Search form

New York City May Ban Questions about Salary History

By Jonathan L. Bing
  • September 21, 2016

A bill in the City Council of New York City would prohibit employers from inquiring about a prospective employee’s salary history. The bill’s purported aim is to close the gender pay gap by reducing the likelihood that women will be prejudiced by prior salary levels.

New York City Public Advocate Letitia James introduced Int. 1253 on August 16, 2016.

The bill states that if an employer is already aware of an applicant’s salary history, it is prohibited from relying on that information to determine salary. Exemptions from the ban are the limited circumstances where a federal, state, or local law authorizes the disclosure or verification of salary history for employment.
 
Int. 1253 already has the support of a majority of City Council Members — 28 of the Council’s 51 members have signed onto the bill. It is currently under consideration in the Committee on Civil Rights and could have a public hearing before the end of 2016. Under Council rules, the Committee must decide whether to hold a public hearing once a piece of legislation has 34 sponsors.
 
Int. 1253 was announced the same month that Massachusetts became the first state in the country to bar employers from asking applicants about salary history. It also follows a 2016 report by the Public Advocate finding wage disparities for women of color in New York City are significantly worse than the national average. Unlike the Massachusetts law, however, James’s bill does not allow employers to take into account certain other attributes of an applicant’s work history, such as experience and education, when determining variations in pay.

Legislation similar to James’s proposal has been introduced for several years in the New York State Legislature and was introduced in the New Jersey Assembly. (For details of the New Jersey proposal, see our article, New Jersey Bill Seeks to Bar Pre-Hire Inquiries into Candidate Compensation History.) To date, efforts to advance this type of legislation have been successful only in Massachusetts.
 
If passed by the City Council, Mayor Bill de Blasio is expected to sign the measure into law. In August, a City Hall spokesperson signaled the Mayor’s support for Int. 1253, saying, “[T]he de Blasio administration is deeply committed to creating a city where women and girls are treated fairly, and that includes the workplace.”

We will provide updates on the New York City bill as warranted. Please contact Jackson Lewis with any questions about this and other legal developments.

©2016 Jackson Lewis P.C. This Update is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice nor does it create an attorney/client relationship between Jackson Lewis and any readers or recipients. Readers should consult counsel of their own choosing to discuss how these matters relate to their individual circumstances. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without the express written consent of Jackson Lewis.

This Update may be considered attorney advertising in some states. Furthermore, prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Jackson Lewis P.C. represents management exclusively in workplace law and related litigation. Our attorneys are available to assist employers in their compliance efforts and to represent employers in matters before state and federal courts and administrative agencies. For more information, please contact the attorney(s) listed or the Jackson Lewis attorney with whom you regularly work.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

February 20, 2018

Georgia Supreme Court Clarifies Insurance Company is Not ‘Financial Institution’ in Garnishment Law

February 20, 2018

An insurance company named as a garnishee in a garnishment action is not a “financial institution” under Georgia’s garnishment statute when the garnishment is seeking earnings owed to its current or former employees. May 2016 Amendment Apparently responding to a federal judge’s 2015 ruling that portions of Georgia’s post-judgment... Read More

February 7, 2018

Déjà Vu: Implications of a Government Shutdown on Federal Contractors

February 7, 2018

For the second time in a month, for lack of agreement on funding the government long-term, we face the specter of a government shutdown. The government shutdown that began on January 20, 2018, lasted three days. Congress ended that shutdown after voting on a stopgap measure to fund the government until February 8, 2018. As that date... Read More

January 29, 2018

Fitness Industry Workplace Law Update – Winter 2018

January 29, 2018

Welcome to our premiere issue! Our goal is to keep fitness industry clients and contacts informed about employment and labor law issues that may affect your organizations. We hope you find this newsletter valuable and invite you to share it with interested colleagues and contacts. In this issue, we provide a brief summary of hot... Read More