Search form

Colorado Division of Labor Likely to Prohibit Forfeiture of Vacation Time

By Ryan P. Lessmann and Kristen M. Baylis
  • September 24, 2015

Colorado employers with “use-it-or-lose-it” vacation policies, or who cap the amount of vacation time that employees can carry over from year to year, or who do not pay out accrued vacation upon discharge, should review and, if necessary, revise their vacation policies in light of recent changes to the state’s vacation pay enforcement position.

As part of its implementation of the new Colorado Wage Protection Act, the Colorado Division of Labor has announced, informally, a new enforcement position with respect to vacation pay. The Division interprets Colorado law to require that once vacation pay has been earned, it cannot be “unearned.” The Division expressly prohibits any type of forfeiture clause in vacation agreements, including “use-it-or-lose-it” provisions.

Employers may cap vacation accrual, but once vacation time has been earned, it must be paid out upon separation from employment.

The Division’s new policy applies only to vacation pay earned on and after January 1, 2015. Additionally, the vacation pay rules do not apply to sick leave or to paid time off (PTO).

Background

The Division’s new policy is based on its interpretation of Colorado Revised Statutes (Section 8-4-101(14)(a)(III)), providing that wages include vacation pay “earned in accordance with the terms of any agreement.” The statute also states, “If an employer provides paid vacation for an employee, the employer shall pay upon separation from employment all vacation pay earned and determinable in accordance with the terms of any agreement between the employer and the employee.”

Some companies interpreted the statute to mean that payment of vacation pay upon separation of employment was not required in all cases. However, that interpretation now poses risks for employers in light of the Division’s newly announced position.

Implications

Colorado employers are not required to provide any sort of paid vacation benefit. But if they do, and vacation pay is earned by an employee, it cannot be unearned and cannot be forfeited. As indicated, though, this is solely the Division’s informal position in determining wage claims filed with it. [Indeed, since the original posting of this article on September 24, 2015, we have obtained information that the Division’s informal interpretation is itself likely to change, and we understand that the Division’s formal position is forthcoming.] Additionally, this interpretation has not been adopted by any Colorado court at this time.

Even under the Division’s new informal interpretation, employers can retain PTO use-it-or-lose-it policies and non-payment-on-discharge policies, provided they are drafted properly to exclude reference to vacation time.

All Colorado employers should review their vacation policies, procedures, and employment agreements and remove any provisions requiring forfeiture of earned vacation pay, among other things.

If you have questions about the new enforcement position or about other developments affecting employers, please contact the Jackson Lewis attorney with whom you regularly work.

©2015 Jackson Lewis P.C. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Jackson Lewis and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Reproduction of this material in whole or in part is prohibited without the express prior written consent of Jackson Lewis P.C., a law firm that built its reputation on providing workplace law representation to management. Founded in 1958, the firm has grown to more than 900 attorneys in major cities nationwide serving clients across a wide range of practices and industries including government relations, healthcare and sports law. More information about Jackson Lewis can be found at www.jacksonlewis.com.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

September 13, 2019

California Supreme Court Rejects Claim for Unpaid Wages under PAGA

September 13, 2019

Putting an end to employees’ backdoor attempts to recover unpaid wages in Private Attorneys General Act-only actions under California Labor Code Section 558, the California Supreme Court has ruled against allowing such claims. ZB, N.A., et al. v. Superior Court, No. S246711 (Sept. 12, 2019). This is surprising, as the Court provided... Read More

September 13, 2019

California Worker Misclassification Bill Closer to Enactment

September 13, 2019

The California Assembly has passed a bill that would require workers to be classified as employees if the employer exerts control over how the workers perform their tasks or if their work is part of the employer’s regular business. Assembly Bill 5 (AB 5) passed by a vote of 61-16 in the Assembly. Governor Gavin Newsom has stated his... Read More

September 9, 2019

Non-Agricultural Employers May Use Workweek Averaging to Satisfy State Minimum Wage Obligations in Washington

September 9, 2019

The Washington Supreme Court has confirmed that non-agricultural employers may use a workweek averaging methodology to satisfy the Washington Minimum Wage Act. Sampson et al. v. Knight Transportation Inc. et al., No. 96264-2 (Sept. 5, 2019). In other words, non-agricultural employers can satisfy their state minimum wage... Read More

Related Practices