Search form

Top Five Labor Law Developments for November 2017

By Philip B. Rosen, Jonathan J. Spitz, Howard M. Bloom, Richard I. Greenberg and Christopher M. Repole
  • December 21, 2017
  1. John Ring, a management-side labor and employment attorney, reportedly is undergoing background checks to become President Donald Trump’s nominee to fill the seat on the National Labor Relations Board that Chairman Philip Miscimarra vacated on December 16. Whether Ring will be the Administration’s nominee is uncertain, but his name is at the top of a short list of contenders for the seat. If nominated and confirmed, Ring would return the Board, which currently has four Members, to a 3-2 Republican majority.

     

  2. NLRB Member William Emanuel has disclosed the names of more than 100 former clients and stated he will recuse himself from NLRB matters involving them. The disclosure on November 21 follows Emanuel’s previous disclosure of 48 clients, about whom he made the same pledge of recusal. Before his confirmation, Emanuel worked as a management-side labor and employment attorney focused on providing union avoidance advice to large corporate clients, among other areas. Emanuel also had pledged to recuse himself from NLRB matters involving his former law firm.

     

  3. The NLRB and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission are working together to address a perceived conflict between the two agencies over employers’ rules requiring confidentiality during investigations into workplace harassment. At a meeting at the American Bar Association’s Labor and Employment Law conference on November 10, the Board’s then-acting General Counsel, Jennifer Abruzzo, told attendees that the NLRB is working with EEOC staff on joint guidance attempting to reconcile the agencies’ positions. The NLRB has taken a hard line against blanket confidentiality requirements in investigations, finding such rules chill protected employee discussions with colleagues. Meanwhile, the EEOC has promoted confidentiality in investigations as essential to ensuring that employees feel free to report workplace harassment. We will discuss in our next issue the NLRB overruling Lutheran Heritage-Livonia, which set forth the Board’s test for determining when employer rules interfere with employees’ Section 7 rights, in The Boeing Corp., 365 NLRB No. 164 (Dec. 15, 2017). It remains to be seen how that decision will affect how the NLRB views these blanket confidentiality requirements.

     

  4. Bloomberg BNA reported on November 29 that the average wage increase in the first year of newly signed union contracts in the U.S. was 2.6 percent during the year ending on November 27, down from 2.7 percent over the same period in 2016. Bloomberg BNA compiled data from more than 600 collective bargaining agreements drawn from a variety of industries.

     

  5. The NLRB has released data on the impact of the “Quickie Election Rule.” According to the November 17 report, for fiscal year 2017, the median time from an election petition filing to an election was 23 days – more than two weeks shorter than the average of 38 days under the Board’s pre-2015 procedures. The 2015 Rule amended the Board’s procedures for handling union elections, significantly shortening the time employers have to conduct election campaigns. We will discuss in our next issue the NLRB’s December 13 announcement that it was soliciting public comments on the quickie election rule, asking whether the rule should be rescinded, modified, or retained. (For more, see our blog post, Labor Board Asks: Retain, Modify, or Rescind ‘Quickie Election’ Rules?)

Please contact your Jackson Lewis attorney to discuss these developments and your specific organizational needs.

©2017 Jackson Lewis P.C. This Update is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice nor does it create an attorney/client relationship between Jackson Lewis and any readers or recipients. Readers should consult counsel of their own choosing to discuss how these matters relate to their individual circumstances. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without the express written consent of Jackson Lewis.

This Update may be considered attorney advertising in some states. Furthermore, prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Jackson Lewis P.C. represents management exclusively in workplace law and related litigation. Our attorneys are available to assist employers in their compliance efforts and to represent employers in matters before state and federal courts and administrative agencies. For more information, please contact the attorney(s) listed or the Jackson Lewis attorney with whom you regularly work.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

August 8, 2018

Missouri Right-to-Work Rejected by Voters

August 8, 2018

Missouri voters have rejected the state right-to-work law. Senate Bill 19, which would have made Missouri the nation’s 28th right-to-work state, was passed by the Missouri legislature on February 2, 2017, and signed into law by then-Governor Eric Greitens. Labor organizations and their supporters gathered enough signatures to keep the... Read More

July 19, 2018

Top Five Labor Law Developments for June 2018

July 19, 2018

Public sector employees who are non-members of a union cannot be legally required to pay agency or “fair share” fees as a condition of employment, the U.S. Supreme Court has held in a 5-4 ruling. Janus v. AFSCME Council 31, No. 16-1466 (June 27, 2018). The Court decided that a state’s enforcement of a provision in a collective... Read More

July 9, 2018

Brett Kavanaugh Nominated to U.S. Supreme Court

July 9, 2018

In the wake of Justice Anthony Kennedy’s retirement, President Donald Trump was presented with the rare opportunity to make his second U.S. Supreme Court nomination in as many years, nominating the Honorable Brett M. Kavanaugh to succeed Justice Kennedy. If confirmed by the Senate, Judge Kavanaugh would bring more than a dozen years of... Read More

Related Practices