Search form

Mine Agency Focuses Attention on Workplace Exams, Diesel Exhaust Exposure

  • June 20, 2016

The Mine Safety and Health Administration has rolled out two initiatives: a proposed rule increasing requirements for workplace examinations that, MSHA says, is aimed at curbing injuries, illnesses, and fatalities among Metal/Non-Metal (M/NM) miners, and a Request For Information (RFI) on approaches to reduce the potential for adverse health effects from exposure to diesel exhaust in miners who work underground.

Under the M/NM initiative, MSHA proposes to change identical standards regarding workplace examinations under 30 CFR Part 56/57.18002. At present, a competent person must conduct a workplace examination to look for adverse safety and health conditions at least once per shift. Corrective action must be initiated promptly and a record kept of the examination. Under MSHA regulations, a competent person is anyone having abilities and experience qualifying that person to perform an assigned duty.

“The existing standards do not address the contents of the examination record, do not require mine operators to promptly notify miners when adverse conditions are found, and do not require operators to make the examination records available to miners’ representatives,” MSHA said in a press release.

The proposal would amend the standards to specify that the examination be performed by a competent person before the shift begins. It also would require this individual to prepare a record of the examination before the shift ends, and then sign and date the form. The record must include where the examination was conducted and a description of each condition that may adversely affect miners’ safety and health. The operator must inform miners promptly of any adverse conditions in their area and undertake corrective action without undue delay. The record also must identify any corrective actions taken and the date they were taken, along with the identity of the person taking the corrective action and the date the record of corrective action was prepared. Finally, the operator would be required to make the examination records available to miners’ representatives.

MSHA noted that 122 M/NM miners died over a nearly six-year period ending in mid-December 2015. “We believe that many of these fatalities could have been prevented with better working place examinations,” MSHA chief Joe Main said. However, in a likely sign of opposition to come, one industry stakeholder has questioned Main’s rationale. “We have seen in recent years that safety improvements focused on improving behaviors of workers are more effective at reducing injuries than ones focused on workplace conditions,” remarked Pam Whitted, senior vice president of government and regulatory affairs at the National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association.

MSHA also has scheduled four public hearings on the examination rule proposal to be held in July and August.

As for the RFI, MSHA said it is in response to recently completed scientific studies that purportedly establish “a strong link” between diesel exhaust exposure and lung cancer in miners, state regulatory initiatives, stakeholder requests to re-evaluate diesel exposures, and MSHA data showing reduced exposures resulting from MSHA’s regulations issued in the last two decades. “It is time for MSHA to conduct a review and determine if these standards adequately protect miners’ health,” MSHA said. Stakeholders are requested to share their knowledge and experience on approaches to control and monitor underground miners’ exposure to diesel exhaust, including diesel particulate matter.

Comments may be submitted electronically to http://www.regulations.gov no later than September 6, 2016. Jackson Lewis safety and health attorneys can assist you in preparing comments or oral testimony in response to these important initiatives.

©2016 Jackson Lewis P.C. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Jackson Lewis and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Reproduction of this material in whole or in part is prohibited without the express prior written consent of Jackson Lewis P.C., a law firm with more than 900 attorneys in major cities nationwide serving clients across a wide range of practices and industries. Having built its reputation on providing premier workplace law representation to management, the firm has grown to include leading practices in the areas of government relations, healthcare and sports law. For more information, visit www.jacksonlewis.com.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

January 23, 2019

U.S. House Committee to Focus on Workforce Protections

January 23, 2019

Signaling a renewed emphasis on workforce protections at the opening of the 116th Congress, the U.S. House of Representatives has changed the name of its committee with jurisdiction over labor matters back to the Committee on Education and Labor. It was called the Committee on Education and the Workforce when Republicans held the... Read More

January 7, 2019

2019: The Year Ahead for Employers

January 7, 2019

Over the past year, state and local governments responded in a variety of ways to national policy, and the midterm elections painted a picture of what’s in store for employers in 2019 and beyond. Jackson Lewis’ annual report outlines upcoming issues, trends, legislation and regulations employers need to be aware of in the coming year... Read More

January 2, 2019

Retail Industry Workplace Law Update – Winter 2019

January 2, 2019

Class Action Trends Report The latest issue of our quarterly report on developments in class action litigation focuses on “joint employers” and covers the following topics: Are you my employer? A patchwork of tests Only in California Prevention pointer Read the Report … OSHA: Certain Safety Incentive Programs, Post... Read More

Related Practices