The Court’s ruling resolves a significant circuit split among the Sixth,... Read More

November 5, 2018

What Employers Should Watch For in Election 2018

November 5, 2018

Election Day may result in significant changes in our country’s labor and employment landscape. This article discusses some issues employers should watch closely. Arbitration Congressional Democrats have proposed legislation intended to overturn the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2018 ruling that employers do not violate the National Labor... Read More

Related Practices