Search form

Labor Board Subpoenas Allowed before OSHA Consultation

  • February 16, 2016

A divided National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has ruled that a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between NLRB and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration over OSHA-related issues does not require NLRB’s General Counsel to consult with OSHA before issuing investigative subpoenas.

Representatives of a manufacturing facility in Alabama had petitioned NLRB either to issue protective orders or to revoke subpoenas issued by an NLRB regional director, acting on behalf of the agency’s General Counsel, for documents or other items related to two alleged unfair labor practices. The company contended that a 1975 NLRB-OSHA MOU required NLRB to defer action until the agency first conferred with OSHA when the complaints relate to matters associated with OSHA’s governing statute (Section 11(c)).

Both OSHA and NLRB have mandates to address employee safety concerns. Section 11(c) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act prohibits firing or discriminating against an employee for exercising rights under the OSH Act. The National Labor Relations Act prohibits retaliation against employees who have engaged in union activity or protected concerted activities related to employees’ safety concerns. The purpose of the MOU is to prevent duplicative litigation before the two agencies when complaints involve similar safety issues.

In denying the petition, Board members Kent Y. Hirozawa and Lauren McFerran acknowledged that the MOU calls for deferral or dismissal where a charge filed with the General Counsel and a complaint brought to OSHA both involve Section 11(c) issues. But, they added, “[W]e find that the MOU does not require the Region to determine whether to defer or dismiss such charges, or engage in consultations with the Solicitor of Labor concerning deferral or dismissal, without having investigated the facts and circumstances surrounding the allegations.”

The Board’s decision indicates that an employer cannot block an NLRB investigation of an alleged unfair labor practice even if the employer correctly surmises the agency will defer action in a dispute to OSHA.

Employers should consult with counsel to determine whether and how their particular controversies may be affected by this decision.

©2016 Jackson Lewis P.C. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Jackson Lewis and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Reproduction of this material in whole or in part is prohibited without the express prior written consent of Jackson Lewis P.C., a law firm with more than 900 attorneys in major cities nationwide serving clients across a wide range of practices and industries. Having built its reputation on providing premier workplace law representation to management, the firm has grown to include leading practices in the areas of government relations, healthcare and sports law. For more information, visit www.jacksonlewis.com.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

March 19, 2019

Scabby the Rat: Threatening Pest or Famous Labor Icon?

March 19, 2019

Employers have at least one way to rid themselves of Scabby the Rat, a staple of labor union protest, following a decision from a federal appeals court upholding an ordinance enacted by the Town of Grand Chute, Wisconsin, banning anything placed on a public right-of-way that might obstruct vision or distract passing drivers. Construction... Read More

March 11, 2019

Top Five Labor Law Developments for February 2019

March 11, 2019

National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) Member Mark Gaston Pearce has withdrawn his name from consideration for another term on the Board. Pearce reportedly explained his decision by stating it felt best to “remove myself from the center of a political tug of war.” Pearce’s nomination had stalled in the U.S. Senate, which ended its last... Read More

February 15, 2019

Labor Board Returns to Pre-2014 Test for Determining if Individual Is an Independent Contractor

February 15, 2019

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has held that in deciding whether an individual is an independent contractor or an employee, it will return to focusing on the extent to which the arrangement between the ostensible employer and the alleged employee provided an “entrepreneurial opportunity” to the individual, overruling a 2014... Read More