Search form

Senate Votes to Disapprove Obama-Era Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces Executive Order

By Leslie A. Stout-Tabackman, Laura A. Mitchell and F. Christopher Chrisbens
  • March 7, 2017

The U.S. Senate has passed, by a single-vote margin, a joint resolution previously passed by the U.S. House that “disapproves” President Barack Obama’s 2014 Executive Order 13673: Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces, often called the “blacklisting” executive order. (For more on Executive Order 13673, see our articles, ‘Blacklisting’ Rules for Government Contractors Proposed by Federal Agencies under Executive Order and DOL and FAR Council Publish Final ‘Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces’ Rules for Government Contractors.)

The joint resolution, authorized by the Congressional Review Act, is headed for President Donald Trump’s signature, the last hurdle to the demise of the “blacklisting” regulations. Trump is expected to sign the joint resolution without much deliberation.

Most provisions of Executive Order 13673 are on hold. A U.S. District Court in Texas in October 2016 halted implementation of the “labor law violation” reporting provision of the FAR Council’s final rule implementing the Order, as well as the prohibition of mandatory arbitration agreements. (See our article, Texas Federal Court Blocks Enforcement of Key Portions of Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces Rules.) Nonetheless, the “paycheck transparency” provisions took effect for new contracts on January 17, 2017. (See our article, Paycheck Transparency Mandates of Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces E.O. Take Effect January 1.) This left many contractors with compliance responsibilities for regulations in legal limbo, in light of the lawsuit and the results of the presidential election.

If Trump signs the resolution, the Order, the FAR provisions and DOL’s Guidance document will be dead. In addition, the lawsuit challenging the Order will be moot, and federal contractors will be free from the Order’s burdens and obligations, including the paycheck transparency obligations.

Federal contracting agencies likely will be directed to halt implementation of the pay transparency regulations as soon as the joint resolution is signed. Contractors that have the pay transparency provision in their contracts or in pending solicitations will want to pursue removing such provisions.

Please contact a Jackson Lewis attorney with any questions about this or other developments.

©2017 Jackson Lewis P.C. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Jackson Lewis and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Reproduction of this material in whole or in part is prohibited without the express prior written consent of Jackson Lewis P.C., a law firm with more than 900 attorneys in major cities nationwide serving clients across a wide range of practices and industries. Having built its reputation on providing premier workplace law representation to management, the firm has grown to include leading practices in the areas of government relations, healthcare and sports law. For more information, visit www.jacksonlewis.com.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

February 21, 2019

Beyond the Headlines: Illinois Amends State Minimum Wage Law

February 21, 2019

The Lifting Up Illinois Working Families Act amends the Illinois Minimum Wage Law (IMWL) to raise the state minimum wage in stages until it reaches $15.00 per hour. While the amendments’ increases to the minimum wage have received significant coverage, some of the most important changes to the IMWL should not be overlooked by employers.... Read More

February 15, 2019

Labor Board Returns to Pre-2014 Test for Determining if Individual Is an Independent Contractor

February 15, 2019

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has held that in deciding whether an individual is an independent contractor or an employee, it will return to focusing on the extent to which the arrangement between the ostensible employer and the alleged employee provided an “entrepreneurial opportunity” to the individual, overruling a 2014... Read More

February 14, 2019

Top Five Labor Law Developments for January 2019

February 14, 2019

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) reinstated its pre-2014 standard for determining whether an individual is an independent contractor or an employee. SuperShuttle DFW, Inc., 367 NLRB No. 75 (Jan. 25, 2019). The NLRB determined that the employer’s shuttle van drivers were not employees, but independent contractors. Thus, they... Read More