Search form

Senate Bill Takes Aim at 1,933% Increase in Data Collection Proposed in EEO-1 Pay Data Revisions

By F. Christopher Chrisbens, Stephanie E. Lewis and Laura A. Mitchell
  • March 22, 2016

Senate Bill 2693, the “EEOC Reform Act,” would put a halt to implementation of the proposed pay data revisions to the EEO-1 report so the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission instead can focus on the tremendous backlog of “76,408” discrimination charges pending at the close of fiscal year 2015.

The bill, introduced by Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee Chair Senator Lamar Alexander, submits that EEOC must do a much better job of determining the actual costs of the proposal and the agency has more pressing priorities that ought to be accomplished first.

The bill would require EEOC to better estimate the cost of collecting and securing the proposed pay data by gathering and ensuring the protection of federal employee pay data before implementing the EEO-1 revisions. Under the bill, EEOC will be required to:

• As a test case, collect federal employee pay data information from each federal Department or Agency corresponding to the same pay data EEOC proposes to collect regarding private employees;

• Verify, comply, and ensure the security and confidentiality of the federal employee data;

• Publish that federal employee data in the aggregate;

• Determine:

  • The number of EEOC employees, employee hours, and cost necessary to accomplish those tasks;
  • The number of EEOC employees and hours diverted from addressing pending charges to these tasks and publish that information;

• Using this information regarding federal employees as a gauge:

  • Calculate the number of EEOC employees, hours, and cost necessary to collect and protect pay data of private employees;
  • Determine the number of EEOC employees and hours diverted from addressing pending charges to these tasks for private employees and publish that information;
  • Publish this information; and

• Report all this published information to Congress.

EEOC would be required to collect, publish, and report this information annually.
In addition, EEOC would be required to develop software for securely archiving and protecting all this data. After the software is developed, EEOC must develop a detailed and specific plan (the “Comprehensive Plan”) for how the data would be used for enforcement purposes, a task which the bill submits EEOC has failed to accomplish.

After EEOC submits the first annual report to Congress and completes the Comprehensive Plan, EEOC would then be permitted to submit the published information and the Comprehensive Plan as part of its effort to obtain Office of Management and Budget approval to collect the proposed pay data from private employers.

Before implementing the revised EEO-1, EEOC also would be required to reduce its inventory of pending charges to “not more than 3,660” from the 76,408 pending at the close of FY 2015.

What does this mean? It would likely mean a significant delay, perhaps a year, in the implementation of the revised EEO-1. EEOC would need to fulfill the foregoing obligations as well as reduce its backlog of charges.

Moreover, the bill provides that if the revised EEO-1 is implemented before the bill is enacted, upon passage of the bill, EEOC must stop implementation until it complies with these requirements.

©2016 Jackson Lewis P.C. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Jackson Lewis and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Reproduction of this material in whole or in part is prohibited without the express prior written consent of Jackson Lewis P.C., a law firm with more than 900 attorneys in major cities nationwide serving clients across a wide range of practices and industries. Having built its reputation on providing premier workplace law representation to management, the firm has grown to include leading practices in the areas of government relations, healthcare and sports law. For more information, visit www.jacksonlewis.com.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

March 21, 2019

Rethinking Pay Equity: Who is ‘Comparable’ for Pay Equity Purposes?

March 21, 2019

This is the second article in our four-part series titled “Rethinking Pay Equity,” designed to provide practical guidance to help employers understand and address the many new rules, regulations, and best practices around pay equity in preparation for Equal Pay Day 2019. This article focuses on identifying “who” will be compared for... Read More

March 19, 2019

Pay Equity for Women Filling Labor Shortage in Construction Industry

March 19, 2019

While the country’s construction industry is booming, with around $1 trillion in new projects, 79 percent of construction companies nationwide reported the need to hire more employees to meet the demand. With high demand and low supply, it is a prime time for women to fill that labor gap. CNBC reported that women make up only 9.1... Read More

March 15, 2019

New Jersey Labor Department Revises Equal Pay Act Data Reporting Requirements

March 15, 2019

The New Jersey Department of Labor (NJDOL) has revised the state equal pay law’s reporting requirements for employers that provide qualifying services or perform public works (e.g., construction, demolition, repairs, and so on) to New Jersey and its agencies to clarify which employees must be included in the annual reporting. The... Read More