Search form

City of St. Louis Raises Minimum Wage, Imposes Notice Requirement

By Jessica L. Liss and Carrie L. Kinsella
  • October 14, 2015

Effective October 15, 2015, the minimum wage for employees working in St. Louis will increase to $8.25 per hour from the state minimum of $7.65 per hour pursuant to St. Louis City Ordinance 70078, which was passed on August 28, 2015.

The increased minimum wage for employees working within the geographic boundaries of the City has been challenged on grounds that it conflicts with state law. That case (No. 1522-CC10607) is pending before the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis and a decision is expected soon.

Under the ordinance, employers also must post a notice by October 15 advising employees of the current minimum wage (and subsequent increases in the minimum wage) as well as employees’ rights under the ordinance. Additionally, the first paycheck issued after October 15, 2015, must include a notice advising employees of the current minimum wage and the employees’ rights under the ordinance.

The ordinance also mandates further minimum wage increases, as follows:

  • $9.00 per hour effective January 1, 2016,
  • $10.00 per hour effective January 1, 2017, and
  • $11.00 per hour minimum wage effective January 1, 2018.

Penalties for non-compliance with the ordinance include a maximum fine of $500 per violation and a maximum sentence of 90 days in jail.

The ordinance also prohibits employers from interfering with, restraining, or denying the exercise of any rights bestowed by the ordinance. Accordingly, employers are prohibiting from terminating employment, reducing compensation, or taking other adverse employment action for an employee’s act of complaining to the Department of Human Services, the employer, a union, other employees, or legal counsel regarding an alleged violation of the ordinance or otherwise exercising, in good faith, the rights protected under the ordinance.

Employers should monitor the case before the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis. In the interim, employers must be prepared to comply with the pay and notice requirements of the ordinance.

For assistance or further information, please contact a Jackson Lewis attorney.

Related:

City of St. Louis Minimum Wage Ordinance Struck Down by Court

©2015 Jackson Lewis P.C. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Jackson Lewis and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Reproduction of this material in whole or in part is prohibited without the express prior written consent of Jackson Lewis P.C., a law firm with more than 900 attorneys in major cities nationwide serving clients across a wide range of practices and industries. Having built its reputation on providing premier workplace law representation to management, the firm has grown to include leading practices in the areas of government relations, healthcare and sports law. For more information, visit www.jacksonlewis.com.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

February 11, 2019

California’s Reporting Time Pay Applies to Telephone Calls to Confirm Scheduled Shifts

February 11, 2019

For more than 75 years, California’s Wage Order No. 7 has required employers to compensate employees with reporting time pay if employees are required to report for work and in fact show up, but are then provided less than an established minimum number of hours of work or are provided with no work at all. Instead of actually requiring... Read More

February 1, 2019

New York Legislative Update — 2019 Starts With a Roar

February 1, 2019

The New York State Legislature gaveled in for the 2019-2020 Legislative Session on January 9, 2019, with Democrats in control of all three chambers of New York State government for the first time since the 2008-2009 session. As expected, the Democrats are flexing their muscles and progressive legislation traditionally stalled in a... Read More

January 31, 2019

Indiana Supreme Court Rules Driver Not Employee of Business Connecting Drivers with Customers

January 31, 2019

A driver who delivers recreational vehicles or trucks under a company’s authority is an independent contractor, not an employee, for purposes of the Indiana Unemployment Compensation Act, the Indiana Supreme Court has ruled. Q.D.-A, Inc. v. Indiana Dep’t of Workforce Dev., No. 19S-EX-43 (Jan. 23, 2019). Resolving conflicting lower... Read More

Related Practices