Search form

EEOC to Publish Update to EEO-1 Pay Data Reporting Proposal

By Stephanie E. Lewis, K. Joy Chin, Laura A. Mitchell and Elizabeth P. Hernandez
  • July 13, 2016

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has released an update with revisions to its proposed EEO-1 pay data collection report. The proposal would have employers with at least 100 employees submitting to the EEOC all employees’ W-2 earnings data and actual hours worked beginning with the 2017 EEO-1 reporting cycle.

The revised proposal will be published in the July 14 Federal Register and the public will have 30 days to submit comments. This revision takes into consideration public comments received on the Agency’s initially proposed pay data collection tool.

Which Employers Would Be Covered?

The EEOC considered comments urging that smaller employers be exempt from the pay reporting requirement but has continued to make the proposed rule applicable to all employers with at least 100 employees.

When Will the Pay Disclosures Be Required?

The revision proposes to change the EEO-1 filing deadline to March 31st of every year (instead of the current September 30th deadline) and proposes to change the workforce snapshot reported to a pay period between October 1st and December 31st of the reporting year (instead of the current July through September time period).

This change would take effect for EEO-1 filings in 2018. Employers would be required to file the new pay data component along with the existing EEO-1 report by March 31, 2018, thereby giving employers a year-and-a-half to comply with the new requirements.

No EEO-1 reports would be filed in 2017. The reporting period for 2016, however, would remain unchanged — with reports being due by September 30, 2016.

What Data Will Be Reported?

The EEOC continues to propose to have employers report W-2 earnings as the “measure of pay” for the new pay data collection report. Employers will use Box 1 of the Form W-2 to complete their EEO-1 filings.

The EEOC also continues to propose that employers report “hours worked” as a component of the revised EEO-1 form, stating “collecting hours worked is of central importance” to assessing pay disparities. The EEOC proposes to adopt the Fair Labor Standards Act’s definition of “hours worked” for non-exempt employees.

The Commission provides two options for employers to report hours worked for exempt employees:

  1. a proxy of 40 hours a week for full-time exempt employees or 20 hours for part-time exempt employees; or
  2. actual hours worked if the employer already maintains accurate records of this information.

The EEOC acknowledges public comments received about the burden of pulling W-2 earnings and hours worked from two separate data collection systems, but explains that in not changing the proposed form, employers adjust their systems to make the information collection process easier.

How Will the Data Be Reported?

The proposed revision does not change the proposal to use pay bands to collect the W-2 income data. It does change, however, the time period for which the pay data will be reported. The revised proposal states that the pay data and hour worked will be reported for the entire calendar year, ending December 31.

How Will the Pay Data Be Used?

The revised proposal explains the collected pay data will be used in the following ways:

1. Early Assessment of Charges of Discrimination

2. EEOC Publication of Reports on Pay Disparities based on analysis of aggregation of collected pay data by:

  • race
  • sex
  • industry
  • occupational groupings
  • Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA)

3. EEOC Training on how pay data can “improve the agency’s enforcement work”

How Will the Confidentiality of Pay Data Be Protected?

The revised proposal goes into detail about how the agency will protect the confidentiality of the collected pay data, including the process for protection under FOIA and Title VII confidentiality provisions, as well as outlining internal protocols for protection of the data.

The publication also notes the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs will obtain the EEO-1 reports for federal contractors through the Joint Reporting Committee and explains OFCCP’s use of the FOIA process to notify contractors of requests for their EEO-1 pay data. EEOC states, “OFCCP will protect the confidentiality of EEO-1 pay and hours-worked data to the maximum extent possible consistent with FOIA.”


Jackson Lewis is preparing detailed comments in response to the EEOC’s revised proposed rule.

Jackson Lewis has a dedicated team of experts as part of its Pay Equity Resource Group that will continue to evaluate the Agency’s proposed update and provide additional insight and guidance.

©2016 Jackson Lewis P.C. This Update is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice nor does it create an attorney/client relationship between Jackson Lewis and any readers or recipients. Readers should consult counsel of their own choosing to discuss how these matters relate to their individual circumstances. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without the express written consent of Jackson Lewis.

This Update may be considered attorney advertising in some states. Furthermore, prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Jackson Lewis P.C. represents management exclusively in workplace law and related litigation. Our attorneys are available to assist employers in their compliance efforts and to represent employers in matters before state and federal courts and administrative agencies. For more information, please contact the attorney(s) listed or the Jackson Lewis attorney with whom you regularly work.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

November 30, 2018

Oregon Publishes Final Rule Implementing its Expansive Equal Pay Act, Effective January 1, 2019

November 30, 2018

A majority of the provisions of Oregon’s Equal Pay Act will go into effect on January 1, 2019. The Act’s ban on salary history inquiries went into effect in October 2017. Beginning 2019, the Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI) will enforce the Act, including the inquiry ban, and employees and applicants may file claims with BOLI.... Read More

November 30, 2018

Salary History Ban Arrives in New York’s Suffolk County

November 30, 2018

New York’s Suffolk County is the latest local jurisdiction to adopt legislation prohibiting employers from asking about the prior salary histories of prospective employees. The salary history ban amends the Suffolk County Human Rights Law, which defines an employer as persons or entities that employ at least four employees. The ban goes... Read More

May 31, 2018

Connecticut Bans Inquiries into Applicants’ Wage and Salary History

May 31, 2018

Connecticut is the latest state to prohibit employers from asking prospective employees about past compensation. Effective January 1, 2019, employers may not ask (directly or through a third party) about a prospective employee’s wage and salary history unless the prospective employee volunteers the information. According to Governor... Read More