Search form

New York City Council Adds Caregiver Status to List of Protected Classifications

By Richard I. Greenberg and Daniel J. Jacobs
  • December 17, 2015

Following other recent pro-employee legislation enacted in New York City, the New York City Council on December 16, 2015, passed a bill banning employment discrimination based on an individual’s actual or perceived status as a caregiver. (See our articles, New York City Issues Enforcement Guidance Related to City’s Fair Chance Act and City Agency Issues Guidance on New York City’s Newly Effective Credit Check Law.)

Mayor Bill de Blasio is expected to sign the bill into law.

The New York City Human Rights Law (NYCHRL) prohibits discrimination in employment based on:

  • age,
  • race,
  • creed,
  • color,
  • national origin,
  • gender (including gender identity and sexual harassment),
  • disability,
  • marital status,
  • partnership status,
  • sexual orientation,
  • alienage, and
  • citizenship status.

The NYCHRL will be amended by adding “caregiver status” to this list, thus making discrimination based on an individual’s actual or perceived status as a caregiver unlawful.

This means that an employer will not be able consider caregiver status in any decision-making, such as choosing not to hire a working mother with young children due to concerns the mother will be unable to meet the demands of the job, for example.

“Caregiver” is defined as “a person who provides direct and ongoing care for a minor child or care recipient” A “care recipient” is also defined under the law and means “a person with a disability who: (i) is a covered relative, or a person who resides in the caregiver’s household; and (ii) relies on the caregiver for medical care or to meet the needs of daily living.”

The definition of “covered relative” is also broad, and includes a caregiver’s:

  • child,
  • spouse,
  • domestic partner,
  • parent,
  • sibling,
  • grandchild or grandparent, or
  • the child or parent of the caregiver’s spouse or domestic partner, or any other individual in a familial relationship with the caregiver, as designated by the City Commission on Human Rights.

An earlier version of the bill included language requiring employers to make reasonable accommodation to individuals with family obligations “to enable [them] to satisfy the essential requisites of a job or to enjoy the right or rights in question provided that the caregiver status is known or should have been known by the employer.” Based on hearing transcripts, it appears the City Council intends to research and “drill down” on this issue further to determine how other courts and human rights commissions have explored the parameters of reasonable accommodations in this context. Council Member Lander appeared cognizant of the difficulty employers could face if an overly broad accommodation obligation is adopted. While there is currently no express statutory requirement for employers to attempt to accommodate caregiver employees, further amendment to the NYCHRL is possible, as the issue is clearly on the City Council’s docket.

All employers with New York City operations should review policies and practices and consider training programs to familiarize managers, particularly those with authority to make employment decisions, with the anti-discrimination law.

Jackson Lewis attorneys are available to answer inquiries regarding this and other workplace developments and assist with policy review and training.

©2015 Jackson Lewis P.C. This Update is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice nor does it create an attorney/client relationship between Jackson Lewis and any readers or recipients. Readers should consult counsel of their own choosing to discuss how these matters relate to their individual circumstances. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without the express written consent of Jackson Lewis.

This Update may be considered attorney advertising in some states. Furthermore, prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Jackson Lewis P.C. represents management exclusively in workplace law and related litigation. Our attorneys are available to assist employers in their compliance efforts and to represent employers in matters before state and federal courts and administrative agencies. For more information, please contact the attorney(s) listed or the Jackson Lewis attorney with whom you regularly work.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

February 23, 2018

Foreign Parent Company is Joint Employer with Subsidiary for Employment Claims, Court Rules

February 23, 2018

A foreign parent company can be held jointly liable for employment claims against its U.S. subsidiary, a federal district court has held. Middlebrooks v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., No. 17-00412 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 1, 2018). The employee brought claims against his former employer, Teva USA, and its parent company, Teva Israel, alleging... Read More

February 20, 2018

Ban-the-Box Laws in Spokane, Washington, and Kansas City, Missouri

February 20, 2018

State and local jurisdictions have continued to consider and enact legislation restricting employers from inquiring about a job applicant’s criminal background during the initial stages of the application process. Two of the latest enactments are in Spokane, Washington, and Kansas City, Missouri. Some ban-the-box ordinances are... Read More

February 12, 2018

EEOC: Retaliation Tops Discrimination Charges Filed in Fiscal Year 2017

February 12, 2018

Retaliation was the most common workplace discrimination charge received by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in fiscal year (FY) 2017, according to the agency. (The fiscal year runs from October 1 to September 30.) Retaliation has been at the top since FY 2010. A total of 84,254 charges were filed with the agency... Read More

Related Practices