Search form

Judge’s Ruling in Oil and Gas Worker’s Death Could Spark Change

  • September 9, 2015

A judge’s decision to award lifetime workers’ compensation benefits to the widow of a Colorado oil and gas worker who died from toxic gases after opening a tank to measure oil levels could reverberate throughout the industry.

Jim Freemyer, 59, died in July, 2014, after he inhaled a toxic mix of hydrocarbons in a low-oxygen atmosphere while he was gauging the level of oil in a tank at the Gaddis oil holding tank site near Johnstown, Colorado. The procedure, known as “tank gauging,” occurs when a worker ‒ usually a truck driver ‒ measures the amount of oil in a tank by dropping a device similar to a tape measure into the vessel until it hits bottom, retrieving the gauge by winding it up, and noting the measurement of the oil depth on the tape.

In July, a judge ruled that Freemyer’s widow was entitled to funeral expenses and a monthly death benefit. The employer, Now or Never Trucking, Inc., of Greeley, said it will not appeal the decision, Bloomberg BNA reported.

Besides paying expenses and benefits, the trucking firm also faces a $19,600 proposed penalty from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. In a letter to Freemyer’s widow in January, OSHA said it had determined Now or Never Trucking had not evaluated the respiratory hazard present during tank gauging, and alleged the victim had been working in an oxygen deficient atmosphere above or adjacent to an open thief hatch. In addition, OSHA said the company had not implemented engineering controls to eliminate or limit exposure to oxygen deficient atmospheres, or provided training to employees so they could recognize the hazard and employ work practices and personal protective equipment to guard against it.

The company’s insurer, Pinnacol Assurance, initially denied the benefits, claiming Freemyer’s poor health, not his workplace exposure, led to his death. However, the judge was persuaded by the testimony of a doctor who concluded Freemyer’s pre-existing cardiovascular disease resulted in his not being able to survive the toxic environment at the tank. Without the exposure, Freemyer would not have died when he did, the judge concluded. The judge also noted that instructions for the filter respirator Freemyer was wearing indicated that it was not designed for low-oxygen environments.

Pinnacol, which also provides coverage for other Colorado employers, told Bloomberg BNA it wanted to do whatever it could to minimize the potential for such accidents in the future. Spokeswoman Edie Sonn said, “We have seen media coverage of other similar tragic incidents and want to be sure that our policyholders are aware of the safety resources available to them to address the issue of toxic fumes in gas gauging.”

Sonn said that, besides developing materials internally, Pinnacol is sharing resources from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, which earlier this year called attention to nine production workers who died during tank gauging work over a five-year period ending in 2014. Freemyer was one of those workers. The deaths promoted the OSHA National STEPS Alliance, a public-private partnership that includes OSHA and NIOSH, to issue a tank hazard alert this spring. That alert was featured in our newsletter.

Representatives of oil and gas producers Encana Corp. and Anadarko Petroleum Corp. told Bloomberg BNA they are evaluating alternatives to manual gauging for measuring oil levels in tanks, such as remote gauging and other automated control technologies. Besides remote gauging and automated gauging, sight gauges, closed loop systems, and remote venting are other engineering controls the OSHA National STEPS Alliance recommends.

©2015 Jackson Lewis P.C. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Jackson Lewis and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Reproduction of this material in whole or in part is prohibited without the express prior written consent of Jackson Lewis P.C., a law firm with more than 900 attorneys in major cities nationwide serving clients across a wide range of practices and industries. Having built its reputation on providing premier workplace law representation to management, the firm has grown to include leading practices in the areas of government relations, healthcare and sports law. For more information, visit www.jacksonlewis.com.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

January 23, 2019

U.S. House Committee to Focus on Workforce Protections

January 23, 2019

Signaling a renewed emphasis on workforce protections at the opening of the 116th Congress, the U.S. House of Representatives has changed the name of its committee with jurisdiction over labor matters back to the Committee on Education and Labor. It was called the Committee on Education and the Workforce when Republicans held the... Read More

January 7, 2019

2019: The Year Ahead for Employers

January 7, 2019

Over the past year, state and local governments responded in a variety of ways to national policy, and the midterm elections painted a picture of what’s in store for employers in 2019 and beyond. Jackson Lewis’ annual report outlines upcoming issues, trends, legislation and regulations employers need to be aware of in the coming year... Read More

January 2, 2019

Retail Industry Workplace Law Update – Winter 2019

January 2, 2019

Class Action Trends Report The latest issue of our quarterly report on developments in class action litigation focuses on “joint employers” and covers the following topics: Are you my employer? A patchwork of tests Only in California Prevention pointer Read the Report … OSHA: Certain Safety Incentive Programs, Post... Read More

Related Practices