Search form

State Safety Plans Object to Federal OSHA Fine Increases

By Nickole C. Winnett
  • September 8, 2016

State workplace safety agencies raised objections to adopting federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s penalty increases in letters to the Department of Labor on OSHA’s interim final rule, Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Catch-Up Adjustment. State agencies with OSHA-approved job safety and health programs maintain that OSHA exceeded its authority in imposing the new fine structure on State Plans.

Under the Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015, Congress authorized OSHA to increase its fines, unchanged since 1990, to adjust for inflation. (For more, see our article, Maximum OSHA Fines for Safety Violations Increase by 78%.) In the interim final rule, DOL changed how State Plans must act to keep their federal approval under the State Plan Indices of Effectiveness. The federal agency provides up to 50 percent of the funding for State Plan programs, which must be “at least as effective” as their federal counterpart. DOL stated, “OSHA will require State Plans to increase their penalties to reflect the federal penalties increases at the state levels in order to maintain their ‘at least as effective’ status.”

State officials said federal officials should not be allowed to use the new federal law to change the federal regulations that state agencies must follow to keep their federal approval. Further, they said the law should apply only to federal, not state, fines.

Jim Krueger, Chair of the Occupational Safety and Health State Plan Association, an organization of 28 states and territories with OSHA-approved state plans, said the rule should not be “misunderstood” to mandate that states “more closely mirror federal penalty practices.” Mr. Krueger also is Director of Compliance of the Minnesota state plan.

State officials from Kentucky, New Mexico, and North Carolina also sent letters of objection. Butch Tongate, Acting Cabinet Secretary of the New Mexico Environment Department, called the increases “improper.” He wrote that New Mexico “encourages” the Labor Department to “reconsider its actions in this rulemaking” so that it moves forward with the “reasoned and well informed rulemaking” procedures of the Administrative Procedure Act.

Derrick K. Ramsey, Secretary of the Kentucky Labor Cabinet, and Ervin Dimeny, Commissioner of the Department of Workplace Standards, said the change to the State Plan Indices of Effectiveness is “arbitrary, capricious, and an abuse of discretion because it is not based upon a reasoned analysis as required by the Administrative Procedure Act and it was done through interim final rulemaking.”

Without changes from OSHA, State Plan penalties will likely increase.

Jackson Lewis assists employers to avoid OSHA violations and reduce the monetary impact of proposed fines for any alleged violations.

©2016 Jackson Lewis P.C. This Update is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice nor does it create an attorney/client relationship between Jackson Lewis and any readers or recipients. Readers should consult counsel of their own choosing to discuss how these matters relate to their individual circumstances. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without the express written consent of Jackson Lewis.

This Update may be considered attorney advertising in some states. Furthermore, prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Jackson Lewis P.C. represents management exclusively in workplace law and related litigation. Our attorneys are available to assist employers in their compliance efforts and to represent employers in matters before state and federal courts and administrative agencies. For more information, please contact the attorney(s) listed or the Jackson Lewis attorney with whom you regularly work.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

February 21, 2018

Maine Recreational Marijuana Law Limits Drug Testing, Disciplinary Consequences Imposed by Employers

February 21, 2018

A provision of Maine’s recreational marijuana law prohibits employers from taking adverse employment actions for off-premises marijuana use, as of February 1, 2018. This law effectively prevents Maine employers from testing for marijuana for pre-employment purposes. The law also affects employers who employ employees subject to federal... Read More

January 29, 2018

Fitness Industry Workplace Law Update – Winter 2018

January 29, 2018

Welcome to our premiere issue! Our goal is to keep fitness industry clients and contacts informed about employment and labor law issues that may affect your organizations. We hope you find this newsletter valuable and invite you to share it with interested colleagues and contacts. In this issue, we provide a brief summary of hot... Read More

January 24, 2018

2018: The Year Ahead for Employers

January 24, 2018

An executive summary of recent changes in workplace law and a look ahead to 2018. Read More

Related Practices