Search form

California on Brink of Further Expansion of Fair Pay Protections

By Susan E. Groff and Benjamin A. Tulis
  • September 15, 2017

California’s legislature is close to passing three bills to expand the state’s fair pay laws. The bills, introduced in early 2017, were designed to expand upon, or clarify, the amended California Fair Pay Act (CFPA).

The bills include:

  • Assembly Bill (AB) 1209: To require employers with at least 500 employees in California to collect and submit information to the California Secretary of State regarding: (1) the difference between the median and mean salaries of male and female employees located in California who are exempt under the white collar exemptions; and (2) the difference between the median and mean wages of male and female board members who are located in California. The Secretary of State will publish this information on a publicly available website.
  • AB 168: To prohibit employers from seeking salary history from job applicants.
  • AB 46: To amend the CFPA to clarify that its provisions apply to both public and private employers.

While all three bills are moving toward adoption, AB 1209 is the closest.

AB 1209

As of September 11, 2017, an amended version of AB 1209 had passed both the Assembly and the Senate over the written objections of groups representing employers. AB 1209 has been amended as follows:

  • To provide that wage differentials between men and women are not presumed violations of the CFPA or limit an employer’s ability to demonstrate a basis for the wage differential.
  • To require employers to update and republish information biennially on July 1 (as opposed to annually, as provided in the original bill).
  • To provide that the collection of this information is limited to employees and board members located in California (there was no geographic limitation in the original bill).

Governor Jerry Brown has until October 15, 2017, to sign or veto the bill.

AB 168

AB 168 was passed by the Senate on September 12, 2017, and the Assembly is considering the bill.

The bill prohibits employers from seeking job applicants’ salary history. On September 8, 2017, the bill was amended to provide that:

  1. An employer may not rely upon the salary history information of an applicant (unless it is disclosed voluntarily and “without prompting”);
  2. Applicants may voluntarily “and without prompting” disclose salary history information to a prospective employer; and
  3. Nothing in the bill shall be construed to allow prior salary, by itself, to justify any disparity in compensation.

AB 46

On September 12, 2017, AB 46 was ordered unanimously approved by a Senate Appropriations Committee and is pending before the legislature. The bill has not been amended since its introduction.

* * *

California already had strong fair pay laws. With the passage of these amendments, employers must be proactive in examining and fixing their pay practices to ensure compliance.

Please contact your Jackson Lewis attorney to discuss these developments and your specific organizational needs.

©2017 Jackson Lewis P.C. This Update is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice nor does it create an attorney/client relationship between Jackson Lewis and any readers or recipients. Readers should consult counsel of their own choosing to discuss how these matters relate to their individual circumstances. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without the express written consent of Jackson Lewis.

This Update may be considered attorney advertising in some states. Furthermore, prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Jackson Lewis P.C. represents management exclusively in workplace law and related litigation. Our attorneys are available to assist employers in their compliance efforts and to represent employers in matters before state and federal courts and administrative agencies. For more information, please contact the attorney(s) listed or the Jackson Lewis attorney with whom you regularly work.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

February 7, 2018

Déjà Vu: Implications of a Government Shutdown on Federal Contractors

February 7, 2018

For the second time in a month, for lack of agreement on funding the government long-term, we face the specter of a government shutdown. The government shutdown that began on January 20, 2018, lasted three days. Congress ended that shutdown after voting on a stopgap measure to fund the government until February 8, 2018. As that date... Read More

January 29, 2018

Fitness Industry Workplace Law Update – Winter 2018

January 29, 2018

Welcome to our premiere issue! Our goal is to keep fitness industry clients and contacts informed about employment and labor law issues that may affect your organizations. We hope you find this newsletter valuable and invite you to share it with interested colleagues and contacts. In this issue, we provide a brief summary of hot... Read More

January 25, 2018

NYC Fast Food Deductions Law Stayed Pending Resolution of Constitutional Challenge by Restaurant Groups

January 25, 2018

Enforcement of the Fast Food Deductions provisions in New York City’s Fair Workweek Law has been stayed by a federal judge pending resolution of a constitutional challenge brought by two restaurant advocacy groups. The Fast Food Deductions Law requires fast food employers to deduct voluntary portions from workers’ paychecks and... Read More

Related Practices