Search form

Labor Department Proposes Reversing Obama-Era ‘Tip-Pooling’ Rule

By Jeffrey W. Brecher and Eric R. Magnus
  • December 6, 2017

Employers would be expressly permitted to require servers and other tip-earning employees to share their tips with employees working in the kitchen and other “back of the house” employee, but only when the employer does not use the tip credit and state law would not otherwise prohibit the practice, under proposed regulations published by the Department of Labor (DOL). This is a reversal of the current DOL regulations, which would be rescinded.

Generally, under the Fair Labor Standards Act, employers may pay tipped employees a cash wage of as little as $2.13 per hour, as long as workers make up the difference between the cash wage and the federal minimum wage ($7.25 per hour) in tips. Employers may take this tip credit only if all of the tips are retained by the employee receiving the tips, unless there is a valid pool that is limited to tipped workers, defined as those who customarily receive more than $30.00 a month in gratuities.

Under the current rule, promulgated during the Obama Administration in 2011, employers are prohibited from requiring tipped workers to pool their gratuities with non-tipped workers, regardless of whether the employer takes a tip credit. This rule repeatedly has been challenged in court, most notably in Oregon Restaurant & Lodging Ass’n v. Perez, 816 F.3d 1080 (9th Cir. 2016), petition for cert. filed (Jan. 19, 2017). In that case, a highly divided U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the rule. By contrast, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit held that the rule is invalid in Marlow v. New Food Guy, Inc., 861 F.3d 1157 (10th Cir. 2017). The DOL may argue the proposed rule moots the petition for certiorari pending in Oregon Restaurant.

Many employers who do not take a tip credit will like this proposed regulation. It would allow those employees working in the back of the house, who typically receive no tips at all, to share in sometimes lucrative tips (particularly in high-end restaurants) received by servers. This rule reversal, however, (1) applies only to employers who do not take the tip credit (i.e., pay tipped employees an hourly wage greater than the applicable minimum wage), and (2) would not be of any use in states, such as California and New York, where state law otherwise prohibits such tip-pooling practices.

Pursuant to its Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, the DOL has provided a 30-day comment period, until January 4, 2018, on the new rule.

Please contact Jackson Lewis with any questions about the proposed rule or other compliance issues with tip-pooling and tip credit laws.

©2017 Jackson Lewis P.C. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Jackson Lewis and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Reproduction of this material in whole or in part is prohibited without the express prior written consent of Jackson Lewis P.C., a law firm that built its reputation on providing workplace law representation to management. Founded in 1958, the firm has grown to more than 900 attorneys in major cities nationwide serving clients across a wide range of practices and industries including government relations, healthcare and sports law. More information about Jackson Lewis can be found at www.jacksonlewis.com.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

September 13, 2019

California Supreme Court Rejects Claim for Unpaid Wages under PAGA

September 13, 2019

Putting an end to employees’ backdoor attempts to recover unpaid wages in Private Attorneys General Act-only actions under California Labor Code Section 558, the California Supreme Court has ruled against allowing such claims. ZB, N.A., et al. v. Superior Court, No. S246711 (Sept. 12, 2019). This is surprising, as the Court provided... Read More

September 13, 2019

California Worker Misclassification Bill Closer to Enactment

September 13, 2019

The California Assembly has passed a bill that would require workers to be classified as employees if the employer exerts control over how the workers perform their tasks or if their work is part of the employer’s regular business. Assembly Bill 5 (AB 5) passed by a vote of 61-16 in the Assembly. Governor Gavin Newsom has stated his... Read More

September 9, 2019

Non-Agricultural Employers May Use Workweek Averaging to Satisfy State Minimum Wage Obligations in Washington

September 9, 2019

The Washington Supreme Court has confirmed that non-agricultural employers may use a workweek averaging methodology to satisfy the Washington Minimum Wage Act. Sampson et al. v. Knight Transportation Inc. et al., No. 96264-2 (Sept. 5, 2019). In other words, non-agricultural employers can satisfy their state minimum wage... Read More

Related Practices