Search form

Labor Department Proposes Reversing Obama-Era ‘Tip-Pooling’ Rule

By Jeffrey W. Brecher and Eric R. Magnus
  • December 6, 2017

Employers would be expressly permitted to require servers and other tip-earning employees to share their tips with employees working in the kitchen and other “back of the house” employee, but only when the employer does not use the tip credit and state law would not otherwise prohibit the practice, under proposed regulations published by the Department of Labor (DOL). This is a reversal of the current DOL regulations, which would be rescinded.

Generally, under the Fair Labor Standards Act, employers may pay tipped employees a cash wage of as little as $2.13 per hour, as long as workers make up the difference between the cash wage and the federal minimum wage ($7.25 per hour) in tips. Employers may take this tip credit only if all of the tips are retained by the employee receiving the tips, unless there is a valid pool that is limited to tipped workers, defined as those who customarily receive more than $30.00 a month in gratuities.

Under the current rule, promulgated during the Obama Administration in 2011, employers are prohibited from requiring tipped workers to pool their gratuities with non-tipped workers, regardless of whether the employer takes a tip credit. This rule repeatedly has been challenged in court, most notably in Oregon Restaurant & Lodging Ass’n v. Perez, 816 F.3d 1080 (9th Cir. 2016), petition for cert. filed (Jan. 19, 2017). In that case, a highly divided U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the rule. By contrast, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit held that the rule is invalid in Marlow v. New Food Guy, Inc., 861 F.3d 1157 (10th Cir. 2017). The DOL may argue the proposed rule moots the petition for certiorari pending in Oregon Restaurant.

Many employers who do not take a tip credit will like this proposed regulation. It would allow those employees working in the back of the house, who typically receive no tips at all, to share in sometimes lucrative tips (particularly in high-end restaurants) received by servers. This rule reversal, however, (1) applies only to employers who do not take the tip credit (i.e., pay tipped employees an hourly wage greater than the applicable minimum wage), and (2) would not be of any use in states, such as California and New York, where state law otherwise prohibits such tip-pooling practices.

Pursuant to its Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, the DOL has provided a 30-day comment period, until January 4, 2018, on the new rule.

Please contact Jackson Lewis with any questions about the proposed rule or other compliance issues with tip-pooling and tip credit laws.

©2017 Jackson Lewis P.C. This Update is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice nor does it create an attorney/client relationship between Jackson Lewis and any readers or recipients. Readers should consult counsel of their own choosing to discuss how these matters relate to their individual circumstances. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without the express written consent of Jackson Lewis.

This Update may be considered attorney advertising in some states. Furthermore, prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Jackson Lewis P.C. represents management exclusively in workplace law and related litigation. Our attorneys are available to assist employers in their compliance efforts and to represent employers in matters before state and federal courts and administrative agencies. For more information, please contact the attorney(s) listed or the Jackson Lewis attorney with whom you regularly work.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

March 9, 2018

Calculating Overtime Value of Flat-Sum Bonus Must Be Based on Actual Non-Overtime Hours Worked, California High Court Holds

March 9, 2018

The California Supreme Court has held that, under state law, when an employee earns a flat sum bonus during a pay period, the overtime pay rate will be calculated using the actual number of non-overtime hours worked by the employee during the pay period. Alvarado v. Dart Container Corp., 2018 Cal. LEXIS 1123 (Cal. Mar. 5, 2018). In so... Read More

March 8, 2018

Colorado Law Claims for Unpaid Wages Limited to Two or Three Years Prior to Termination

March 8, 2018

Under the Colorado Wage Claim Act (CWCA), a terminated employee’s right to seek unpaid wages or compensation at termination is subject to the two- or three-year statute of limitations found in the CWCA, the Colorado Supreme Court has held. Hernandez v. Domenico Farms, Inc., 2018 CO 15 (Mar. 5, 2018). The Court also clarified that the... Read More

March 5, 2018

Massachusetts AG’s Office Issues Guidance on Equal Pay Law Set to Take Effect in July

March 5, 2018

On March 1, 2018, the Massachusetts Office of the Attorney General issued its much-anticipated guidance on the state’s new pay equity law, set to take effect on July 1, 2018. The Massachusetts pay equity legislation amended the state’s Massachusetts Equal Pay Act (MEPA). Among other things, the amendment changed the definition of... Read More

Related Practices