Search form

St. Paul is Second Minnesota City to Weigh Paid Sick Leave Ordinance

  • January 28, 2016

Minnesota’s Twin Cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul are both preparing to enact local laws affording employees paid sick leave. St. Paul Mayor Chris Coleman and the St. Paul City Council have announced that the Council will convene a Task Force to discuss an ordinance mandating that all private and public sector employees be provided earned sick and safe time for working in Saint Paul.

The Task Force, chosen by the Mayor and Council, will make recommendations to the Saint Paul Human Rights and Equal Economic Opportunity (HREEO) Commission, which will in turn make recommendations to the Mayor and the City Council.

“Earned sick and safe time is a matter of public health in Saint Paul, and we need to get this done. We understand that many people will apply to serve on the task force,” said City Councilmember Dai Thao on January 26. “We want to make it an inclusive conversation, while also recognizing that people will need other avenues to participate as well.”

The Mayor and Council also announced plans to extend earned sick and safe time to all city employees as of January 1, 2017.

Minneapolis has been studying a similar paid sick leave proposal for some time and is much closer than St. Paul to implementation. In October 2015, the Minneapolis City Council created a 15-member Workplace Regulations Partnership to seek feedback from the public. The Partnership is scheduled to present a proposal for a paid sick leave ordinance to the full Minneapolis City Council at its regular meeting scheduled for February 24, 2016. An earlier Minneapolis proposal on a “fair scheduling” ordinance was shelved by Minneapolis Mayor Betsy Hodges after concerns were raised by the local business community.

The Twin Cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul are part of a growing list of cities around the country that have enacted or are looking at imposing paid sick leave requirements on employers.

Jackson Lewis attorneys are available to answer inquiries regarding this and other workplace developments.

©2016 Jackson Lewis P.C. This Update is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice nor does it create an attorney/client relationship between Jackson Lewis and any readers or recipients. Readers should consult counsel of their own choosing to discuss how these matters relate to their individual circumstances. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without the express written consent of Jackson Lewis.

This Update may be considered attorney advertising in some states. Furthermore, prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Jackson Lewis P.C. represents management exclusively in workplace law and related litigation. Our attorneys are available to assist employers in their compliance efforts and to represent employers in matters before state and federal courts and administrative agencies. For more information, please contact the attorney(s) listed or the Jackson Lewis attorney with whom you regularly work.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

November 12, 2018

Voters in Three States Approve Marijuana Laws on Election Day

November 12, 2018

Three states approved new marijuana laws on Election Day 2018. Voters approved medical marijuana laws in Missouri and Utah, while Michigan voters approved a recreational marijuana law. Michigan: Recreational Marijuana Michigan Proposal 1 was passed by a majority (approximately 55% “Yes” and 45% “No”). Proposal 1, the Michigan... Read More

November 5, 2018

What Employers Should Watch For in Election 2018

November 5, 2018

Election Day may result in significant changes in our country’s labor and employment landscape. This article discusses some issues employers should watch closely. Arbitration Congressional Democrats have proposed legislation intended to overturn the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2018 ruling that employers do not violate the National Labor... Read More

October 29, 2018

Election Day is Coming – What are Your Obligations as an Employer?

October 29, 2018

With Election Day fast approaching, employers should ensure they are in compliance with state law requirements related to employee voting rights. While not all states impose requirements on employers, some impose time off obligations and notice requirements with the possibility of criminal or civil penalties for non-compliance.... Read More