Search form

Scabby the Rat: Threatening Pest or Famous Labor Icon?

By Michael T. Mortensen
  • March 19, 2019

Employers have at least one way to rid themselves of Scabby the Rat, a staple of labor union protest, following a decision from a federal appeals court upholding an ordinance enacted by the Town of Grand Chute, Wisconsin, banning anything placed on a public right-of-way that might obstruct vision or distract passing drivers. Construction & Gen. Laborers’ Union 330 v. Town of Grand Chute, No. 18-1739 (7th Cir. Feb. 14, 2019). The Seventh Circuit has jurisdiction over Illinois, Indiana, and Wisconsin.

For almost 30 years, unions have used the inflatable rat (complete with red eyes and an unnecessarily gross pink belly) to protest employers for using non-union labor or anything else the union deems objectionable. Despite employers’ many efforts to exterminate the rat, Scabby has been a mainstay at rallies, protests, and strikes.

The Seventh Circuit said that, although it had “no doubt” the use of Scabby is a form of expression protected by the First Amendment, the law was valid because it was content-neutral, narrowly tailored to serve a significant governmental interest, and left open alternative ways for the union to communicate its message.

The Court also highlighted the importance of consistent enforcement as a basis of its decision. Successfully removing the inflatable rat or its friends, Fat Cat and Greedy Pig, will depend on a municipality’s prior actions as the mere existence of an ordinance will not be enough.

At the federal level, the National Labor Relations Board General Counsel Peter Robb reportedly supports eliminating the unions’ use of Scabby by overturning current precedent permitting its use as a non-threatening form of peaceful protest more akin to lawful handbilling than potentially unlawful confrontational picketing.

It may be difficult to convince courts that the use of Scabby the Rat is not shielded by the First Amendment because it is unlawfully coercive and threatening. Scabby’s status as a labor icon with his own Twitter and Facebook accounts and the relatively common practice of tourists in New York and Chicago taking photos with the famous inflatable rat add to the difficulty. Scabby and his clones likely will continue to infest worksites in the foreseeable future.

Please contact Jackson Lewis with any questions about this case or the Board.

©2019 Jackson Lewis P.C. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Jackson Lewis and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Reproduction of this material in whole or in part is prohibited without the express prior written consent of Jackson Lewis P.C., a law firm that built its reputation on providing workplace law representation to management. Founded in 1958, the firm has grown to more than 900 attorneys in major cities nationwide serving clients across a wide range of practices and industries including government relations, healthcare and sports law. More information about Jackson Lewis can be found at

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

May 20, 2019

Labor Board General Counsel’s Review of Employer Work Rules a Mixed Bag

May 20, 2019

The National Labor Relations Board’s (NLRB) General Counsel (GC) has issued an Advice Memorandum on whether unfair labor practice charges alleging four employer rules violated the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) have merit. In a Memorandum released on March 14, 2019, the GC concluded that the employer’s dress-code, confidential-... Read More

May 17, 2019

A Numbers Game: Labor Board Rules on Successor Employer’s Bargaining Obligation

May 17, 2019

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has held that an operator of a unionized nursing home pursuant to a lease agreement with the former owner and operator was a successor employer under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), despite the fact that a majority of its bargaining unit employees did not come from the bargaining unit of... Read More

May 15, 2019

Top Five Labor Law Developments for April 2019

May 15, 2019

National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) General Counsel Peter Robb urges the Board to return to its traditional joint-employer standard. In a brief filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit on April 17 and released on April 29, Robb stated his belief that the Court exceeded its authority in December 2018, when it... Read More

Related Practices