Search form

Top Five Labor Law Developments for November 2017

By Philip B. Rosen, Jonathan J. Spitz, Howard M. Bloom, Richard I. Greenberg and Christopher M. Repole
  • December 21, 2017
  1. John Ring, a management-side labor and employment attorney, reportedly is undergoing background checks to become President Donald Trump’s nominee to fill the seat on the National Labor Relations Board that Chairman Philip Miscimarra vacated on December 16. Whether Ring will be the Administration’s nominee is uncertain, but his name is at the top of a short list of contenders for the seat. If nominated and confirmed, Ring would return the Board, which currently has four Members, to a 3-2 Republican majority.

     

  2. NLRB Member William Emanuel has disclosed the names of more than 100 former clients and stated he will recuse himself from NLRB matters involving them. The disclosure on November 21 follows Emanuel’s previous disclosure of 48 clients, about whom he made the same pledge of recusal. Before his confirmation, Emanuel worked as a management-side labor and employment attorney focused on providing union avoidance advice to large corporate clients, among other areas. Emanuel also had pledged to recuse himself from NLRB matters involving his former law firm.

     

  3. The NLRB and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission are working together to address a perceived conflict between the two agencies over employers’ rules requiring confidentiality during investigations into workplace harassment. At a meeting at the American Bar Association’s Labor and Employment Law conference on November 10, the Board’s then-acting General Counsel, Jennifer Abruzzo, told attendees that the NLRB is working with EEOC staff on joint guidance attempting to reconcile the agencies’ positions. The NLRB has taken a hard line against blanket confidentiality requirements in investigations, finding such rules chill protected employee discussions with colleagues. Meanwhile, the EEOC has promoted confidentiality in investigations as essential to ensuring that employees feel free to report workplace harassment. We will discuss in our next issue the NLRB overruling Lutheran Heritage-Livonia, which set forth the Board’s test for determining when employer rules interfere with employees’ Section 7 rights, in The Boeing Corp., 365 NLRB No. 164 (Dec. 15, 2017). It remains to be seen how that decision will affect how the NLRB views these blanket confidentiality requirements.

     

  4. Bloomberg BNA reported on November 29 that the average wage increase in the first year of newly signed union contracts in the U.S. was 2.6 percent during the year ending on November 27, down from 2.7 percent over the same period in 2016. Bloomberg BNA compiled data from more than 600 collective bargaining agreements drawn from a variety of industries.

     

  5. The NLRB has released data on the impact of the “Quickie Election Rule.” According to the November 17 report, for fiscal year 2017, the median time from an election petition filing to an election was 23 days – more than two weeks shorter than the average of 38 days under the Board’s pre-2015 procedures. The 2015 Rule amended the Board’s procedures for handling union elections, significantly shortening the time employers have to conduct election campaigns. We will discuss in our next issue the NLRB’s December 13 announcement that it was soliciting public comments on the quickie election rule, asking whether the rule should be rescinded, modified, or retained. (For more, see our blog post, Labor Board Asks: Retain, Modify, or Rescind ‘Quickie Election’ Rules?)

Please contact your Jackson Lewis attorney to discuss these developments and your specific organizational needs.

©2017 Jackson Lewis P.C. This Update is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice nor does it create an attorney/client relationship between Jackson Lewis and any readers or recipients. Readers should consult counsel of their own choosing to discuss how these matters relate to their individual circumstances. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without the express written consent of Jackson Lewis.

This Update may be considered attorney advertising in some states. Furthermore, prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Jackson Lewis P.C. represents management exclusively in workplace law and related litigation. Our attorneys are available to assist employers in their compliance efforts and to represent employers in matters before state and federal courts and administrative agencies. For more information, please contact the attorney(s) listed or the Jackson Lewis attorney with whom you regularly work.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

May 21, 2018

Supreme Court: Class Action Waivers in Employment Arbitration Agreements Do Not Violate Federal Labor Law

May 21, 2018

Class action waivers in employment arbitration agreements are enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), the U.S. Supreme Court has held in a much-anticipated decision in three critical cases. Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis, No. 16-285; Ernst & Young LLP et al. v. Morris et al., No. 16-300; National Labor Relations Board v.... Read More

May 21, 2018

Supreme Court Rules Class Action Waivers in Employment Arbitration Agreements Valid

May 21, 2018

Class action waivers in employment arbitration agreements do not violate federal law, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in a much-anticipated decision in three critical cases. Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis, No. 16-285; Ernst & Young LLP et al. v. Morris et al., No. 16-300; National Labor Relations Board v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc., et al.,... Read More

May 16, 2018

Top Five Labor Law Developments for April 2018

May 16, 2018

The U.S. Senate confirmed John Ring’s nomination to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) on April 11. Shortly thereafter, President Donald Trump named Ring as Board Chairman. Ring was sworn in as Chairman on April 16, replacing Republican Marvin Kaplan in that role. Trump nominated Ring, a management-side labor and employment... Read More

Related Practices