Search form

Mine Agency Focuses Attention on Workplace Exams, Diesel Exhaust Exposure

  • June 20, 2016

The Mine Safety and Health Administration has rolled out two initiatives: a proposed rule increasing requirements for workplace examinations that, MSHA says, is aimed at curbing injuries, illnesses, and fatalities among Metal/Non-Metal (M/NM) miners, and a Request For Information (RFI) on approaches to reduce the potential for adverse health effects from exposure to diesel exhaust in miners who work underground.

Under the M/NM initiative, MSHA proposes to change identical standards regarding workplace examinations under 30 CFR Part 56/57.18002. At present, a competent person must conduct a workplace examination to look for adverse safety and health conditions at least once per shift. Corrective action must be initiated promptly and a record kept of the examination. Under MSHA regulations, a competent person is anyone having abilities and experience qualifying that person to perform an assigned duty.

“The existing standards do not address the contents of the examination record, do not require mine operators to promptly notify miners when adverse conditions are found, and do not require operators to make the examination records available to miners’ representatives,” MSHA said in a press release.

The proposal would amend the standards to specify that the examination be performed by a competent person before the shift begins. It also would require this individual to prepare a record of the examination before the shift ends, and then sign and date the form. The record must include where the examination was conducted and a description of each condition that may adversely affect miners’ safety and health. The operator must inform miners promptly of any adverse conditions in their area and undertake corrective action without undue delay. The record also must identify any corrective actions taken and the date they were taken, along with the identity of the person taking the corrective action and the date the record of corrective action was prepared. Finally, the operator would be required to make the examination records available to miners’ representatives.

MSHA noted that 122 M/NM miners died over a nearly six-year period ending in mid-December 2015. “We believe that many of these fatalities could have been prevented with better working place examinations,” MSHA chief Joe Main said. However, in a likely sign of opposition to come, one industry stakeholder has questioned Main’s rationale. “We have seen in recent years that safety improvements focused on improving behaviors of workers are more effective at reducing injuries than ones focused on workplace conditions,” remarked Pam Whitted, senior vice president of government and regulatory affairs at the National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association.

MSHA also has scheduled four public hearings on the examination rule proposal to be held in July and August.

As for the RFI, MSHA said it is in response to recently completed scientific studies that purportedly establish “a strong link” between diesel exhaust exposure and lung cancer in miners, state regulatory initiatives, stakeholder requests to re-evaluate diesel exposures, and MSHA data showing reduced exposures resulting from MSHA’s regulations issued in the last two decades. “It is time for MSHA to conduct a review and determine if these standards adequately protect miners’ health,” MSHA said. Stakeholders are requested to share their knowledge and experience on approaches to control and monitor underground miners’ exposure to diesel exhaust, including diesel particulate matter.

Comments may be submitted electronically to no later than September 6, 2016. Jackson Lewis safety and health attorneys can assist you in preparing comments or oral testimony in response to these important initiatives.

©2016 Jackson Lewis P.C. This Update is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice nor does it create an attorney/client relationship between Jackson Lewis and any readers or recipients. Readers should consult counsel of their own choosing to discuss how these matters relate to their individual circumstances. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without the express written consent of Jackson Lewis.

This Update may be considered attorney advertising in some states. Furthermore, prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Jackson Lewis P.C. represents management exclusively in workplace law and related litigation. Our attorneys are available to assist employers in their compliance efforts and to represent employers in matters before state and federal courts and administrative agencies. For more information, please contact the attorney(s) listed or the Jackson Lewis attorney with whom you regularly work.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

February 21, 2018

Maine Recreational Marijuana Law Limits Drug Testing, Disciplinary Consequences Imposed by Employers

February 21, 2018

A provision of Maine’s recreational marijuana law prohibits employers from taking adverse employment actions for off-premises marijuana use, as of February 1, 2018. This law effectively prevents Maine employers from testing for marijuana for pre-employment purposes. The law also affects employers who employ employees subject to federal... Read More

January 29, 2018

Fitness Industry Workplace Law Update – Winter 2018

January 29, 2018

Welcome to our premiere issue! Our goal is to keep fitness industry clients and contacts informed about employment and labor law issues that may affect your organizations. We hope you find this newsletter valuable and invite you to share it with interested colleagues and contacts. In this issue, we provide a brief summary of hot... Read More

January 24, 2018

2018: The Year Ahead for Employers

January 24, 2018

An executive summary of recent changes in workplace law and a look ahead to 2018. Read More

Related Practices