Search form

Travel Ban Temporarily Enjoined

By Michael H. Neifach and Amy L. Peck
  • February 4, 2017

On Friday, February 3, and effective immediately, the travel restrictions for individuals from seven identified countries was halted by Judge James Robart of the Western District of Washington. In State of Washington, et al. v. Donald J. Trump, et al. Judge Robart granted a nationwide Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) prohibiting the Administration from implementing the Executive Order (E.O.) stating that “the circumstances brought before it today are such that it must intervene to fulfill its constitutional role” of “ensuring that the actions taken by the other two branches [of government] comport with our country’s law, and more importantly, our Constitution.” 

To comply with the Order, the Department of Homeland Security is suspending enforcement of the E.O. The Department of State is reinstating the approximately 60,000 visas that were provisionally revoked, and airlines have been told to start boarding individuals from the 7 affected countries. Procedures for issuance of visas at embassies and consulates abroad and processing of applications for admissions at the ports of entry will return to those in place prior to issuance of the E.O. on January 27, 2017 for the duration of the TRO.  

The Department of Justice is expected to file for a stay of Judge Robart’s order as soon as possible. Nonetheless, the Administration has indicated that while the TRO is in effect, individuals from the affected countries will be allowed to travel to the United States.

Certain details surrounding how the government intends to comply with the Court’s decision are not yet clear. For example, the government has not indicated whether individuals who had their visa stamps physically marked as “cancelled” as a consequence of the EO will be able to board aircraft for the U.S. immediately, or whether they will be required to reapply for a visa at the consulate. It is also not clear whether individuals whose Global Entry memberships were cancelled in response to the EO will have their memberships reinstated.

Because the government is expected to seek a stay of the TRO, the window of opportunity to return to the United States may be limited. Once the Ninth Circuit rules on Judge Robart’s TRO, it could then be appealed on an emergency basis to Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy of the U.S. Supreme Court. 

Below is a notice just issued by DHS:

In accordance with the judge's ruling, DHS has suspended any and all actions implementing the affected sections of the Executive Order entitled, "Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States."

This includes actions to suspend passenger system rules that flag travelers for operational action subject to the Executive Order.

DHS personnel will resume inspection of travelers in accordance with standard policy and procedure.

At the earliest possible time, the Department of Justice intends to file an emergency stay of this order and defend the President's Executive Order, which is lawful and appropriate. The Order is intended to protect the homeland and the American people, and the President has no higher duty and responsibility than to do so.

As the situation is in flux and subject to further changes, Jackson Lewis attorneys will continue to provide updates. Please contact your Jackson Lewis attorney with any questions.

©2017 Jackson Lewis P.C. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Jackson Lewis and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Reproduction of this material in whole or in part is prohibited without the express prior written consent of Jackson Lewis P.C., a law firm with more than 900 attorneys in major cities nationwide serving clients across a wide range of practices and industries. Having built its reputation on providing premier workplace law representation to management, the firm has grown to include leading practices in the areas of government relations, healthcare and sports law. For more information, visit

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

January 7, 2019

2019: The Year Ahead for Employers

January 7, 2019

Over the past year, state and local governments responded in a variety of ways to national policy, and the midterm elections painted a picture of what’s in store for employers in 2019 and beyond. Jackson Lewis’ annual report outlines upcoming issues, trends, legislation and regulations employers need to be aware of in the coming year... Read More

September 21, 2018

What the Rise in Worksite Raids and I-9 Audits Means for the Construction Industry

September 21, 2018

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) audits and worksite raids are surging across the country, and the construction industry is often the target. The Trump Administration has made it a key priority of its immigration policy to ramp up I-9 audits and worksite raids, which should put the labor-scarce construction industry on alert... Read More

July 9, 2018

Brett Kavanaugh Nominated to U.S. Supreme Court

July 9, 2018

In the wake of Justice Anthony Kennedy’s retirement, President Donald Trump was presented with the rare opportunity to make his second U.S. Supreme Court nomination in as many years, nominating the Honorable Brett M. Kavanaugh to succeed Justice Kennedy. If confirmed by the Senate, Judge Kavanaugh would bring more than a dozen years of... Read More

Related Practices