Search form

  • February 22, 2018
  1. Management-side labor and employment lawyer John Ring has been nominated by President Donald Trump to fill the vacant seat on the five-member National Labor Relations Board. If confirmed, Ring would replace former-Board Chairman Philip Miscimarra, a Republican, and restore a 3-2 Republican majority to the Board. Miscimarra’s term ended on December 16, 2017. Ring’s confirmation hearing before the U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, originally scheduled for February, is scheduled to take place on March 1, although some expect it may be further postponed.


  2. The NLRB General Counsel’s office issued a Case Processing Memo on January 29, 2018. The Memo sets out a number of suggested changes to the NLRB’s procedures. The Memo advocates for changes to the Board’s rules that, among other things, would: (1) require parties in Board cases to respond to Board inquiries within two days; (2) direct Board officials to seek settlements in all cases; and (3) reduce the length of investigations. The Memo asks Board staff for input on the proposed changes.


  3. NLRB General Counsel Peter Robb has announced his desire to centralize the agency’s decision-making process. On a January 11, 2018, Board conference call, Robb stated his plans to reorganize the Board’s 26 regional offices into fewer districts or regions, run by officials reporting directly to Robb’s office. This would place decision-making authority in the hands of officials who are not located in the local regional offices. Following the January 11 call, a committee of NLRB regional directors wrote to Robb to express “grave concerns” about the possible restructuring, arguing the changes would negatively affect the Board’s ability to enforce the National Labor Relations Act. A group of 56 former regional directors penned a separate letter to Robb, expressing similar reservations. It is likely that Robb’s changes, if formally proposed, would require public comments and approval by the NLRB.


  4. The NLRB on January 26 announced that it is extending the time for filing responses to its request for information regarding its 2014 election rule. The new deadline for submissions is March 19, 2018. The NLRB asked whether the 2014 rule should be retained as-is, retained with modifications, or rescinded. The election rule changes, which took effect on April 14, 2015, allowed union organizing to move at an accelerated pace by, among other things, significantly reducing the time between the filing of a representation petition and the election from an average of approximately six weeks to an average of 23 days.


  5. The U.S. Supreme Court has scheduled oral arguments for February 26 in Janus v. AFSCME Council 31, No. 16-1466, the case set to decide whether unions legally can require public sector non-members to pay union fees. This will be the second time in the past two years that the Court will consider the constitutionality of such mandatory fees. In Friedrichs v. Cal. Teachers Ass’n, No. 14-915, the Supreme Court deadlocked 4-4 on the issue after the death of Justice Antonin Scalia. This resulted in the automatic affirmance of a lower court decision upholding the legality of the fees. Many expect that the arrival of Justice Neil Gorsuch on the Court will provide opponents of the fees the win they sought in Friedrichs.

Please contact your Jackson Lewis attorney to discuss these developments and your specific organizational needs.

©2018 Jackson Lewis P.C. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Jackson Lewis and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Reproduction of this material in whole or in part is prohibited without the express prior written consent of Jackson Lewis P.C., a law firm with more than 900 attorneys in major cities nationwide serving clients across a wide range of practices and industries. Having built its reputation on providing premier workplace law representation to management, the firm has grown to include leading practices in the areas of government relations, healthcare and sports law. For more information, visit

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

March 19, 2019

Scabby the Rat: Threatening Pest or Famous Labor Icon?

March 19, 2019

Employers have at least one way to rid themselves of Scabby the Rat, a staple of labor union protest, following a decision from a federal appeals court upholding an ordinance enacted by the Town of Grand Chute, Wisconsin, banning anything placed on a public right-of-way that might obstruct vision or distract passing drivers. Construction... Read More

March 11, 2019

Top Five Labor Law Developments for February 2019

March 11, 2019

National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) Member Mark Gaston Pearce has withdrawn his name from consideration for another term on the Board. Pearce reportedly explained his decision by stating it felt best to “remove myself from the center of a political tug of war.” Pearce’s nomination had stalled in the U.S. Senate, which ended its last... Read More

February 15, 2019

Labor Board Returns to Pre-2014 Test for Determining if Individual Is an Independent Contractor

February 15, 2019

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has held that in deciding whether an individual is an independent contractor or an employee, it will return to focusing on the extent to which the arrangement between the ostensible employer and the alleged employee provided an “entrepreneurial opportunity” to the individual, overruling a 2014... Read More

Related Practices