Search form

California on Brink of Further Expansion of Fair Pay Protections

By Susan E. Groff and Benjamin A. Tulis
  • September 15, 2017

California’s legislature is close to passing three bills to expand the state’s fair pay laws. The bills, introduced in early 2017, were designed to expand upon, or clarify, the amended California Fair Pay Act (CFPA).

The bills include:

  • Assembly Bill (AB) 1209: To require employers with at least 500 employees in California to collect and submit information to the California Secretary of State regarding: (1) the difference between the median and mean salaries of male and female employees located in California who are exempt under the white collar exemptions; and (2) the difference between the median and mean wages of male and female board members who are located in California. The Secretary of State will publish this information on a publicly available website.
  • AB 168: To prohibit employers from seeking salary history from job applicants.
  • AB 46: To amend the CFPA to clarify that its provisions apply to both public and private employers.

While all three bills are moving toward adoption, AB 1209 is the closest.

AB 1209

As of September 11, 2017, an amended version of AB 1209 had passed both the Assembly and the Senate over the written objections of groups representing employers. AB 1209 has been amended as follows:

  • To provide that wage differentials between men and women are not presumed violations of the CFPA or limit an employer’s ability to demonstrate a basis for the wage differential.
  • To require employers to update and republish information biennially on July 1 (as opposed to annually, as provided in the original bill).
  • To provide that the collection of this information is limited to employees and board members located in California (there was no geographic limitation in the original bill).

Governor Jerry Brown has until October 15, 2017, to sign or veto the bill.

AB 168

AB 168 was passed by the Senate on September 12, 2017, and the Assembly is considering the bill.

The bill prohibits employers from seeking job applicants’ salary history. On September 8, 2017, the bill was amended to provide that:

  1. An employer may not rely upon the salary history information of an applicant (unless it is disclosed voluntarily and “without prompting”);
  2. Applicants may voluntarily “and without prompting” disclose salary history information to a prospective employer; and
  3. Nothing in the bill shall be construed to allow prior salary, by itself, to justify any disparity in compensation.

AB 46

On September 12, 2017, AB 46 was ordered unanimously approved by a Senate Appropriations Committee and is pending before the legislature. The bill has not been amended since its introduction.

* * *

California already had strong fair pay laws. With the passage of these amendments, employers must be proactive in examining and fixing their pay practices to ensure compliance.

Please contact your Jackson Lewis attorney to discuss these developments and your specific organizational needs.

©2017 Jackson Lewis P.C. This Update is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice nor does it create an attorney/client relationship between Jackson Lewis and any readers or recipients. Readers should consult counsel of their own choosing to discuss how these matters relate to their individual circumstances. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without the express written consent of Jackson Lewis.

This Update may be considered attorney advertising in some states. Furthermore, prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Jackson Lewis P.C. represents management exclusively in workplace law and related litigation. Our attorneys are available to assist employers in their compliance efforts and to represent employers in matters before state and federal courts and administrative agencies. For more information, please contact the attorney(s) listed or the Jackson Lewis attorney with whom you regularly work.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

June 12, 2018

Nevada Supreme Court Rejects an Interpretation of ‘Health Insurance’ that Would Nullify State Wage System

June 12, 2018

In the last of a series of decisions reached by the Nevada Supreme Court interpreting the Minimum Wage Amendment (“MWA”) to the Nevada Constitution, the Court concluded that an employer may pay the lower of the state’s two-tier minimum wage “if the employer offers health insurance at a cost to the employer of the equivalent of at least... Read More

June 7, 2018

Number of Contingent Workers Inches Higher, DOL Survey Finds

June 7, 2018

The Department of Labor (DOL) has confirmed the gig economy is alive and well, but the number of workers has increased only slightly in the past decade. The DOL released its much-anticipated “Contingent and Alternative Employment Arrangements Survey” report on June 7, 2018. The number of U.S. workers classified as “contingent” (... Read More

May 31, 2018

Connecticut Bans Inquiries into Applicants’ Wage and Salary History

May 31, 2018

Connecticut is the latest state to prohibit employers from asking prospective employees about past compensation. Effective January 1, 2019, employers may not ask (directly or through a third party) about a prospective employee’s wage and salary history unless the prospective employee volunteers the information. According to Governor... Read More

Related Practices