Search form

Long-Term Care Facilities: New Rule Imposes Significant Changes, including Bar on Pre-Dispute Arbitration Agreements

By James A. Shannon
  • October 5, 2016

Skilled nursing facilities participating in the Medicare program and nursing facilities in the Medicaid program are prohibited from including a mandatory pre-dispute arbitration clause in their contracts with individuals seeking admission to long-term care (LTC) facilities under a final rule from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). This prohibition and other significant new or amended regulatory changes will go into effect on November 28, 2016, a mere 55 days after publication in the Federal Register.

The 713-page final rule, the result of the first comprehensive review of the regulations governing LTC facilities since 1991 (42 C.F.R. Part 483, Subpart B), obligates many other important changes to the operations of LTC facilities, from initial care planning to resident discharges. While the bulk of the new and amended requirements are effective on November 28, some requirements, due to their complexity, will be phased-in, to be fully implemented one-to-three years after the effective date.

CMS received more than 9,800 public comments to the proposed rule published on July 16, 2015. Almost 1,000 comments addressed the most controversial topic: the use of mandatory pre-dispute arbitration agreements with individuals seeking admission to LTC facilities. While the use of such arbitration agreements is well-established in some states (e.g., Florida, Kentucky, and North Carolina), LTC facilities in other states only recently began to make use of them. For example, a New York appellate court first held in 2015 that an arbitration agreement (authored by the attorneys now forming the Jackson Lewis Health Law and Transactions Practice) was enforceable notwithstanding a New York statute (Public Health Law § 2801-d) purporting to invalidate waivers of the right to institute a court proceeding or to a jury trial.

Proposed Rule

The proposed rule would have implemented certain safeguards to the use of pre-dispute arbitration agreements, rather than precluding them altogether. However, after review of the public comments and available literature, CMS ultimately decided it was “convinced that requiring residents to sign pre-dispute arbitration agreements is fundamentally unfair because, among other things, it is almost impossible for residents or their decision-makers to give fully informed and voluntary consent to arbitration before a dispute has arisen.”


Some of the finer points regarding the impact of the final rule on arbitration in the context of LTC facilities include:

  • The final rule does not invalidate existing pre-dispute arbitration agreements entered into before the effective date. These will be “grandfathered” and stay in effect.
  • The final rule does not prohibit post-dispute arbitration agreements, although they will be subject to safeguards similar to those set forth in the proposed rule.
  • The prohibition against the use of pre-dispute arbitration agreements is fashioned as a requirement for participation in Medicare and Medicaid. Therefore, it has no effect on a LTC facility, if one exists, that does not participate in such programs.
  • CMS is requiring LTC facilities that resolve a dispute with a resident through arbitration to maintain a copy of the signed arbitration agreement and the arbitrator’s final decision for five years and that they be available for inspection by surveyors.

While a legal challenge to CMS’ authority to promulgate the prohibition against pre-dispute arbitration appears likely, unless an injunction is granted delaying the final rule’s implementation, LTC facilities should plan now to cease using pre-dispute arbitration agreements and comply with the other new and amended requirements before November 28.

Please contact Jackson Lewis for additional insight and guidance on complying with the final rule.

©2016 Jackson Lewis P.C. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Jackson Lewis and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Reproduction of this material in whole or in part is prohibited without the express prior written consent of Jackson Lewis P.C., a law firm that built its reputation on providing workplace law representation to management. Founded in 1958, the firm has grown to more than 900 attorneys in major cities nationwide serving clients across a wide range of practices and industries including government relations, healthcare and sports law. More information about Jackson Lewis can be found at

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

November 13, 2019

Healthcare Employers’ Title VII Obligations in Harassment, Discrimination of Employees by Patients

November 13, 2019

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act requires healthcare employers to protect their medical staff and employees from harassment and discrimination and respond to any such behaviors swiftly and effectively, even if the actor is a patient, rather than a coworker or supervisor. A decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit... Read More

November 11, 2019

Two Federal Courts Strike Down Health and Human Services ‘Conscience Protection Rule’

November 11, 2019

Two federal courts have struck down the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) “Conscience Protection Rule,” which was slated to go into effect on November 22, 2019. The Rule purported to enforce pre-existing “conscience laws” that protect the rights of certain employees of healthcare institutions that receive federal... Read More

August 1, 2019

Healthcare Organizations, Is Your Patient Portal Secure?

August 1, 2019

Healthcare organizations’ traditional cybersecurity measures are insufficient against today’s cyberattacks, according to a report from LexisNexis® Risk Solutions and the Information Security Media Group released in July 2019. Even as healthcare organizations embrace new technologies (such as patient portals), the report shows that... Read More

Related Practices