Search form

OSHA Clarifies Cranes and Derricks in Construction Standard for Moving Grave Headstones, Monuments

  • September 14, 2016

Using a crane to move headstones and small monuments is “generally” not defined as construction, but the crane operator is still responsible for stringent worker-safety rules regarding crane operations, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration has advised in response to a question from an Arkansas granite and marble cemetery monument delivery company.

Sam J. Flocks, District 9 trustee of the Monument Builders of North America and a monument company owner, in a letter dated October 6, 2014, asked OSHA for guidance on its “cranes and derricks in construction” standard.

OSHA acting director of the directorate of construction Jeffrey A. Erskine first clarified that the business owner was requesting guidance on headstones and small monuments weighing between 100 pounds and 1,700 pounds, not larger mausoleums or columbaria, but still sometimes requiring assembly of several pieces, sealed with a water-resistant compound. He noted a crane is used to move the monuments or their pieces from a delivery truck’s bed either to the foundation or to a heavy-duty cart that is then pushed or pulled to a gravesite.

The OSHA official said that, based on rules in OSHA’s General Industry Standards (29 CFR 1910) and its Construction Standards (29 CFR 1926), pouring or installing a concrete foundation at gravesites for installation of a monument or headstone “would typically be considered construction work.” However, “simply moving a completed monument from the bed of a truck to the ground (or a completed foundation pad)” would “generally not be considered construction,” if it is done without “any alteration or improvement to the pad or monument following its placement on the pad.”

He further noted that it “would typically” be considered construction work if the job included “hoisting or positioning” of:

  • a “completed monument onto or within formwork on the ground as the foundation is being constructed”;
  • a “completed monument to where it would otherwise be joined or connected to another structure (including physically securing it to a precast foundation or securing its footings)”; or
  • “several pieces of a monument during its assembly.”

It does not matter if the monuments are loaded to a cart or the ground, Erskine continued. What matters is “what will happen to the monument, or pieces of it, when transported to the jobsite.”

He also said that a crane with a capacity over 2,000 pounds, de-rated to less than 2,000 pounds, is still subject to the entire crane standard, not a lower standard, based on the crane’s maximum rated lifting capacity.

Please contact Jackson Lewis with any questions about the Cranes and Derricks in Construction Standard.

©2016 Jackson Lewis P.C. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Jackson Lewis and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Reproduction of this material in whole or in part is prohibited without the express prior written consent of Jackson Lewis P.C., a law firm with more than 900 attorneys in major cities nationwide serving clients across a wide range of practices and industries. Having built its reputation on providing premier workplace law representation to management, the firm has grown to include leading practices in the areas of government relations, healthcare and sports law. For more information, visit www.jacksonlewis.com.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

January 23, 2019

U.S. House Committee to Focus on Workforce Protections

January 23, 2019

Signaling a renewed emphasis on workforce protections at the opening of the 116th Congress, the U.S. House of Representatives has changed the name of its committee with jurisdiction over labor matters back to the Committee on Education and Labor. It was called the Committee on Education and the Workforce when Republicans held the... Read More

January 7, 2019

2019: The Year Ahead for Employers

January 7, 2019

Over the past year, state and local governments responded in a variety of ways to national policy, and the midterm elections painted a picture of what’s in store for employers in 2019 and beyond. Jackson Lewis’ annual report outlines upcoming issues, trends, legislation and regulations employers need to be aware of in the coming year... Read More

January 2, 2019

Retail Industry Workplace Law Update – Winter 2019

January 2, 2019

Class Action Trends Report The latest issue of our quarterly report on developments in class action litigation focuses on “joint employers” and covers the following topics: Are you my employer? A patchwork of tests Only in California Prevention pointer Read the Report … OSHA: Certain Safety Incentive Programs, Post... Read More

Related Practices