Search form

State OSHA Programs Can Be Significant Source of Big Fines

By Carla J. Gunnin
  • November 6, 2015

While big penalties levied by the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration dominate the headlines, monetary fines imposed by health and safety agencies in states backed by OSHA can be significant, too.

So-called State Plan states are those with OSHA-approved job safety and health programs. The federal agency provides up to 50 percent of the funding for these programs, which must be at least as effective as their federal counterpart. States without such a program are prevented from enforcing OSHA standards. Twenty-one states and Puerto Rico have OSHA-approved State Plans that cover both private and public sector workers. Six additional states and the Virgin Islands have OSHA-approved State Plans that cover only state, territorial, and local government public sector workers. Authorization for the state plans comes from Section 18 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act.

Since June, six State Plan states have levied six-figure penalties totaling about $2.9 million against 10 companies for alleged safety and health violations. California’s safety agency, Cal/OSHA, charged a meat byproducts processing company, a door manufacturer, a refinery, and two construction firms with violations amounting to $1.6 million. Michigan’s OSHA program fined a foundry $638,450; a bulk shipping firm in Washington State received a $218,450 fine; a water utility in New Mexico, $144,000; a company that regulates and administers transportation programs in North Carolina, $140,000; and an Indiana shipyard, $112,500.

These penalties highlight that many states carry as big an enforcement stick as federal OSHA. Employers should be as vigilant in monitoring state occupational safety and health enforcement practices as they are with the federal agency’s activities.

©2015 Jackson Lewis P.C. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Jackson Lewis and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Reproduction of this material in whole or in part is prohibited without the express prior written consent of Jackson Lewis P.C., a law firm that built its reputation on providing workplace law representation to management. Founded in 1958, the firm has grown to more than 900 attorneys in major cities nationwide serving clients across a wide range of practices and industries including government relations, healthcare and sports law. More information about Jackson Lewis can be found at www.jacksonlewis.com.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

August 21, 2019

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Agency Proposes Changes to Hours of Service Rules for Truck Drivers

August 21, 2019

The U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) has published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on changes to the hours of service (HOS) rules. Background First adopted in 1937, FMCSA’s HOS rules set the permitted operating hours of commercial drivers. FMCSA mandated use of... Read More

June 25, 2019

The Aging Construction Industry: Keeping Skilled Employees Longer

June 25, 2019

Workers in the construction industry tend to be older than those in other industries, according to the National Association of Home Builders. The median age of construction workers is 42 years old, a year older than the median in the national labor force. Further, the median age of workers in the industry is 44-45 years old in several U.... Read More

January 23, 2019

U.S. House Committee to Focus on Workforce Protections

January 23, 2019

Signaling a renewed emphasis on workforce protections at the opening of the 116th Congress, the U.S. House of Representatives has changed the name of its committee with jurisdiction over labor matters back to the Committee on Education and Labor. It was called the Committee on Education and the Workforce when Republicans held the... Read More

Related Practices