Search form

Top Five Labor Law Developments for November 2017

By Philip B. Rosen, Jonathan J. Spitz, Howard M. Bloom, Richard I. Greenberg and Christopher M. Repole
  • December 21, 2017
  1. John Ring, a management-side labor and employment attorney, reportedly is undergoing background checks to become President Donald Trump’s nominee to fill the seat on the National Labor Relations Board that Chairman Philip Miscimarra vacated on December 16. Whether Ring will be the Administration’s nominee is uncertain, but his name is at the top of a short list of contenders for the seat. If nominated and confirmed, Ring would return the Board, which currently has four Members, to a 3-2 Republican majority.

     

  2. NLRB Member William Emanuel has disclosed the names of more than 100 former clients and stated he will recuse himself from NLRB matters involving them. The disclosure on November 21 follows Emanuel’s previous disclosure of 48 clients, about whom he made the same pledge of recusal. Before his confirmation, Emanuel worked as a management-side labor and employment attorney focused on providing union avoidance advice to large corporate clients, among other areas. Emanuel also had pledged to recuse himself from NLRB matters involving his former law firm.

     

  3. The NLRB and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission are working together to address a perceived conflict between the two agencies over employers’ rules requiring confidentiality during investigations into workplace harassment. At a meeting at the American Bar Association’s Labor and Employment Law conference on November 10, the Board’s then-acting General Counsel, Jennifer Abruzzo, told attendees that the NLRB is working with EEOC staff on joint guidance attempting to reconcile the agencies’ positions. The NLRB has taken a hard line against blanket confidentiality requirements in investigations, finding such rules chill protected employee discussions with colleagues. Meanwhile, the EEOC has promoted confidentiality in investigations as essential to ensuring that employees feel free to report workplace harassment. We will discuss in our next issue the NLRB overruling Lutheran Heritage-Livonia, which set forth the Board’s test for determining when employer rules interfere with employees’ Section 7 rights, in The Boeing Corp., 365 NLRB No. 164 (Dec. 15, 2017). It remains to be seen how that decision will affect how the NLRB views these blanket confidentiality requirements.

     

  4. Bloomberg BNA reported on November 29 that the average wage increase in the first year of newly signed union contracts in the U.S. was 2.6 percent during the year ending on November 27, down from 2.7 percent over the same period in 2016. Bloomberg BNA compiled data from more than 600 collective bargaining agreements drawn from a variety of industries.

     

  5. The NLRB has released data on the impact of the “Quickie Election Rule.” According to the November 17 report, for fiscal year 2017, the median time from an election petition filing to an election was 23 days – more than two weeks shorter than the average of 38 days under the Board’s pre-2015 procedures. The 2015 Rule amended the Board’s procedures for handling union elections, significantly shortening the time employers have to conduct election campaigns. We will discuss in our next issue the NLRB’s December 13 announcement that it was soliciting public comments on the quickie election rule, asking whether the rule should be rescinded, modified, or retained. (For more, see our blog post, Labor Board Asks: Retain, Modify, or Rescind ‘Quickie Election’ Rules?)

Please contact your Jackson Lewis attorney to discuss these developments and your specific organizational needs.

©2017 Jackson Lewis P.C. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Jackson Lewis and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Reproduction of this material in whole or in part is prohibited without the express prior written consent of Jackson Lewis P.C., a law firm with more than 900 attorneys in major cities nationwide serving clients across a wide range of practices and industries. Having built its reputation on providing premier workplace law representation to management, the firm has grown to include leading practices in the areas of government relations, healthcare and sports law. For more information, visit www.jacksonlewis.com.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

April 15, 2019

Revamp of Mexico’s Federal Labor Laws: What U.S. Employers Need to Know

April 15, 2019

Employers with operations in Mexico must brace themselves for significant changes in the labor laws in their workplace. Mexico is expected to pass legislation that will effectively overhaul the country’s labor laws to a standard similar to that in the United States. The changes will reshape Mexico’s labor relations for a generation.... Read More

April 12, 2019

Top Five Labor Law Developments for March 2019

April 12, 2019

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) ruled that a private-sector union may not require non-member objectors (known as Beck objectors) to pay for its political lobbying expenses. United Nurses and Applied Professionals (Kent Hospital), 367 NLRB No. 94 (Mar. 1, 2019). Several of the employer’s workers had resigned their union... Read More

March 19, 2019

Scabby the Rat: Threatening Pest or Famous Labor Icon?

March 19, 2019

Employers have at least one way to rid themselves of Scabby the Rat, a staple of labor union protest, following a decision from a federal appeals court upholding an ordinance enacted by the Town of Grand Chute, Wisconsin, banning anything placed on a public right-of-way that might obstruct vision or distract passing drivers. Construction... Read More

Related Practices