Search form

Why Employers Need to Update Their Workplace Drug and Alcohol Policies in 2016

By Kathryn J. Russo
  • January 7, 2016

The beginning of a new year is a good time for employers to review their workplace policies to assess what changes are necessary. Employers that conduct drug and alcohol testing should consider updating their substance abuse testing policies now, particularly if they have not done so in several years.

Here are the top 10 reasons why:

1.  Medical Marijuana is Here to Stay. While marijuana remains illegal under federal law, the federal government is backing away slowly from enforcement, and an increasing number of states are enacting medical marijuana laws, some including prohibitions on workplace discrimination against medical marijuana users. Employers should review all applicable medical marijuana laws carefully while considering the possible legal and safety risks.

2.  Educate Employees about the Dangers of Prescription Painkillers and Heroin. A nationwide prescription painkiller epidemic has existed for some time. Because these drugs are prescribed freely by the medical profession, many people do not understand the dangers, including addiction and death. In 2015, the National Safety Council urged employers to educate employees about the risks of using opioid pain medications while also taking steps to avoid potential liability in workers’ compensation and personal injury litigation. (For details, see the NSC report, Prescription Pain Medications: A Fatal Cure For Injured Workers.) Further, employees should be educated about the link between prescription painkiller abuse and heroin addiction, another nationwide epidemic.

3.  Consider Effectiveness of Your Drug Test Panel. Still using the basic 5-panel drug test, consisting of marijuana, amphetamines, cocaine, opiates, and PCP? If so, consider whether that panel is effective to combat the prescription painkiller epidemic as it affects the workplace. Talk to your drug testing vendor to ascertain positivity rates for the popular illicit drugs in your area, weigh any additional testing cost, and consult with legal counsel to ensure that it is legal to expand the panel (some states have restrictions).

4.  If Testing for Prescription Drugs, Be Careful When Making Employment Decisions. Although employers may find it appropriate to expand their drug testing panels to include drugs such as prescription painkillers, they should avoid making adverse employment decisions based on erroneous ideas about those prescription drugs. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has sued employers who make adverse employment decisions based on incorrect assumptions about an applicant’s or employee’s use of prescription drugs (e.g., refusal to hire a methadone user).

5.  Require “Safety-Sensitive” Employees to Report Use of Prescription or Over-the-Counter Medications that Could Impact Safety. Employees in dangerous jobs should not report for work while using prescription or over-the-counter medications that could affect their ability to perform their jobs safely. The employer has an obligation to have an “interactive dialogue” with the employee disclosing this usage (under the Americans with Disabilities Act and comparable state laws) to determine whether a reasonable accommodation is possible or whether the employee poses a “direct threat” to the health or safety of himself or others.

6.  Do You Have a Comprehensive Definition of “Refusal to Test”? Many workplace drug and alcohol testing policies fall short because employers do not clearly define what constitutes a refusal to test. For example, employees selected for drug testing often attempt to delay the test. Does your policy make it clear that employees who do not report to a testing site promptly when selected will be terminated?

7.  Train Your Supervisors to Make Reasonable Suspicion Determinations. Do your supervisors enforce your drug and alcohol testing policy effectively? Can they identify reasonable suspicion and act on it? Do you worry that most of your supervisors just ignore the drug and alcohol policy? Update the policy to define supervisors’ responsibilities clearly and train them to enforce the policy diligently and effectively.

8.  Is Your Post-Accident Testing Provision Effective? Many employers struggle with determining what will trigger a post-accident or post-incident drug or alcohol test. Some states restrict or prohibit post-accident testing. Even where it is permissible, a post-accident testing policy must be written clearly and enforced consistently.

9.  Demands for Drug Testing by Business Partners are on the Rise. More and more business partners (host companies) are demanding that employers drug test employees before allowing them to access their premises to perform work. Consider how you will handle these situations, including what to do if an employee refuses to submit to a test or tests positive for prohibited substances.

10.  Is It Legal? Employers must ensure that all provisions of their drug and alcohol testing policies comply with applicable federal, state, and local laws. Failure to do so may lead to monetary damages and statutory penalties.

Jackson Lewis attorneys are available to review and update employers’ policies, helping to ensure they are in compliance.

©2016 Jackson Lewis P.C. This Update is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice nor does it create an attorney/client relationship between Jackson Lewis and any readers or recipients. Readers should consult counsel of their own choosing to discuss how these matters relate to their individual circumstances. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without the express written consent of Jackson Lewis.

This Update may be considered attorney advertising in some states. Furthermore, prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Jackson Lewis P.C. represents management exclusively in workplace law and related litigation. Our attorneys are available to assist employers in their compliance efforts and to represent employers in matters before state and federal courts and administrative agencies. For more information, please contact the attorney(s) listed or the Jackson Lewis attorney with whom you regularly work.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

February 21, 2018

Maine Recreational Marijuana Law Limits Drug Testing, Disciplinary Consequences Imposed by Employers

February 21, 2018

A provision of Maine’s recreational marijuana law prohibits employers from taking adverse employment actions for off-premises marijuana use, as of February 1, 2018. This law effectively prevents Maine employers from testing for marijuana for pre-employment purposes. The law also affects employers who employ employees subject to federal... Read More

February 7, 2018

Déjà Vu: Implications of a Government Shutdown on Federal Contractors

February 7, 2018

For the second time in a month, for lack of agreement on funding the government long-term, we face the specter of a government shutdown. The government shutdown that began on January 20, 2018, lasted three days. Congress ended that shutdown after voting on a stopgap measure to fund the government until February 8, 2018. As that date... Read More

February 5, 2018

Puerto Rico Bars Use of Legitimate Absences in Performance Review, Adds Catastrophic Illness Leave

February 5, 2018

Just one year after substantial changes to Puerto Rico employment laws became effective, the Governor has enacted two new sick leave laws. One shields employees from adverse consequences from sick leave use. The other creates a special leave for catastrophic illnesses. Act No. 60 of January 27, 2018 The Puerto Rico Minimum Wage,... Read More