Search form

New Puerto Rico Labor Department Religious Accommodation Regulations Effective May 25

By Maralyssa Álvarez-Sánchez and Sara E. Colón-Acevedo
  • May 23, 2017

The Employment Law Reform enacted earlier this year in Puerto Rico introduced a local requirement to accommodate an employee’s observance of religious practices or beliefs. (See our article, Top 20 Things You Should Know About the Proposed Puerto Rico Employment Law Reform.) The law directed the Secretary of the Puerto Rico Department of Labor to draft regulations for compliance with these provisions. These final regulations were recently published and are effective on May 25, 2017.

“Excessive Difficulty” Exception

Puerto Rico law now requires an employer to reasonably accommodate an employee’s religious practice or belief, unless it presents an “excessive difficulty” for the employer. This standard is not necessarily the same as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act’s “undue burden” exception for accommodation of religious beliefs or practices.

Under the local regulations, “excessive difficulty” requires the employer to prove that a given accommodation would involve major costs, create dangerous conditions, or impede the employee from being able to execute functions for which the employee was hired. It is the employer’s burden to establish that a denied accommodation is unreasonable, and the assumption that other employees with the same religious beliefs may need the same accommodation is not “excessive difficulty.”

Procedure for Requesting Accommodation

A request for religious accommodation must be in writing and contain a description of the religious activity, the accommodation requested, and the frequency of the accommodation. The request also must be delivered with reasonable anticipation. An employer must respond to any such request in writing within seven business days, unless the religious practice will occur before that time. Failure to respond within this time creates a presumption that the request was granted by the employer. Any denial must be in writing and explain the reasoning and the excessive difficulty justifying such denial. An employer may deny a request if the employee insists on the most onerous accommodation.


In additional to existing remedies for religious discrimination, under the new regulations, an aggrieved employee can file a complaint against an employer for violations of these provisions before the PR-DOL Labor Standards Bureau, which shall investigate and request an employer’s response within 10 calendar days. An employer’s failure to respond or a finding of violation will result in a referral to the PR-DOL Office of Mediation and Adjudication for adjudicative proceedings.

A finding of a violation will result in a fine of a minimum of $1,000 and a maximum of $5,000 in addition to an order to accommodate the religious practice.


Employers should ensure that their procedures for requesting religious accommodation comply with the tight deadline imposed by the regulation. Jackson Lewis attorneys are available to answer inquiries regarding this and other workplace developments.

©2017 Jackson Lewis P.C. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Jackson Lewis and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Reproduction of this material in whole or in part is prohibited without the express prior written consent of Jackson Lewis P.C., a law firm with more than 900 attorneys in major cities nationwide serving clients across a wide range of practices and industries. Having built its reputation on providing premier workplace law representation to management, the firm has grown to include leading practices in the areas of government relations, healthcare and sports law. For more information, visit

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

March 20, 2019

New Jersey Prohibits Enforcement of Non-Disclosure Provisions in Settlement Agreements, Other Contracts

March 20, 2019

A sweeping amendment to the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (LAD) bars enforcement of non-disclosure provisions in settlement agreements and employment contracts, and prohibits the waiver of substantive and procedural rights under the statute. The amendment applies to all contracts and agreements entered into, renewed, modified, or... Read More

February 28, 2019

Portland, Oregon, Bars Discrimination Against Atheists, Agnostics

February 28, 2019

An amendment to the civil rights code of Portland, Oregon, extends protections against discrimination in employment, housing, and public accommodations to atheists, agnostics, and other “non-believers.” Religious facilities are expressly exempt. The Portland City Code, chapter 23.01, already prohibits discrimination on the basis of... Read More

February 26, 2019

New York City and State Expand Protections for Transgender, Non-Binary, Gender Non-Conforming Workers

February 26, 2019

Protections for transgender, non-binary, and gender non-conforming employees in New York have been given a boost. Significant changes to the New York City Human Rights Law (NYCHRL) will expand the scope of prohibited discriminatory conduct. Additionally, New York State has enacted the Gender Expression Non-Discrimination Act (GENDA),... Read More

Related Practices