Search form

Mine Safety Agency Enhances Enforcement of ‘Rules to Live By’ to Prevent Mining Fatalities

  • July 18, 2017

The Mine Safety and Health Administration said it has begun “enhanced” enforcement of its “Rules to Live By” initiative, regulating standards commonly linked to mine deaths, as well as nine underground coal mine exam standards, targeting the greatest risks to miners in underground coal mines.

The agency announced in 2016 that these heightened measures would begin July 1, 2017.

Started in 2010, “Rules to Live By” includes 29 coal mine standards and 20 metal and nonmetal mine standards the agency identified as critical to reducing fatalities in the mining industry. The nine underground coal mine exam standards, published in 2012, address ventilation, methane, roof control, combustible materials, rock dust, equipment guarding and other safeguards. MSHA said these are “consistent with the standards emphasized in MSHA’s ‘Rules to Live By’ initiative and the types of violations cited in MSHA’s accident investigation report on the [2010] Upper Big Branch Mine explosion as contributing to the cause of that deadly accident.” The explosion in Raleigh County, West Virginia, killed 29 miners.

“While we’ve seen progress in reducing mining deaths associated with both Rules to Live By and the exam rule,” Joseph A. Main, Assistant Secretary of Labor for Mine Safety and Health, said, “mine operators need to conduct better site inspections and take appropriate action to improve compliance with these standards. That is why we are increasing attention on these critical standards. We urge the mining industry to do the same.”

Beginning July 1, 2017, MSHA said it will increasingly use its web-based “ Rules to Live By Calculator” to identify the number of citations and orders issued during the most recent completed inspection periods for which data are available. Inspectors will give mine operators a copy of the results, “encouraging them to use the tools to monitor their own compliance and take action to eliminate violations.” MSHA said, “The results will be added to criteria for consideration of impact inspections, particularly targeting mines with elevated noncompliance of these standards.”

The agency’s analysis of hundreds of U.S. mining fatalities over a 10-year period revealed that fatalities associated with “Rules to Live By” standards have decreased an average of 23 percent. Further, “significant and substantial” citations and orders issued for violations of these standards have declined an average of 37 percent.

Fatalities associated with the exam rule have decreased an average of 22 percent, according to MSHA, and “significant and substantial,” or S&S, citations and orders issued for violations of this standard have declined an average of 45 percent.
 
The “Rules to Live By” program includes the following:

  • Rules to Live By I: Fatality Prevention – Launched in February 2010, focuses on 24 frequently cited standards (11 in coal mining and 13 in metal and nonmetal mining) that cause or contribute to fatal accidents in the mining industry in nine accident categories.
  • Rules to Live By II: Preventing Catastrophic Accidents – Begun in November 2010, focuses on standards MSHA cited during major disasters that contributed to five or more fatalities over the last 10 years.
  • Rules to Live By III: Preventing Common Mining Deaths – Started in January 2012, focuses on 14 safety standards (eight in coal mining and six in metal and nonmetal mining) cited in at least five mining accidents and resulting in at least five deaths during the 10-year period from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2010.
  • Rules to Live By IV: Preventing Common Mining Deaths – Announced in May 2016, focuses on two safety standards (one in coal mining and one in metal and nonmetal mining) cited as a result of at least five mining accidents and resulting in at least five fatalities during the 10-year period from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2015.

Jackson Lewis attorneys are available to help clients navigate federal regulations for safety and health compliance.

©2017 Jackson Lewis P.C. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Jackson Lewis and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Reproduction of this material in whole or in part is prohibited without the express prior written consent of Jackson Lewis P.C., a law firm with more than 900 attorneys in major cities nationwide serving clients across a wide range of practices and industries. Having built its reputation on providing premier workplace law representation to management, the firm has grown to include leading practices in the areas of government relations, healthcare and sports law. For more information, visit www.jacksonlewis.com.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

January 23, 2019

U.S. House Committee to Focus on Workforce Protections

January 23, 2019

Signaling a renewed emphasis on workforce protections at the opening of the 116th Congress, the U.S. House of Representatives has changed the name of its committee with jurisdiction over labor matters back to the Committee on Education and Labor. It was called the Committee on Education and the Workforce when Republicans held the... Read More

January 7, 2019

2019: The Year Ahead for Employers

January 7, 2019

Over the past year, state and local governments responded in a variety of ways to national policy, and the midterm elections painted a picture of what’s in store for employers in 2019 and beyond. Jackson Lewis’ annual report outlines upcoming issues, trends, legislation and regulations employers need to be aware of in the coming year... Read More

January 2, 2019

Retail Industry Workplace Law Update – Winter 2019

January 2, 2019

Class Action Trends Report The latest issue of our quarterly report on developments in class action litigation focuses on “joint employers” and covers the following topics: Are you my employer? A patchwork of tests Only in California Prevention pointer Read the Report … OSHA: Certain Safety Incentive Programs, Post... Read More

Related Practices