Search form

Registration System Coming for Drone Users

  • November 11, 2015

Announcing a registration system is in the works for Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS), commonly known as drones, the federal government has essentially concluded the risks from these low-flying aircraft are so immediate and substantial that regulators do not have time to prepare comprehensive safety regulations.

In the joint statement by the Federal Aviation Administration and the U.S. Department of Transportation, officials said a task force consisting of representatives from the industry, government, and others has been formed, and will have until November 20 to recommend a registration system. The initiative has been fast-tracked because regulators want to have the system in place before Christmas (December 25), when sales of UAS are expected to peak. Besides new owners, the registration system also would extend retroactively to those who purchased robotic aircraft within the past few years.

“Registering unmanned aircraft will help build a culture of accountability and responsibility, especially with new users who have no experience operating in the U.S. aviation system,” said Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx. “It will help protect public safety in the air and on the ground.”

In addition to snarling air traffic, “nuisance” drones across the country have interfered with firefighters, flown into tall buildings, and crashed into bystanders on the ground, according to The Washington Post. Criminals have used them to smuggle contraband into prisons. Some property owners have become so irritated by drones buzzing overhead that they have opened fire on them with shotguns. At a recent congressional hearing, Representative Peter A. DeFazio (D-Or.) recalled an incident in his state where residents reported that a “peeping Tom” drone had been peering in their windows.

Unlike recreational UAS users, who are largely unregulated, users that operate a UAS for commercial purposes are banned from flying their devices unless they obtain an authorization exemption from the FAA. This ban on commercial UAS operations will continue until the FAA can finalize new safety rules — a step the Post said will take at least another year. The registration system will affect both types of users, recreational and commercial. The good news for commercial UAS operators is that the task force will explore options to improve the current exemption process with a streamlined system that would make registration less burdensome.
The new system also will carry as-yet-unspecified monetary penalties for anyone who violates the requirements. The penalties for unregistered UAS devices likely will be separate from the FAA’s current enforcement actions against unauthorized or reckless operations of UAS devices.

FAA has already taken enforcement action against UAS operators who violate the agency’s prohibition on commercial operations, operate UAS devices in a careless or reckless manner, or fly a UAS device above 400 feet or within five miles of an airport without advance permission. In October, the agency proposed its largest penalty by far, $1.9 million, against a Chicago-based aerial photography company for conducting 65 unauthorized flights of UAS over populated cities and in congested airspace. A total of 43 of these flights were within controlled airspace surrounding the New York metropolitan area.

Jackson Lewis’ Workplace Safety and Health professionals caution that it is vital for businesses and employers who want to enter the UAS marketplace to understand that:

  • Operating a UAS for commercial purposes is illegal unless the operator (company, sole proprietor, and so on) obtains a written exemption from the FAA.
  • All UAS pilots are prohibited from flying a UAS in a reckless or unsafe manner.
  • Employers may be vicariously liable for employees operating a UAS in a reckless or unsafe manner.

©2015 Jackson Lewis P.C. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Jackson Lewis and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Reproduction of this material in whole or in part is prohibited without the express prior written consent of Jackson Lewis P.C., a law firm with more than 900 attorneys in major cities nationwide serving clients across a wide range of practices and industries. Having built its reputation on providing premier workplace law representation to management, the firm has grown to include leading practices in the areas of government relations, healthcare and sports law. For more information, visit

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

January 23, 2019

U.S. House Committee to Focus on Workforce Protections

January 23, 2019

Signaling a renewed emphasis on workforce protections at the opening of the 116th Congress, the U.S. House of Representatives has changed the name of its committee with jurisdiction over labor matters back to the Committee on Education and Labor. It was called the Committee on Education and the Workforce when Republicans held the... Read More

January 7, 2019

2019: The Year Ahead for Employers

January 7, 2019

Over the past year, state and local governments responded in a variety of ways to national policy, and the midterm elections painted a picture of what’s in store for employers in 2019 and beyond. Jackson Lewis’ annual report outlines upcoming issues, trends, legislation and regulations employers need to be aware of in the coming year... Read More

January 2, 2019

Retail Industry Workplace Law Update – Winter 2019

January 2, 2019

Class Action Trends Report The latest issue of our quarterly report on developments in class action litigation focuses on “joint employers” and covers the following topics: Are you my employer? A patchwork of tests Only in California Prevention pointer Read the Report … OSHA: Certain Safety Incentive Programs, Post... Read More

Related Practices