Search form

Part-Time Employees Get First Chance at Extra Hours under New San José Ordinance

By Cary G. Palmer and Mark S. Askanas
  • February 3, 2017

Employers in San José, California, must offer additional work hours to existing qualified part-time employees before hiring new employees beginning March 13, 2017, under the Opportunity to Work Ordinance.

Covered Employers and Employees

The Ordinance, or Measure E, passed by voters in 2016, applies to San José employers (including private and non-profit employers) who employ at least 36 employees and who are subject to the San José Business License Tax or maintain a facility in the city. Covered employers must offer existing part-time employees additional work hours before hiring new employees. “New employees” under the Ordinance include the use of subcontractors and temporary staffing services.

The city’s January 27, 2017, “preliminary” Frequently Asked Questions document on the Ordinance explains that a qualified employee is one who performs at least two hours of work in a calendar week for an employer within the geographic boundaries of San José and is entitled to payment of minimum wage under the California minimum wage law.

An employer must count both part-time and full-time qualified employees to determine whether it meets the 36-employee threshold. The FAQs explain that executive, administrative, and professional employees are not covered by the Ordinance and these employees do not count toward the 36-employee threshold.

If an employer is a “Chain” business (as defined by the Ordinance) not owned by a franchisee, the number of employees is determined by the total number of employees at every location of that Chain business, regardless of whether or not it is located within the city.

Collective Bargaining Agreement

Under the San José Minimum Wage Ordinance, the provisions of the new Opportunity to Work Ordinance may be waived by a collective bargaining agreement. The waiver must be in a bona fide CBA and must be in clear and unambiguous terms.

Recordkeeping and Poster

The Ordinance requires covered employers to retain the following records for at least four years:

  • Work schedules and employment and payroll records on current and former covered employees;
  • Copies of written offers to current and former covered part-time employees for additional work hours; and
  • Any other records the city’s Office of Equality Assurance may require of employers to demonstrate compliance.

The city has published a required poster (expected to be available in four languages) that covered employers must posted in a location where employees can read it easily.

Retaliation

It is unlawful for an employer to retaliate against employees who assert their right to be offered additional work hours under the Ordinance. There is a rebuttable presumption of retaliation if any adverse employment action is taken within 90 days of the employee exercising a right protected under the Ordinance.

Enforcement and Remedies

The city’s Office of Equality Assurance is responsible for administration and enforcement of the Ordinance. It will accept complaints of suspected violations and investigate where there appears to be a reasonable basis for the complaint. It may issue administrative citations and compliance orders, file a lawsuit, and seek reimbursement of the city’s administrative costs of enforcement.

The Office of Equality Assurance also may grant a hardship exemption of up to 12 months to an employer who demonstrates that:

  • It has undertaken, in good faith, all reasonable steps to comply with the Ordinance; and
  • Full and immediate compliance would be impracticable, impossible, or futile.

An aggrieved individual also may file a lawsuit to enforce the right to be offered additional hours. The aggrieved individual who prevails may recover back pay and reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs, among other remedies.

***

Employers should regularly review their policies and practices with employment counsel to ensure they address specific organizational needs effectively and comply with applicable law. Jackson Lewis attorneys are available to answer inquiries regarding the Ordinance and assist employers to achieve compliance. Please contact a Jackson Lewis attorney with any questions.

©2017 Jackson Lewis P.C. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Jackson Lewis and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Reproduction of this material in whole or in part is prohibited without the express prior written consent of Jackson Lewis P.C., a law firm that built its reputation on providing workplace law representation to management. Founded in 1958, the firm has grown to more than 900 attorneys in major cities nationwide serving clients across a wide range of practices and industries including government relations, healthcare and sports law. More information about Jackson Lewis can be found at www.jacksonlewis.com.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

November 6, 2019

Labor Department Proposes Changes to Clarify Use of FLSA’s ‘Fluctuating Workweek’ Pay Method

November 6, 2019

Persistent confusion over the Department of Labor’s (DOL) “fluctuating workweek” (FWW) pay method to satisfy employers’ obligation to pay overtime has deterred many from using it. Now, the DOL has proposed changes to clarify the pay method. Under DOL regulations on the FWW pay method, if certain conditions are met, an employer may pay... Read More

October 25, 2019

Labor Board Clarifies Boeing Work Rules Decision, Finds Confidentiality, Media Contact Rules Lawful

October 25, 2019

An employer’s confidentiality and non-disclosure rule and media contact rule do not violate the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has held. LA Specialty Produce Company, 368 NLRB No. 93 (2019). The Board also substantially clarified its decision in Boeing Co., 365 NLRB No. 154 (Dec. 15, 2017... Read More

October 25, 2019

Election Day is Coming – What are Your Obligations as an Employer?

October 25, 2019

With Election Day fast approaching, employers should ensure they are in compliance with state law requirements related to employee voting rights. While not all states impose requirements on employers, some impose time off obligations and notice requirements with the possibility of criminal or civil penalties for non-compliance.... Read More