Search form

California Meal Period Waivers Continue for Health Care Workers under New Law

  • October 12, 2015

Responding to a California Court of Appeal decision disallowing a wage order provision permitting a waiver of certain meal periods for employees in the health care industry as conflicting with state statute, California has enacted legislation confirming that health care employee meal period waiver provisions in existing state Industrial Welfare Commission wage orders have been valid and enforceable since October 1, 2000. The new law, SB 327, signed by Governor Jerry Brown on October 5, 2015, is effective immediately.

In Gerard v. Orange Coast Memorial Medical Center, 234 Cal. App. 4th 285 (2015), the California Court of Appeal concluded that certain language in Wage Order 5 of the Industrial Welfare Commission allowing employees in the health care industry to waive one of their two meal periods regardless of shift length was invalid to the extent it conflicts with Labor Code section 512. Labor Code section 512 prohibits waiver of the second meal period when an employee works more than 12 hours. Wage Orders 4 and 5, section 11(d), however, has allowed such waivers for employees in the healthcare industry since 1993. The Court of Appeal nevertheless concluded that its ruling should be applied retroactively, which opened health care industry employers to liability for up to four years of premium pay for “missed” meal periods. Currently, Gerard is under review by the California Supreme Court.

The new legislation retroactively confirms the validity of these greater-than-12-hour meal period waivers and amends section 516 of the Labor Code is to read, “the Industrial Welfare Commission may adopt or amend working condition orders with respect to break periods, meal periods, and days of rest for any workers in California consistent with the health and welfare of those workers.”

Jackson Lewis attorneys are available to answer inquiries regarding this development.

©2015 Jackson Lewis P.C. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Jackson Lewis and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Reproduction of this material in whole or in part is prohibited without the express prior written consent of Jackson Lewis P.C., a law firm that built its reputation on providing workplace law representation to management. Founded in 1958, the firm has grown to more than 900 attorneys in major cities nationwide serving clients across a wide range of practices and industries including government relations, healthcare and sports law. More information about Jackson Lewis can be found at

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

October 8, 2019

DOL Proposes FLSA Regulations to Close Door on ‘80/20’ Rule, Implement Tip Pooling Amendments

October 8, 2019

The Department of Labor (DOL) published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) on October 8, 2019, to eliminate the “20% Rule,” or “80/20 Rule,” under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The 20% Rule, which first appeared in a DOL Field Operations Handbook (FOH) in 1988, requires employers to pay tipped employees the full minimum... Read More

October 7, 2019

No California Waiting-Time, Inaccurate Wage Statement Penalties Based on Unpaid Meal Period Premiums, Court Rules

October 7, 2019

Do meal period premiums trigger derivative liability for waiting-time penalties and inaccurate wage statements? The California Court of Appeal has ruled in the negative on the oft-asked question. Naranjo et al. v. Spectrum Security Services, Inc., No. B256232 (Cal. Ct. App. Sept. 26, 2019). The Court ruled that actions to recover... Read More

October 7, 2019

Common Mistakes Companies Make with Gig Economy Workers

October 7, 2019

It is no secret that traditional employers often benefit from non-traditional workplace arrangements available in the gig economy, such as relief from paying unemployment insurance and worker’s compensation plans or being exempt from many minimum wage or overtime laws that apply to the traditional employer-employee relationship.... Read More

Related Practices