Search form

OSHA Exempts Monorail Hoists from Cranes and Derricks Regulations

By Raymond Perez, II
  • July 18, 2017

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration has issued a new enforcement policy that excludes monorail hoists from regulations on cranes and derricks in constructions.

Stakeholders had argued that monorail hoists are not the same as cranes and derricks in construction, pointing out that these hoists are attached to fixed monorails mounted on trucks, trailers, scaffolding systems, and other equipment.

In a June 30, 2017 “interpretation letter,” OSHA said it will exclude monorail hoists from enforcement of its “Subpart CC – Cranes and Derricks in Construction” regulation, on the condition that employers meet OSHA requirements for overhead hoists and general training standards.

OSHA said, “Monorail hoists are not explicitly excluded from the scope of the rule, and OSHA has issued several letters of interpretation confirming the crane standard’s coverage of specific monorail hoists in certain construction operations.”

“Nonetheless,” it added, “as a number of stakeholders have pointed out, the standard is not a perfect fit for monorail hoists, and OSHA intends to consider rulemaking options to address this issue. The purpose of this memorandum is to announce a temporary enforcement policy pending the resolution of that rulemaking process.”

In an announcement, released on July 3, 2017, OSHA noted, “Some monorail hoists can be extended and contracted in only a fixed horizontal direction. They do not rotate, swing on a hinge, or boom out much farther than the equipment on which they are mounted. They are often used in construction to hoist precast concrete components, storage tanks, and mechanical equipment.”

OSHA added, “The general industry requirements for monorail hoists remain intact.”

Monorail hoists are used during construction to lift and place material, including precast concrete components (such as septic tanks, storm drains, and sewer conduits), storage tanks (such as propane and oil tanks), mechanical components (such as engines and commercial generators), trade-specific components (such as electrical transformers, industrial-spooled materials, and sewer lids), and temporary storage units.

In the agency’s announcement, director of the OSHA Directorate of Construction Dean McKenzie said, “This enforcement policy is a commonsense approach to addressing industry concerns while also ensuring workers are protected.”

In its June 30 interpretation letter, OSHA spelled out issues stakeholders raised, detailing “a number” of provisions of the crane standard that “add very little protection” when monorail hoists are used. These include:

  • Monorails are fixed and do not angle up or down, so the equipment does not require the elevated level of protections from power line contact required by the crane standard.
  • Monorails cannot boom out significantly beyond the wheelbase of a vehicle or the base of its supporting structure, and so the hoisting equipment does not pose the dangerous cantilevering and stability hazards addressed by the crane standard.
  • There is no need for specific protections from hazards posed by booming-out loads, boom-free fall, equipment-swing radius, or any crane-related hazards that would necessitate the use of such devices as level indicators, boom/jib stops, boom/jib limiting devices, boom length/radius indicators, and drum hoist rotation indicators.
  • Loads handled by monorail hoists are not heavy enough to trigger the need for a load-weighing device or the use of load charts to prevent overloading and tipping the hosting equipment.

Jackson Lewis attorneys are available to assist employers in understanding federal policy and complying with enforcement directives such as OSHA regulations.

©2017 Jackson Lewis P.C. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Jackson Lewis and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Reproduction of this material in whole or in part is prohibited without the express prior written consent of Jackson Lewis P.C., a law firm with more than 900 attorneys in major cities nationwide serving clients across a wide range of practices and industries. Having built its reputation on providing premier workplace law representation to management, the firm has grown to include leading practices in the areas of government relations, healthcare and sports law. For more information, visit www.jacksonlewis.com.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

January 23, 2019

U.S. House Committee to Focus on Workforce Protections

January 23, 2019

Signaling a renewed emphasis on workforce protections at the opening of the 116th Congress, the U.S. House of Representatives has changed the name of its committee with jurisdiction over labor matters back to the Committee on Education and Labor. It was called the Committee on Education and the Workforce when Republicans held the... Read More

January 7, 2019

2019: The Year Ahead for Employers

January 7, 2019

Over the past year, state and local governments responded in a variety of ways to national policy, and the midterm elections painted a picture of what’s in store for employers in 2019 and beyond. Jackson Lewis’ annual report outlines upcoming issues, trends, legislation and regulations employers need to be aware of in the coming year... Read More

January 2, 2019

Retail Industry Workplace Law Update – Winter 2019

January 2, 2019

Class Action Trends Report The latest issue of our quarterly report on developments in class action litigation focuses on “joint employers” and covers the following topics: Are you my employer? A patchwork of tests Only in California Prevention pointer Read the Report … OSHA: Certain Safety Incentive Programs, Post... Read More

Related Practices