Search form

Colorado Supreme Court: Medical Use of Marijuana Not 'Lawful'

By Kathryn J. Russo
  • June 17, 2015

In a long-awaited decision, the Colorado Supreme Court unanimously upheld an employer’s termination of an employee who tested positive on a drug test due to his off-duty use of medical marijuana. Coats v. Dish Network, LLC, No. 13SC394 (June 15, 2015). Interpreting Colorado’s “lawful activities statute,” the Court held the term “lawful” refers only to activities that are lawful under both state and federal law. Since marijuana remains unlawful under federal law, although its medical use is allowed under state law, the Court refused to extend the protection of the statute to the employee.

Background

Brandon Coats was employed as a telephone customer service representative by Dish Network, LLC. In 2010, Coats received a medical marijuana license from the state to use marijuana to treat muscle spasms caused by his paraplegia. In May 2010, Coats tested positive for tetrahydrocannabinol (“THC”), a component of marijuana, during a random drug test for the employer. As a result, Dish fired Coats for violation of the company’s drug policy.

Coats filed suit, alleging wrongful termination under Colorado’s “lawful activities statute.” The statute prohibits employee discharge based on the employee’s engagement in “lawful activities” while the employee is off of the employer’s premises and during nonworking time. Coats argued that Dish terminated his employment for his off-duty use of medical marijuana, which was “lawful” under Colorado’s Medical Marijuana Amendment. 

The trial court, however, dismissed his claim, finding that the Medical Marijuana Amendment provided registered patients with an affirmative defense to criminal prosecution, but did not make their use of medical marijuana a “lawful activity” under the lawful activities law

On appeal, a divided Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of the trial court, basing its decision on the illegality of marijuana under the federal Controlled Substances Act. The Court of Appeals found that for a specific activity to be “lawful,” the activity must be permissible under both state and federal law. Because federal law prohibits the use of marijuana, the employee’s conduct could not be a “lawful activity” protected by the Colorado statute.

No Restriction on “Lawful”

The Colorado Supreme Court affirmed the opinion of the Court of Appeals in a 6-0 ruling. The high court held that the term “lawful,” as used in the Colorado lawful activities statute, is not restricted in any way. Accordingly, an activity that is unlawful under federal law, such as medical marijuana use, is not a “lawful” activity, even if it is permissible under Colorado law. 

The Court unanimously rejected the employee’s argument that “lawful” should be read to include those activities that are lawful under Colorado law alone. It said that it refused to “engraft a state law limitation onto the statutory language.” Because the employee’s use of medical marijuana was unlawful under federal law, his off-duty use of medical marijuana was not protected.

The Court also noted that although Congress recently passed a budget bill prohibiting the U.S. Department of Justice from using federal funds to prevent states from implementing medical marijuana laws, marijuana use remains illegal under federal law.

***

While Colorado is regarded as one of the most liberal states in the country as to marijuana use, Colorado’s medical marijuana law provides that “nothing in this section shall require any employer to accommodate the medical use of marijuana in any work place.” Even the state’s recreational marijuana statute provides that “nothing in this section is intended to require an employer to permit or accommodate the use, consumption, possession, transfer, display, transportation, sale or growing of marijuana in the workplace or to affect the ability of employers to have policies restricting the use of marijuana by employees.” Other states, however, have medical marijuana laws that expressly prohibit employment discrimination against medical marijuana users.

This case continues the trend of employer victories in medical marijuana cases. Employers have successfully litigated medical marijuana cases in California, Colorado, Michigan, Montana, Oregon, and Washington. Although public acceptance of medical marijuana is growing and more states continue to enact medical marijuana laws, the courts recognize that federal illegality is still a significant obstacle for marijuana users who wish to challenge their employer’s employment actions. 

If you have any questions about this or other workplace issues, please contact the Jackson Lewis attorney with whom you regularly work.

©2015 Jackson Lewis P.C. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Jackson Lewis and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Reproduction of this material in whole or in part is prohibited without the express prior written consent of Jackson Lewis P.C., a law firm that built its reputation on providing workplace law representation to management. Founded in 1958, the firm has grown to more than 900 attorneys in major cities nationwide serving clients across a wide range of practices and industries including government relations, healthcare and sports law. More information about Jackson Lewis can be found at www.jacksonlewis.com.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

June 11, 2019

Illinois Legalizes Recreational Marijuana

June 11, 2019

The Illinois General Assembly passed the Cannabis Regulation and Tax Act (“the Act”) (HB 1438) on May 31, 2019. Governor J.B. Pritzker has stated he will sign the bill.  The Act legalizes marijuana for recreational purposes. The Act, which takes effect on January 1, 2020, will allow anyone over the age of 21 to possess, use, or buy... Read More

May 15, 2019

EPLI Trends, Sexual Harassment Claims, and Planning for 2019

May 15, 2019

As workplace laws continue to evolve, the potential risk exposure is increasing. Jackson Lewis prepared this trends overview to help assess the current workplace law landscape in the #MeToo era and the wave of agency charges, latest claims, and new laws.  Highlights include: Pay Equity Lawsuits: The Next Wave of Litigation... Read More

May 13, 2019

New York City Employers Are Barred from Testing Job Applicants for Marijuana Use

May 13, 2019

New York City has enacted a law prohibiting New York City employers from requiring prospective employees to submit to testing for the presence of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the active ingredient in marijuana. The new law, the first of its kind in the United States, became effective on May 10, 2019. The obligations under Intro... Read More