Search form

Senate Bill Takes Aim at 1,933% Increase in Data Collection Proposed in EEO-1 Pay Data Revisions

By F. Christopher Chrisbens, Stephanie E. Lewis and Laura A. Mitchell
  • March 22, 2016

Senate Bill 2693, the “EEOC Reform Act,” would put a halt to implementation of the proposed pay data revisions to the EEO-1 report so the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission instead can focus on the tremendous backlog of “76,408” discrimination charges pending at the close of fiscal year 2015.

The bill, introduced by Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee Chair Senator Lamar Alexander, submits that EEOC must do a much better job of determining the actual costs of the proposal and the agency has more pressing priorities that ought to be accomplished first.

The bill would require EEOC to better estimate the cost of collecting and securing the proposed pay data by gathering and ensuring the protection of federal employee pay data before implementing the EEO-1 revisions. Under the bill, EEOC will be required to:

• As a test case, collect federal employee pay data information from each federal Department or Agency corresponding to the same pay data EEOC proposes to collect regarding private employees;

• Verify, comply, and ensure the security and confidentiality of the federal employee data;

• Publish that federal employee data in the aggregate;

• Determine:

  • The number of EEOC employees, employee hours, and cost necessary to accomplish those tasks;
  • The number of EEOC employees and hours diverted from addressing pending charges to these tasks and publish that information;

• Using this information regarding federal employees as a gauge:

  • Calculate the number of EEOC employees, hours, and cost necessary to collect and protect pay data of private employees;
  • Determine the number of EEOC employees and hours diverted from addressing pending charges to these tasks for private employees and publish that information;
  • Publish this information; and

• Report all this published information to Congress.

EEOC would be required to collect, publish, and report this information annually.
In addition, EEOC would be required to develop software for securely archiving and protecting all this data. After the software is developed, EEOC must develop a detailed and specific plan (the “Comprehensive Plan”) for how the data would be used for enforcement purposes, a task which the bill submits EEOC has failed to accomplish.

After EEOC submits the first annual report to Congress and completes the Comprehensive Plan, EEOC would then be permitted to submit the published information and the Comprehensive Plan as part of its effort to obtain Office of Management and Budget approval to collect the proposed pay data from private employers.

Before implementing the revised EEO-1, EEOC also would be required to reduce its inventory of pending charges to “not more than 3,660” from the 76,408 pending at the close of FY 2015.

What does this mean? It would likely mean a significant delay, perhaps a year, in the implementation of the revised EEO-1. EEOC would need to fulfill the foregoing obligations as well as reduce its backlog of charges.

Moreover, the bill provides that if the revised EEO-1 is implemented before the bill is enacted, upon passage of the bill, EEOC must stop implementation until it complies with these requirements.

©2016 Jackson Lewis P.C. This Update is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice nor does it create an attorney/client relationship between Jackson Lewis and any readers or recipients. Readers should consult counsel of their own choosing to discuss how these matters relate to their individual circumstances. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without the express written consent of Jackson Lewis.

This Update may be considered attorney advertising in some states. Furthermore, prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Jackson Lewis P.C. represents management exclusively in workplace law and related litigation. Our attorneys are available to assist employers in their compliance efforts and to represent employers in matters before state and federal courts and administrative agencies. For more information, please contact the attorney(s) listed or the Jackson Lewis attorney with whom you regularly work.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

June 11, 2018

Class Action Stacking Is Not Permitted, U.S. Supreme Court Rules

June 11, 2018

Once class action certification has been denied, a putative class member may not start a new class action beyond the applicable statute of limitations, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. China Agritech, Inc. v. Resh, No. 17-432 (June 11, 2018). Justice Sonia Sotomayor filed an opinion... Read More

June 5, 2018

The Wait is Over for Legalized Sports Gambling in New York

June 5, 2018

A provision in New York’s 2013 Racing, Pari-Mutuel Wagering and Breeding Law authorizing casinos to take bets on sporting events had been held in suspension because of the federal ban on state-regulated sports wagering. Now, as a result of the U.S. Supreme Court’s striking down the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act of 1992 (... Read More

May 31, 2018

Connecticut Bans Inquiries into Applicants’ Wage and Salary History

May 31, 2018

Connecticut is the latest state to prohibit employers from asking prospective employees about past compensation. Effective January 1, 2019, employers may not ask (directly or through a third party) about a prospective employee’s wage and salary history unless the prospective employee volunteers the information. According to Governor... Read More